Similar Items: Are the relevant provisions of the Rotterdam Rules dealing with the identification of the carrier an improvement over the Hamburg and Hague-Visby Rules?
- An evaluation of the solutions provided by the Rotterdam Rules to identifying the carrier
- A current assessment of the Hamburg rules
- The rotterdam rules: do they solve the problems arising from multimodal transportation?
- The Rotterdam Rules: Do They Solve the Problems arising from Multimodal Transportation?
- An examination of the inadequacy of the wording of the damage claim provisions of the Oil Pollution Act of 1990, resulting in interpretative legal difficulties as revealed by claims stemming from the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill
- Do the provisions of section 3(7)(a)(ii) read with section 3(7)(b)(i) of the Admiralty Jurisdiction Regulation Act 105 of 1983 infringe the substantive requirements of section 25(1) of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa Act 108 of 1996?
Author: Bradfield, Graham
- Studies on transgenic tobacco plants containing geminiviral DNA
- Analysing the decline of the usage of the Lloyd's Open Form Agreement (LOF) for a vessel in distress at sea
- Has criminalisation of the master subverted the aim of International Pollution Instruments to impose uniformity on the consequences of ship-source pollution?
- Arrest in South Africa of ships associated by common control of state-owned companies
- Are the relevant provisions of the Rotterdam Rules dealing with the identification of the carrier an improvement over the Hamburg and Hague-Visby Rules?
- Competition class action damages and the corporate leniency policy