Full Text Available
Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.
This thesis examines the divergent democratization trajectories of Botswana and Nigeria, focusing on the role of colonial legacies and post-colonial elites in shaping elite cohesion. While both countries experienced British colonial rule, their transitions to democracy in the post-independence perio...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis |
| Published: |
AUC Knowledge Fountain
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Tags: |
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | This thesis examines the divergent democratization trajectories of Botswana and Nigeria, focusing on the role of colonial legacies and post-colonial elites in shaping elite cohesion. While both countries experienced British colonial rule, their transitions to democracy in the post-independence period have differed significantly. This study argues that elite cohesion, although insufficient on its own, is a critical facilitating factor in democratic consolidation that warrants greater attention in the democratization literature. This cohesion is largely shaped by the sociology of political elites, with historical contexts influencing how elites organize. Through process tracing, the thesis argues that colonialism in Botswana did not fragment elites to the extent seen in Nigeria, where British divide-and-rule strategies fostered deep ethnic, regional, and religious cleavages. In contrast, Botswana’s relatively homogenous elite structure and limited colonial interference allowed for a smoother transition to democracy. In that sense, the thesis attempted to integrate elite cohesion as well as sociology of political elites into already existing models of democratization. |
|---|