Author: Corder, Hugh
Similar Items: Are the current Zambian constitutional provisions sufficient in preventing abuse of power by the executive organ of government?
- The burgeoning constitutional requirement of rationality and separation of powers has rationality review gone too far?
- Attaining Justice through ‘Just and Equitable Compensation': A critique of South African courts' current approach to section 25(3) of The Constitution, and determining whether ‘Expropriation without Compensation' may be considered ‘Just and Equitable'
- Punishing the homeless: The constitutionality of the criminalisation of homelessness in the City of Cape Town
- Does the lack of sufficient formulation and articulation of principles guiding the limits of the Constitutional Court undermine its legitimacy?
- A critical examination of overreach in judicial decision-making by the Constitutional Court of South Africa
- Redistributive justice: affirming section 9 of the constitution through the imposition of a wealth tax on apartheid beneficiaries