Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

Public education in the United States in a post-Brown era: the antinomies of equal protection doctrine

In the United States, public schools are primarily financed by local tax on property. This property-tax-based system of finance is advantageous for people living in wealthy districts, as they benefit from greater educational funding resources. Residents of poorer districts, however, have the disadva...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Rizk, Sarah
Format: Thesis
Published: AUC Knowledge Fountain 2012
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613414531006464
access_status_str Open Access
author Rizk, Sarah
author_browse Rizk, Sarah
author_facet Rizk, Sarah
author_sort Rizk, Sarah
collection Thesis
dc_rights_str_mv The author retains all rights with regard to copyright. The author certifies that written permission from the owner(s) of third-party copyrighted matter included in the thesis, dissertation, paper, or record of study has been obtained. The author further certifies that IRB approval has been obtained for this thesis, or that IRB approval is not necessary for this thesis. Insofar as this thesis, dissertation, paper, or record of study is an educational record as defined in the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) (20 USC 1232g), the author has granted consent to disclosure of it to anyone who requests a copy.
description In the United States, public schools are primarily financed by local tax on property. This property-tax-based system of finance is advantageous for people living in wealthy districts, as they benefit from greater educational funding resources. Residents of poorer districts, however, have the disadvantage of higher taxation that is needed to balance the deficit created by the lower value of property in these areas in order to finance local services. Through the use of local exclusionary planning and zoning powers, local governments can ensure that residents contribute a minimum amount of taxation to fund local services and to zone out â expensive studentsâ who need more funds than their wealthier peers while their families contribute less to the local tax pool. In a society with a history of racial discrimination, this system has led to the creation of structural segregation in education that follows a pattern of residential segregation. Society's adoption of equal opportunity rhetoric since the successful challenge of legal segregation in Brown has masked this reality and made it more difficult for depressed minorities to explain their condition. The injustice is produced by the interplay between historical subordination and a vague suspicion that equality has been achieved when formal barriers were removed. The potential for change was both created and limited by engaging the rights discourse because the emphasis on formalism and colorblindness since Brown has rendered the achievement of formal equality an end in itself. This makes it very difficult to redress the lasting material disadvantage that resulted from a discriminatory past because the dominant theory of equal protection that is infused with an â anti-differentiationâ understanding of the law often rules out remedial policies that use race-based classifications.
format Thesis
id oai:fount.aucegypt.edu:etds-1971
institution American University in Cairo (Egypt)
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:35:44.926Z
license_str Other — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from AUC Knowledge Fountain — bepress
publishDate 2012
publishDateRange 2012
publishDateSort 2012
publisher AUC Knowledge Fountain
publisherStr AUC Knowledge Fountain
record_format dspace
source_str AUC Knowledge Fountain — bepress
spelling oai:fount.aucegypt.edu:etds-1971 Public education in the United States in a post-Brown era: the antinomies of equal protection doctrine Rizk, Sarah In the United States, public schools are primarily financed by local tax on property. This property-tax-based system of finance is advantageous for people living in wealthy districts, as they benefit from greater educational funding resources. Residents of poorer districts, however, have the disadvantage of higher taxation that is needed to balance the deficit created by the lower value of property in these areas in order to finance local services. Through the use of local exclusionary planning and zoning powers, local governments can ensure that residents contribute a minimum amount of taxation to fund local services and to zone out â expensive studentsâ who need more funds than their wealthier peers while their families contribute less to the local tax pool. In a society with a history of racial discrimination, this system has led to the creation of structural segregation in education that follows a pattern of residential segregation. Society's adoption of equal opportunity rhetoric since the successful challenge of legal segregation in Brown has masked this reality and made it more difficult for depressed minorities to explain their condition. The injustice is produced by the interplay between historical subordination and a vague suspicion that equality has been achieved when formal barriers were removed. The potential for change was both created and limited by engaging the rights discourse because the emphasis on formalism and colorblindness since Brown has rendered the achievement of formal equality an end in itself. This makes it very difficult to redress the lasting material disadvantage that resulted from a discriminatory past because the dominant theory of equal protection that is infused with an â anti-differentiationâ understanding of the law often rules out remedial policies that use race-based classifications. 2012-06-01T07:00:00Z thesis application/pdf https://fount.aucegypt.edu/etds/972 https://fount.aucegypt.edu/context/etds/article/1971/viewcontent/Rizk_AUC_20Thesis_20May_20_2712.pdf The author retains all rights with regard to copyright. The author certifies that written permission from the owner(s) of third-party copyrighted matter included in the thesis, dissertation, paper, or record of study has been obtained. The author further certifies that IRB approval has been obtained for this thesis, or that IRB approval is not necessary for this thesis. Insofar as this thesis, dissertation, paper, or record of study is an educational record as defined in the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) (20 USC 1232g), the author has granted consent to disclosure of it to anyone who requests a copy. Theses and Dissertations AUC Knowledge Fountain Brown Oliver 1918-1961 -- Trials litigation etc. Topeka (Kan.). Board of Education -- Trials litigation etc.
spellingShingle Brown
Oliver
1918-1961 -- Trials
litigation
etc.
Topeka (Kan.). Board of Education -- Trials
litigation
etc.
Rizk, Sarah
Public education in the United States in a post-Brown era: the antinomies of equal protection doctrine
title Public education in the United States in a post-Brown era: the antinomies of equal protection doctrine
title_full Public education in the United States in a post-Brown era: the antinomies of equal protection doctrine
title_fullStr Public education in the United States in a post-Brown era: the antinomies of equal protection doctrine
title_full_unstemmed Public education in the United States in a post-Brown era: the antinomies of equal protection doctrine
title_short Public education in the United States in a post-Brown era: the antinomies of equal protection doctrine
title_sort public education in the united states in a post brown era the antinomies of equal protection doctrine
topic Brown
Oliver
1918-1961 -- Trials
litigation
etc.
Topeka (Kan.). Board of Education -- Trials
litigation
etc.
url https://fount.aucegypt.edu/etds/972
https://fount.aucegypt.edu/context/etds/article/1971/viewcontent/Rizk_AUC_20Thesis_20May_20_2712.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT rizksarah publiceducationintheunitedstatesinapostbrowneratheantinomiesofequalprotectiondoctrine