Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

Parliamentary versus presidential political system: options for Egypt post January 2011

The debate on the merits of the parliamentary system of government versus the presidential system has been going on for many years now. Recently the topic attracted increased empirical attention with studies that looked at the impact of the system of government on different political, economic, and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hamdy, Ashraf
Format: Thesis
Published: AUC Knowledge Fountain 2011
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613416083947520
access_status_str Open Access
author Hamdy, Ashraf
author_browse Hamdy, Ashraf
author_facet Hamdy, Ashraf
author_sort Hamdy, Ashraf
collection Thesis
dc_rights_str_mv The author retains all rights with regard to copyright. The author certifies that written permission from the owner(s) of third-party copyrighted matter included in the thesis, dissertation, paper, or record of study has been obtained. The author further certifies that IRB approval has been obtained for this thesis, or that IRB approval is not necessary for this thesis. Insofar as this thesis, dissertation, paper, or record of study is an educational record as defined in the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) (20 USC 1232g), the author has granted consent to disclosure of it to anyone who requests a copy.
description The debate on the merits of the parliamentary system of government versus the presidential system has been going on for many years now. Recently the topic attracted increased empirical attention with studies that looked at the impact of the system of government on different political, economic, and social aspects. This work adds to the literature a study that, using a global data set, empirically analyzes the effects of the choice of government system on income inequality, the level of political freedom, and the level of civil liberties in a society in general with an application to Egypt in particular. The empirical analysis revealed a strong relationship between parliamentarism as a political system and income equality, political rights and civil liberties in a society. The parliamentary system of government appears to be advantageous, compared to the presidential system, in its effect on the three main aspects under evaluation.
format Thesis
id oai:fount.aucegypt.edu:etds-2116
institution American University in Cairo (Egypt)
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:35:47.730Z
license_str Other — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from AUC Knowledge Fountain — bepress
publishDate 2011
publishDateRange 2011
publishDateSort 2011
publisher AUC Knowledge Fountain
publisherStr AUC Knowledge Fountain
record_format dspace
source_str AUC Knowledge Fountain — bepress
spelling oai:fount.aucegypt.edu:etds-2116 Parliamentary versus presidential political system: options for Egypt post January 2011 Hamdy, Ashraf The debate on the merits of the parliamentary system of government versus the presidential system has been going on for many years now. Recently the topic attracted increased empirical attention with studies that looked at the impact of the system of government on different political, economic, and social aspects. This work adds to the literature a study that, using a global data set, empirically analyzes the effects of the choice of government system on income inequality, the level of political freedom, and the level of civil liberties in a society in general with an application to Egypt in particular. The empirical analysis revealed a strong relationship between parliamentarism as a political system and income equality, political rights and civil liberties in a society. The parliamentary system of government appears to be advantageous, compared to the presidential system, in its effect on the three main aspects under evaluation. 2011-06-01T07:00:00Z thesis application/pdf https://fount.aucegypt.edu/etds/1117 https://fount.aucegypt.edu/context/etds/article/2116/viewcontent/ETD_2011_Spring_Ashraf_Hamdy_Thesis.pdf The author retains all rights with regard to copyright. The author certifies that written permission from the owner(s) of third-party copyrighted matter included in the thesis, dissertation, paper, or record of study has been obtained. The author further certifies that IRB approval has been obtained for this thesis, or that IRB approval is not necessary for this thesis. Insofar as this thesis, dissertation, paper, or record of study is an educational record as defined in the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) (20 USC 1232g), the author has granted consent to disclosure of it to anyone who requests a copy. Theses and Dissertations AUC Knowledge Fountain Institutiol design Parliamentarism
spellingShingle Institutiol design
Parliamentarism
Hamdy, Ashraf
Parliamentary versus presidential political system: options for Egypt post January 2011
title Parliamentary versus presidential political system: options for Egypt post January 2011
title_full Parliamentary versus presidential political system: options for Egypt post January 2011
title_fullStr Parliamentary versus presidential political system: options for Egypt post January 2011
title_full_unstemmed Parliamentary versus presidential political system: options for Egypt post January 2011
title_short Parliamentary versus presidential political system: options for Egypt post January 2011
title_sort parliamentary versus presidential political system options for egypt post january 2011
topic Institutiol design
Parliamentarism
url https://fount.aucegypt.edu/etds/1117
https://fount.aucegypt.edu/context/etds/article/2116/viewcontent/ETD_2011_Spring_Ashraf_Hamdy_Thesis.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT hamdyashraf parliamentaryversuspresidentialpoliticalsystemoptionsforegyptpostjanuary2011