Similar Items: The correct understanding of the Business Judgment Rule in Section 76(4) of the Companies Act 71 of 2008: avoiding the American mistakes
- Codification of the Business Judgment Rule in Section 76 (4) Companies Act 2008: comparing the South African with the German approach
- Common law duties and section 76 of the Companies Act, 71 of 2008 compared
- Capital rules in the Companies Act 71 of 2008
- Capital rules in the New Companies Act No. 71 of 2008
- Capital rules in terms of the Companies Act No. 71 of 2008
- Standards of care, skill, diligence, and the business judgment rule in view of South Africa's Companies Act 71 of 2008: future implications for corporate governance
Author: Idensohn, Kathy
- Thinking small further? South Africa's company law reform and its German counterpart: perspectives for SMMEs
- Business rescue for Zambia: suggestions for legislative reform
- How comparative laws of foreign jurisdictions may be used by South African courts to find the fair value of shares when shareholders use the appraisal remedy provided for in s 164 of the South African Companies Act 71 of 2008
- The correct understanding of the Business Judgment Rule in Section 76(4) of the Companies Act 71 of 2008: avoiding the American mistakes
- The responsibilities of the board of directors in promoting the principles of corporate governance