Full Text Available
Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.
How has the practice of unilateral forcible / military intervention ( as evident by the case of Kosovo, Tanzania, and Russia) eroded the primacy of territorial sovereignty? This question is answered through the use of three different frameworks : 1) legal positivism and 2) normative hierarchy, 3) third world approaches to international law (TWAIL).
The principle of state sovereignty; the right of states to exclusive control over their own territory, is seen as an integral part of the current international order... The whole thesis project revolves around the impact of unilateral humanitarian intervention on the primacy of territorial sovereign...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis |
| Published: |
AUC Knowledge Fountain
2015
|
| Subjects: | |
| Tags: |
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1867613420820365312 |
|---|---|
| access_status_str | Open Access |
| author | Eissa, Sama |
| author_browse | Eissa, Sama |
| author_facet | Eissa, Sama |
| author_sort | Eissa, Sama |
| collection | Thesis |
| description | The principle of state sovereignty; the right of states to exclusive control over their own territory, is seen as an integral part of the current international order... The whole thesis project revolves around the impact of unilateral humanitarian intervention on the primacy of territorial sovereignty. To be more specific, it explores the role played by the emerging norm of unilateral humanitarian intervention and whether or not it washed away the notion of territorial sovereignty mentioned in the UN charter. The main question the thesis project aims to answer is: How has the practice of unilateral forcible / military intervention ( as evident by the case of Kosovo, Tanzania, and Russia) eroded the primacy of territorial sovereignty? This question is answered through the use of three different frameworks : 1) legal positivism and 2) normative hierarchy, 3) third world approaches to international law (TWAIL). |
| format | Thesis |
| id | oai:fount.aucegypt.edu:etds-2823 |
| institution | American University in Cairo (Egypt) |
| last_indexed | 2026-06-10T12:35:51.500Z |
| license_str | Not specified — see source repository |
| provenance_str_mv | Harvested via OAI-PMH from AUC Knowledge Fountain — bepress |
| publishDate | 2015 |
| publishDateRange | 2015 |
| publishDateSort | 2015 |
| publisher | AUC Knowledge Fountain |
| publisherStr | AUC Knowledge Fountain |
| record_format | dspace |
| source_str | AUC Knowledge Fountain — bepress |
| spelling | oai:fount.aucegypt.edu:etds-2823 How has the practice of unilateral forcible / military intervention ( as evident by the case of Kosovo, Tanzania, and Russia) eroded the primacy of territorial sovereignty? This question is answered through the use of three different frameworks : 1) legal positivism and 2) normative hierarchy, 3) third world approaches to international law (TWAIL). Eissa, Sama The principle of state sovereignty; the right of states to exclusive control over their own territory, is seen as an integral part of the current international order... The whole thesis project revolves around the impact of unilateral humanitarian intervention on the primacy of territorial sovereignty. To be more specific, it explores the role played by the emerging norm of unilateral humanitarian intervention and whether or not it washed away the notion of territorial sovereignty mentioned in the UN charter. The main question the thesis project aims to answer is: How has the practice of unilateral forcible / military intervention ( as evident by the case of Kosovo, Tanzania, and Russia) eroded the primacy of territorial sovereignty? This question is answered through the use of three different frameworks : 1) legal positivism and 2) normative hierarchy, 3) third world approaches to international law (TWAIL). 2015-05-29T07:00:00Z thesis application/pdf https://fount.aucegypt.edu/etds/1787 https://fount.aucegypt.edu/context/etds/article/2823/viewcontent/Dar.pdf Theses and Dissertations AUC Knowledge Fountain State sovereignty Unilateral humanitarian intervention Human Rights Law International Humanitarian Law |
| spellingShingle | State sovereignty Unilateral humanitarian intervention Human Rights Law International Humanitarian Law Eissa, Sama How has the practice of unilateral forcible / military intervention ( as evident by the case of Kosovo, Tanzania, and Russia) eroded the primacy of territorial sovereignty? This question is answered through the use of three different frameworks : 1) legal positivism and 2) normative hierarchy, 3) third world approaches to international law (TWAIL). |
| title | How has the practice of unilateral forcible / military intervention ( as evident by the case of Kosovo, Tanzania, and Russia) eroded the primacy of territorial sovereignty? This question is answered through the use of three different frameworks : 1) legal positivism and 2) normative hierarchy, 3) third world approaches to international law (TWAIL). |
| title_full | How has the practice of unilateral forcible / military intervention ( as evident by the case of Kosovo, Tanzania, and Russia) eroded the primacy of territorial sovereignty? This question is answered through the use of three different frameworks : 1) legal positivism and 2) normative hierarchy, 3) third world approaches to international law (TWAIL). |
| title_fullStr | How has the practice of unilateral forcible / military intervention ( as evident by the case of Kosovo, Tanzania, and Russia) eroded the primacy of territorial sovereignty? This question is answered through the use of three different frameworks : 1) legal positivism and 2) normative hierarchy, 3) third world approaches to international law (TWAIL). |
| title_full_unstemmed | How has the practice of unilateral forcible / military intervention ( as evident by the case of Kosovo, Tanzania, and Russia) eroded the primacy of territorial sovereignty? This question is answered through the use of three different frameworks : 1) legal positivism and 2) normative hierarchy, 3) third world approaches to international law (TWAIL). |
| title_short | How has the practice of unilateral forcible / military intervention ( as evident by the case of Kosovo, Tanzania, and Russia) eroded the primacy of territorial sovereignty? This question is answered through the use of three different frameworks : 1) legal positivism and 2) normative hierarchy, 3) third world approaches to international law (TWAIL). |
| title_sort | how has the practice of unilateral forcible military intervention as evident by the case of kosovo tanzania and russia eroded the primacy of territorial sovereignty this question is answered through the use of three different frameworks 1 legal positivism and 2 normative hierarchy 3 third world approaches to international law twail |
| topic | State sovereignty Unilateral humanitarian intervention Human Rights Law International Humanitarian Law |
| url | https://fount.aucegypt.edu/etds/1787 https://fount.aucegypt.edu/context/etds/article/2823/viewcontent/Dar.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT eissasama howhasthepracticeofunilateralforciblemilitaryinterventionasevidentbythecaseofkosovotanzaniaandrussiaerodedtheprimacyofterritorialsovereigntythisquestionisansweredthroughtheuseofthreedifferentframeworks1legalpositivismand2normativehierarchy3thirdworldappro |