Full Text Available
Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.
The politics of the Kiobel decision: The United States Supreme Court narrowing of jurisdiction under the Alien Tort Statute
This thesis examines the United States’ Supreme Court’s decision in the Kiobel case and argues the decision unjustly and unreasonably favored the interests of corporations over human rights. In doing so, the Court significantly narrowed the scope of the Alien Tort Statute in a manner which allowed t...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis |
| Published: |
AUC Knowledge Fountain
2018
|
| Subjects: | |
| Tags: |
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items: The politics of the Kiobel decision: The United States Supreme Court narrowing of jurisdiction under the Alien Tort Statute
- Going national: universal jurisdiction and the principle of complementarity in the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court
- Implementing the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court domestically : a comparative analysis of strategies in Africa
- From Pirates to Corporations: The Evolving Battleground of the Alien Tort Statute
- The Analytical Routes of Aiding and Abetting Under the Alien Tort Statute
- In search of international tort law : civil liability of arms manufacturers for indirect sales to embargoed conflict zones
- The inherent review jurisdiction of the supreme court