Full Text Available
Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.
Towards A Structural Judicial Approach in The Egyptian Administrative Courts: Proportionality as A Practical Solution
The lack of detailed and explicit law provisions governing human rights cases obliges judges to fill this legal gap by applying generic constitutional articles. Now that all human rights are interdependent and overlapping, they practically conflict with each other. Therefore, Egyptian judges are obl...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis |
| Published: |
AUC Knowledge Fountain
2023
|
| Subjects: | |
| Tags: |
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items: Towards A Structural Judicial Approach in The Egyptian Administrative Courts: Proportionality as A Practical Solution
- Freedom of belief at the crossroad of civilisations - an Islamic perspective and its impact on Africa : the cases of Egypt and Nigeria
- Freedom of information law enforcement in Nigeria: emerging issues from court cases
- Proportionality v. Categorization: The Issue of Judicial Balancing of Rights
- An analysis of the conflict between freedom of expression and trademark protection
- Who is watching who? Regulation of media and freedom of expression in Uganda : a critical analysis of the Press and Journalists Act of 1995
- Security and Terrorism Vs Free Expression: Analytical Study on The European Court of Human Rights