Full Text Available
Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.
Rebalancing the Scales: A Comparative Study Between Egyptian Contract Law’s Rules on Unequal Contracts and the American Unconscionability Doctrine
Traditionally, contracts were envisioned as pacts struck between equals. Their enforcement was considered a form of honoring the free will and autonomy of the parties. This theoretical imagination is no longer valid today; the concentration of wealth and power in the hands of some individuals or ins...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis |
| Published: |
AUC Knowledge Fountain
2024
|
| Subjects: | |
| Tags: |
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1867613423929393152 |
|---|---|
| access_status_str | Open Access |
| author | Elnemr, Yousef Samir |
| author_browse | Elnemr, Yousef Samir |
| author_facet | Elnemr, Yousef Samir |
| author_sort | Elnemr, Yousef Samir |
| collection | Thesis |
| description | Traditionally, contracts were envisioned as pacts struck between equals. Their enforcement was considered a form of honoring the free will and autonomy of the parties. This theoretical imagination is no longer valid today; the concentration of wealth and power in the hands of some individuals or institutions means they can name their terms and force the other party between taking or leaving it. When the need to contract is pressing, the weaker party is forced to accept any imposed terms. Thus, strict enforcement of contractual terms helps the powerful further their interests at the expense of their helpless partners. Today, the law, including Egyptian law, recognizes this situation and intervenes in those unequal contracts to rebalance the scales tipped by inequality. This paper examines the Egyptian Civil Code’s general rules designed to protect weaker contractual parties and suggests reforms to enhance their functionality. It begins by exploring contracts’ source of obligatory power advocating the theory of “Equality in Exchange” which suggests that contract enforceability can only be morally grounded in the fairness of its terms. Next, it presents the relevant rules of the Civil Code and notes the mediocre results of their practical application. Then, an overview of the American doctrine of unconscionability is presented to showcase how the same issues are handled in the legal system of one of the most powerful modern economies. Finally, reforms are suggested to the Egyptian Civil Code to empower courts to protect weaker contractual parties. |
| format | Thesis |
| id | oai:fount.aucegypt.edu:etds-3337 |
| institution | American University in Cairo (Egypt) |
| last_indexed | 2026-06-10T12:35:55.364Z |
| license_str | Not specified — see source repository |
| provenance_str_mv | Harvested via OAI-PMH from AUC Knowledge Fountain — bepress |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| publishDateRange | 2024 |
| publishDateSort | 2024 |
| publisher | AUC Knowledge Fountain |
| publisherStr | AUC Knowledge Fountain |
| record_format | dspace |
| source_str | AUC Knowledge Fountain — bepress |
| spelling | oai:fount.aucegypt.edu:etds-3337 Rebalancing the Scales: A Comparative Study Between Egyptian Contract Law’s Rules on Unequal Contracts and the American Unconscionability Doctrine Elnemr, Yousef Samir Traditionally, contracts were envisioned as pacts struck between equals. Their enforcement was considered a form of honoring the free will and autonomy of the parties. This theoretical imagination is no longer valid today; the concentration of wealth and power in the hands of some individuals or institutions means they can name their terms and force the other party between taking or leaving it. When the need to contract is pressing, the weaker party is forced to accept any imposed terms. Thus, strict enforcement of contractual terms helps the powerful further their interests at the expense of their helpless partners. Today, the law, including Egyptian law, recognizes this situation and intervenes in those unequal contracts to rebalance the scales tipped by inequality. This paper examines the Egyptian Civil Code’s general rules designed to protect weaker contractual parties and suggests reforms to enhance their functionality. It begins by exploring contracts’ source of obligatory power advocating the theory of “Equality in Exchange” which suggests that contract enforceability can only be morally grounded in the fairness of its terms. Next, it presents the relevant rules of the Civil Code and notes the mediocre results of their practical application. Then, an overview of the American doctrine of unconscionability is presented to showcase how the same issues are handled in the legal system of one of the most powerful modern economies. Finally, reforms are suggested to the Egyptian Civil Code to empower courts to protect weaker contractual parties. 2024-06-15T07:00:00Z thesis application/pdf https://fount.aucegypt.edu/etds/2295 https://fount.aucegypt.edu/context/etds/article/3337/viewcontent/Youssef_Samir_Elnemr_Thesis.pdf Theses and Dissertations AUC Knowledge Fountain Egyptian Contract Law The Egyptian Civil Code Unequal Contracts Equality in Exchange Exploitation Adhesion Contracts Lesion Unconscionability Legal Reform |
| spellingShingle | Egyptian Contract Law The Egyptian Civil Code Unequal Contracts Equality in Exchange Exploitation Adhesion Contracts Lesion Unconscionability Legal Reform Elnemr, Yousef Samir Rebalancing the Scales: A Comparative Study Between Egyptian Contract Law’s Rules on Unequal Contracts and the American Unconscionability Doctrine |
| title | Rebalancing the Scales: A Comparative Study Between Egyptian Contract Law’s Rules on Unequal Contracts and the American Unconscionability Doctrine |
| title_full | Rebalancing the Scales: A Comparative Study Between Egyptian Contract Law’s Rules on Unequal Contracts and the American Unconscionability Doctrine |
| title_fullStr | Rebalancing the Scales: A Comparative Study Between Egyptian Contract Law’s Rules on Unequal Contracts and the American Unconscionability Doctrine |
| title_full_unstemmed | Rebalancing the Scales: A Comparative Study Between Egyptian Contract Law’s Rules on Unequal Contracts and the American Unconscionability Doctrine |
| title_short | Rebalancing the Scales: A Comparative Study Between Egyptian Contract Law’s Rules on Unequal Contracts and the American Unconscionability Doctrine |
| title_sort | rebalancing the scales a comparative study between egyptian contract law s rules on unequal contracts and the american unconscionability doctrine |
| topic | Egyptian Contract Law The Egyptian Civil Code Unequal Contracts Equality in Exchange Exploitation Adhesion Contracts Lesion Unconscionability Legal Reform |
| url | https://fount.aucegypt.edu/etds/2295 https://fount.aucegypt.edu/context/etds/article/3337/viewcontent/Youssef_Samir_Elnemr_Thesis.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT elnemryousefsamir rebalancingthescalesacomparativestudybetweenegyptiancontractlawsrulesonunequalcontractsandtheamericanunconscionabilitydoctrine |