Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

Finding Neverland? Artificial Intelligence and the Jurisprudence of Legal Certainty

The development of artificial intelligence (AI) models that are capable of predicting the decisions of prominent courts – most notably the European Court of Human Rights and United States Supreme Court – provides us with an opportunity to revisit important jurisprudential debates regarding the quest...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Zaky, Omar
Format: Thesis
Published: AUC Knowledge Fountain 2021
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613420108382208
access_status_str Open Access
author Zaky, Omar
author_browse Zaky, Omar
author_facet Zaky, Omar
author_sort Zaky, Omar
collection Thesis
description The development of artificial intelligence (AI) models that are capable of predicting the decisions of prominent courts – most notably the European Court of Human Rights and United States Supreme Court – provides us with an opportunity to revisit important jurisprudential debates regarding the quest for legal certainty. Through providing clear distinctions within formalistic jurisprudence, and its, subsequent, realist critique; this thesis seeks to analyze legal decision-making and its relationship with artificial intelligence. I argue that, AI’s deterministic nature and its support for the law being an “entirely self-contained process” does lend some credence to certain jurisprudential arguments. However, this should not be misconstrued as support for a formalistic approach towards legal certainty. Rather, AI’s empirical attempt at understanding the contributing factors that create a legal decision, reaffirms a functional understanding of the law. Moreover, through highlighting the definitional issues of AI, its problematic facets and existing case law, this thesis seeks to provide a more nuanced comprehension of AI within the legal industry. I further argue that, inversed-AI models possess inherent inadequacies and, consequently, are at fundamental odds with the decision-making process; thus, preventing them from being reliable indicators of AI’s potential in the legal process. This is supported by the emergence of legal frameworks, the “General Data Protection Regulation” and “Loi de Programmation” in particular, that stipulate “explainability” and “understandability” as necessary benchmarks for the use of AI.
format Thesis
id oai:fount.aucegypt.edu:etds-2719
institution American University in Cairo (Egypt)
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:35:51.500Z
license_str Not specified — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from AUC Knowledge Fountain — bepress
publishDate 2021
publishDateRange 2021
publishDateSort 2021
publisher AUC Knowledge Fountain
publisherStr AUC Knowledge Fountain
record_format dspace
source_str AUC Knowledge Fountain — bepress
spelling oai:fount.aucegypt.edu:etds-2719 Finding Neverland? Artificial Intelligence and the Jurisprudence of Legal Certainty Zaky, Omar The development of artificial intelligence (AI) models that are capable of predicting the decisions of prominent courts – most notably the European Court of Human Rights and United States Supreme Court – provides us with an opportunity to revisit important jurisprudential debates regarding the quest for legal certainty. Through providing clear distinctions within formalistic jurisprudence, and its, subsequent, realist critique; this thesis seeks to analyze legal decision-making and its relationship with artificial intelligence. I argue that, AI’s deterministic nature and its support for the law being an “entirely self-contained process” does lend some credence to certain jurisprudential arguments. However, this should not be misconstrued as support for a formalistic approach towards legal certainty. Rather, AI’s empirical attempt at understanding the contributing factors that create a legal decision, reaffirms a functional understanding of the law. Moreover, through highlighting the definitional issues of AI, its problematic facets and existing case law, this thesis seeks to provide a more nuanced comprehension of AI within the legal industry. I further argue that, inversed-AI models possess inherent inadequacies and, consequently, are at fundamental odds with the decision-making process; thus, preventing them from being reliable indicators of AI’s potential in the legal process. This is supported by the emergence of legal frameworks, the “General Data Protection Regulation” and “Loi de Programmation” in particular, that stipulate “explainability” and “understandability” as necessary benchmarks for the use of AI. 2021-12-20T08:00:00Z thesis application/pdf https://fount.aucegypt.edu/etds/1688 https://fount.aucegypt.edu/context/etds/article/2719/viewcontent/omar_hassan_zaky_thesis.pdf Theses and Dissertations AUC Knowledge Fountain jurisprudence artificial intelligence legal decision-making legal certainty Jurisprudence Law
spellingShingle jurisprudence
artificial intelligence
legal decision-making
legal certainty
Jurisprudence
Law
Zaky, Omar
Finding Neverland? Artificial Intelligence and the Jurisprudence of Legal Certainty
title Finding Neverland? Artificial Intelligence and the Jurisprudence of Legal Certainty
title_full Finding Neverland? Artificial Intelligence and the Jurisprudence of Legal Certainty
title_fullStr Finding Neverland? Artificial Intelligence and the Jurisprudence of Legal Certainty
title_full_unstemmed Finding Neverland? Artificial Intelligence and the Jurisprudence of Legal Certainty
title_short Finding Neverland? Artificial Intelligence and the Jurisprudence of Legal Certainty
title_sort finding neverland artificial intelligence and the jurisprudence of legal certainty
topic jurisprudence
artificial intelligence
legal decision-making
legal certainty
Jurisprudence
Law
url https://fount.aucegypt.edu/etds/1688
https://fount.aucegypt.edu/context/etds/article/2719/viewcontent/omar_hassan_zaky_thesis.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT zakyomar findingneverlandartificialintelligenceandthejurisprudenceoflegalcertainty