Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

The Judicialization of Mega-Politics in Egypt’s Administrative Courts: Insight into The Rulings of the Egyptian State Council (2000-2020)

The interrelationship between law, courts and politics has always been complex and multidimensional. The role and political significance of courts are prominent dimensions of this interrelationship. Over the past decades, there has been global expansion of judicial power, in parallel with the prolif...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bastawisy, Ahmed Kamal
Format: Thesis
Published: AUC Knowledge Fountain 2022
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613421200998400
access_status_str Open Access
author Bastawisy, Ahmed Kamal
author_browse Bastawisy, Ahmed Kamal
author_facet Bastawisy, Ahmed Kamal
author_sort Bastawisy, Ahmed Kamal
collection Thesis
description The interrelationship between law, courts and politics has always been complex and multidimensional. The role and political significance of courts are prominent dimensions of this interrelationship. Over the past decades, there has been global expansion of judicial power, in parallel with the proliferation of modern constitutionalism principles. One of the fundamental manifestations of this trend is the judicialization of politics- the reliance on courts for addressing pivotal social, economic, moral and political controversies and public policy questions. This phenomenon manifests profound transfer of power from representative institutions, mainly legislatures and executives, to judiciaries. Political importance of courts expanded, in scope, to comprise “mega-politics”- the most crucial social, economic predicaments as well as controversies of utmost political prominence that influence the entire society. This research portrays the definitions and explanations of the judicialization of mega-politics globally. Then, analyzes judgments of the Egyptian State Council in the past two decades (2000-2020) to inspect the occurrence, forms and reasons of this phenomenon. The judicialization of pure politics is manifested in three forms, when courts: 1) Narrow the doctrine of sovereignty acts, that are immune of judicial review. 2) Perform explicit judicial law-making 3) Establish/abolish a major public policy. The phenomenon is attributed to institutional factors, mainly the constitutional framework that facilitates judicial activism, besides legal mobilization practiced by activists seeking for social change via strategic litigation. Furthermore, the main driving force behind the phenomenon is the judges’ professional perception of their role as guarantor of rights and liberties and a fundamental constitutional check on the executive authority. This perception is the result of accumulated progressive judicial practice- what I describe as “progressive judicial legacy.”
format Thesis
id oai:fount.aucegypt.edu:etds-2896
institution American University in Cairo (Egypt)
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:35:51.500Z
license_str Not specified — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from AUC Knowledge Fountain — bepress
publishDate 2022
publishDateRange 2022
publishDateSort 2022
publisher AUC Knowledge Fountain
publisherStr AUC Knowledge Fountain
record_format dspace
source_str AUC Knowledge Fountain — bepress
spelling oai:fount.aucegypt.edu:etds-2896 The Judicialization of Mega-Politics in Egypt’s Administrative Courts: Insight into The Rulings of the Egyptian State Council (2000-2020) Bastawisy, Ahmed Kamal The interrelationship between law, courts and politics has always been complex and multidimensional. The role and political significance of courts are prominent dimensions of this interrelationship. Over the past decades, there has been global expansion of judicial power, in parallel with the proliferation of modern constitutionalism principles. One of the fundamental manifestations of this trend is the judicialization of politics- the reliance on courts for addressing pivotal social, economic, moral and political controversies and public policy questions. This phenomenon manifests profound transfer of power from representative institutions, mainly legislatures and executives, to judiciaries. Political importance of courts expanded, in scope, to comprise “mega-politics”- the most crucial social, economic predicaments as well as controversies of utmost political prominence that influence the entire society. This research portrays the definitions and explanations of the judicialization of mega-politics globally. Then, analyzes judgments of the Egyptian State Council in the past two decades (2000-2020) to inspect the occurrence, forms and reasons of this phenomenon. The judicialization of pure politics is manifested in three forms, when courts: 1) Narrow the doctrine of sovereignty acts, that are immune of judicial review. 2) Perform explicit judicial law-making 3) Establish/abolish a major public policy. The phenomenon is attributed to institutional factors, mainly the constitutional framework that facilitates judicial activism, besides legal mobilization practiced by activists seeking for social change via strategic litigation. Furthermore, the main driving force behind the phenomenon is the judges’ professional perception of their role as guarantor of rights and liberties and a fundamental constitutional check on the executive authority. This perception is the result of accumulated progressive judicial practice- what I describe as “progressive judicial legacy.” 2022-01-31T08:00:00Z thesis application/pdf https://fount.aucegypt.edu/etds/1877 https://fount.aucegypt.edu/context/etds/article/2896/viewcontent/Ahmed_Kamal_Bastawisy_Thesis.pdf Theses and Dissertations AUC Knowledge Fountain State Council administrative courts judicialization of politics judicialization of mega-politics pure politics judicial politics law and courts acts of sovereignty judicial role Administrative Law Courts Judges Jurisdiction Law Law and Politics
spellingShingle State Council
administrative courts
judicialization of politics
judicialization of mega-politics
pure politics
judicial politics
law and courts
acts of sovereignty
judicial role
Administrative Law
Courts
Judges
Jurisdiction
Law
Law and Politics
Bastawisy, Ahmed Kamal
The Judicialization of Mega-Politics in Egypt’s Administrative Courts: Insight into The Rulings of the Egyptian State Council (2000-2020)
title The Judicialization of Mega-Politics in Egypt’s Administrative Courts: Insight into The Rulings of the Egyptian State Council (2000-2020)
title_full The Judicialization of Mega-Politics in Egypt’s Administrative Courts: Insight into The Rulings of the Egyptian State Council (2000-2020)
title_fullStr The Judicialization of Mega-Politics in Egypt’s Administrative Courts: Insight into The Rulings of the Egyptian State Council (2000-2020)
title_full_unstemmed The Judicialization of Mega-Politics in Egypt’s Administrative Courts: Insight into The Rulings of the Egyptian State Council (2000-2020)
title_short The Judicialization of Mega-Politics in Egypt’s Administrative Courts: Insight into The Rulings of the Egyptian State Council (2000-2020)
title_sort judicialization of mega politics in egypt s administrative courts insight into the rulings of the egyptian state council 2000 2020
topic State Council
administrative courts
judicialization of politics
judicialization of mega-politics
pure politics
judicial politics
law and courts
acts of sovereignty
judicial role
Administrative Law
Courts
Judges
Jurisdiction
Law
Law and Politics
url https://fount.aucegypt.edu/etds/1877
https://fount.aucegypt.edu/context/etds/article/2896/viewcontent/Ahmed_Kamal_Bastawisy_Thesis.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT bastawisyahmedkamal thejudicializationofmegapoliticsinegyptsadministrativecourtsinsightintotherulingsoftheegyptianstatecouncil20002020
AT bastawisyahmedkamal judicializationofmegapoliticsinegyptsadministrativecourtsinsightintotherulingsoftheegyptianstatecouncil20002020