Full Text Available
Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.
Proportionality v. Categorization: The Issue of Judicial Balancing of Rights
The fact that there is a constant conflict between individual rights and state or social interests has historically provoked the question of how to balance or harmonize such conflicting interests? On what basis shall the legislator or the judge decide in favor of this or that right in his legislatio...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis |
| Published: |
AUC Knowledge Fountain
2023
|
| Subjects: | |
| Tags: |
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items: Proportionality v. Categorization: The Issue of Judicial Balancing of Rights
- Egyptian Public Economic Policies Between the Supreme Constitutional Court and the State
- The international human rights law as a source of law in the Burundian judicial system
- Emergency-Use Vaccine Mandates and Bodily Integrity: Assessing the Validity of Proportionality Test in Legal Frameworks
- The Sealed Palace: How Direct Access to the Supreme Constitutional Court Can Bridge the Gaps in Constitutional Review in Egypt
- IMF's Loan Conditionality: Negative Consequences in the Borrower Country and the Burden of Responsibility
- Security and Terrorism Vs Free Expression: Analytical Study on The European Court of Human Rights