Full Text Available
Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.
The European Union has provided various democracy aid programs to Egypt since 2013, yet the country’s democracy index has gone down since then[1]. Despite the stagnation in the trajectory of democratization, the EU expanded its democracy promotion aid programs in 2016 to encompass the independent cu...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis |
| Published: |
AUC Knowledge Fountain
2024
|
| Subjects: | |
| Tags: |
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | The European Union has provided various democracy aid programs to Egypt since 2013, yet the country’s democracy index has gone down since then[1]. Despite the stagnation in the trajectory of democratization, the EU expanded its democracy promotion aid programs in 2016 to encompass the independent cultural scene in Egypt. This thesis critically examines the reasons for the stagnation of democratization processes in Egypt, a MENA country that continues to be a recipient of the EU’s democracy promotion programs. It argues that there is a discrepancy between the EU’s stated democracy promotion rhetoric and its actions, a factor that necessitates a more transparent approach. More importantly, this dissertation uses the independent cultural sector as a mediator of democracy promotion. It does so by specifically studying the EU’s cultural diplomacy, exploring how the interactions between the EU cultural institutions and the independent cultural scene in Egypt contribute to democracy promotion. The study’s data relies on semi-structured interviews with 32 participants representing EU diplomats and Egyptian cultural artists to assess the European-Egyptian Cultural Programme from 2019 to 2023 as a case study. The findings reveal that EU cultural institutions, in their words, seem to be promoting democracy, while in their actions, they do not. On the receiving end, the Egyptian cultural actors and artists, while not openly opposing the Egyptian regime, are actively promoting democratic norms. They strategically accept EU funding while taking a critical stance towards the EU agenda and the Egyptian regime, showcasing their agency.
[1] See world data democracy index here: https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/democracy-index-eiu?tab=chart&country=~EGY last checked on 28 May 2024 |
|---|