Full Text Available
Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.
Illumination tolerance in facial recognition
In this research work, five different preprocessing techniques were experimented with two different classifiers to find the best match for preprocessor + classifier combination to built an illumination tolerant face recognition system. Hence, a face recognition system is proposed based on illuminati...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis |
| Published: |
AUC Knowledge Fountain
2014
|
| Subjects: | |
| Tags: |
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1867613416465629184 |
|---|---|
| access_status_str | Open Access |
| author | Mahmoud, Aishat Dan-Ali |
| author_browse | Mahmoud, Aishat Dan-Ali |
| author_facet | Mahmoud, Aishat Dan-Ali |
| author_sort | Mahmoud, Aishat Dan-Ali |
| collection | Thesis |
| dc_rights_str_mv | The author retains all rights with regard to copyright. The author certifies that written permission from the owner(s) of third-party copyrighted matter included in the thesis, dissertation, paper, or record of study has been obtained. The author further certifies that IRB approval has been obtained for this thesis, or that IRB approval is not necessary for this thesis. Insofar as this thesis, dissertation, paper, or record of study is an educational record as defined in the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) (20 USC 1232g), the author has granted consent to disclosure of it to anyone who requests a copy. |
| description | In this research work, five different preprocessing techniques were experimented with two different classifiers to find the best match for preprocessor + classifier combination to built an illumination tolerant face recognition system. Hence, a face recognition system is proposed based on illumination normalization techniques and linear subspace model using two distance metrics on three challenging, yet interesting databases. The databases are CAS PEAL database, the Extended Yale B database, and the AT&T database. The research takes the form of experimentation and analysis in which five illumination normalization techniques were compared and analyzed using two different distance metrics. The performances and execution times of the various techniques were recorded and measured for accuracy and efficiency. The illumination normalization techniques were Gamma Intensity Correction (GIC), discrete Cosine Transform (DCT), Histogram Remapping using Normal distribution (HRN), Histogram Remapping using Log-normal distribution (HRL), and Anisotropic Smoothing technique (AS). The linear subspace models utilized were principal component analysis (PCA) and Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA). The two distance metrics were Euclidean and Cosine distance. The result showed that for databases with both illumination (shadows), and lighting (over-exposure) variations like the CAS PEAL database the Histogram remapping technique with normal distribution produced excellent result when the cosine distance is used as the classifier. The result indicated 65% recognition rate in 15.8 ms/img. Alternatively for databases consisting of pure illumination variation, like the extended Yale B database, the Gamma Intensity Correction (GIC) merged with the Euclidean distance metric gave the most accurate result with 95.4% recognition accuracy in 1ms/img. It was further gathered from the set of experiments that the cosine distance produces more accurate result compared to the Euclidean distance metric. However the Euclidean distance is faster than the cosine distance in all the experiments conducted. |
| format | Thesis |
| id | oai:fount.aucegypt.edu:etds-2203 |
| institution | American University in Cairo (Egypt) |
| last_indexed | 2026-06-10T12:35:47.730Z |
| license_str | Other — see source repository |
| provenance_str_mv | Harvested via OAI-PMH from AUC Knowledge Fountain — bepress |
| publishDate | 2014 |
| publishDateRange | 2014 |
| publishDateSort | 2014 |
| publisher | AUC Knowledge Fountain |
| publisherStr | AUC Knowledge Fountain |
| record_format | dspace |
| source_str | AUC Knowledge Fountain — bepress |
| spelling | oai:fount.aucegypt.edu:etds-2203 Illumination tolerance in facial recognition Mahmoud, Aishat Dan-Ali In this research work, five different preprocessing techniques were experimented with two different classifiers to find the best match for preprocessor + classifier combination to built an illumination tolerant face recognition system. Hence, a face recognition system is proposed based on illumination normalization techniques and linear subspace model using two distance metrics on three challenging, yet interesting databases. The databases are CAS PEAL database, the Extended Yale B database, and the AT&T database. The research takes the form of experimentation and analysis in which five illumination normalization techniques were compared and analyzed using two different distance metrics. The performances and execution times of the various techniques were recorded and measured for accuracy and efficiency. The illumination normalization techniques were Gamma Intensity Correction (GIC), discrete Cosine Transform (DCT), Histogram Remapping using Normal distribution (HRN), Histogram Remapping using Log-normal distribution (HRL), and Anisotropic Smoothing technique (AS). The linear subspace models utilized were principal component analysis (PCA) and Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA). The two distance metrics were Euclidean and Cosine distance. The result showed that for databases with both illumination (shadows), and lighting (over-exposure) variations like the CAS PEAL database the Histogram remapping technique with normal distribution produced excellent result when the cosine distance is used as the classifier. The result indicated 65% recognition rate in 15.8 ms/img. Alternatively for databases consisting of pure illumination variation, like the extended Yale B database, the Gamma Intensity Correction (GIC) merged with the Euclidean distance metric gave the most accurate result with 95.4% recognition accuracy in 1ms/img. It was further gathered from the set of experiments that the cosine distance produces more accurate result compared to the Euclidean distance metric. However the Euclidean distance is faster than the cosine distance in all the experiments conducted. 2014-02-01T08:00:00Z thesis application/pdf https://fount.aucegypt.edu/etds/1204 https://fount.aucegypt.edu/context/etds/article/2203/viewcontent/Microsoft_20Word_20__20AdMahmoud_Thesis.docx.pdf The author retains all rights with regard to copyright. The author certifies that written permission from the owner(s) of third-party copyrighted matter included in the thesis, dissertation, paper, or record of study has been obtained. The author further certifies that IRB approval has been obtained for this thesis, or that IRB approval is not necessary for this thesis. Insofar as this thesis, dissertation, paper, or record of study is an educational record as defined in the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) (20 USC 1232g), the author has granted consent to disclosure of it to anyone who requests a copy. Theses and Dissertations AUC Knowledge Fountain Face perception Principal components alysis |
| spellingShingle | Face perception Principal components alysis Mahmoud, Aishat Dan-Ali Illumination tolerance in facial recognition |
| title | Illumination tolerance in facial recognition |
| title_full | Illumination tolerance in facial recognition |
| title_fullStr | Illumination tolerance in facial recognition |
| title_full_unstemmed | Illumination tolerance in facial recognition |
| title_short | Illumination tolerance in facial recognition |
| title_sort | illumination tolerance in facial recognition |
| topic | Face perception Principal components alysis |
| url | https://fount.aucegypt.edu/etds/1204 https://fount.aucegypt.edu/context/etds/article/2203/viewcontent/Microsoft_20Word_20__20AdMahmoud_Thesis.docx.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mahmoudaishatdanali illuminationtoleranceinfacialrecognition |