-
The Sources of the Civil Code of Louisiana
-
Bilingual English-Spanish Louisiana Civil Code, Book III, Title VI
-
The Bicentennial of the 1825 Civil Code of Louisiana
-
The Rejection and Reemergence of the 1825 Louisiana Civil Code in California
-
Consideration, Detrimental Reliance, Promissory Estoppel or the 1984 CommonLaw “Rodents” in the Louisiana Civil Code of 1825
-
Revisiting the Genesis of French Louisiana: It’s No Coincidence the Civil Code Was Adopted—We Ain’t Anglos!
-
Variations on Property and Power: Corporations, Absolute Dominium, and Partus Sequitur Ventrem in the 1825 Louisiana Civil Code
-
Civil Code Reforms and Sources of Law: The French and Quebec Experience Compared
-
Restrictions for the Modern-Day Child: Act 456, No. 162, Implementing Social Media Restrictions for Minors Under 18 in Louisiana
-
Printing the Civil Code of 1825: A Bibliographic Essay
-
A Limited Utilization of French Doctrine “La possession vaut titre” in Louisiana: Acts 2023, No. 401, Providing Relative to the Transfer of Movables Between Good Faith Purchaser and Merchant Selling with Consent from the Owner
-
Dirk Heirbaut, Redefining Codification: A Comparative History of Civil, Commerical, and Procedural Codes
-
Kobaliya v. Russia: Curtailing Civil Society Through Labels of Foreign Influence.
-
La place de la loi dans le Code civil de 1804 : regard rétrospectif
-
A Bulletproof Shield: Act 2, SB 2 Limiting Civil Liability for Authorized Persons Using Firearms in Self-Defense Shootings
-
Vulnerability in the Law
-
What Belongs in a Constitutional Law Casebook?
-
Constitutional Structure and Election Law
-
The High Cost of Law School Casebooks
-
Direct Representation and Negotiorum Gestio in Scots Law
-
Migration in Context and Law: Global Displacement and the U.S. Immigration System
-
Digital Surveillance in Remote Work in Ukraine: Privacy and Labor Law
-
Jurisprudential Approach to the Concept of Intent in Greek Law 3869/2010 (Personal Bankruptcy) with Comparative Perspectives
-
Unequal Shelter: A Constitutional Challenge to the Adams Administration’s Differential Treatment Of Migrants Under New York’s Right to Shelter Laws
