Full Text Available
Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.
Implications of the Mind’s Active Participation in the Formation of Perception
The mind-body problem, particularly the issue of qualia, remains a fundamental challenge in understanding the nature of the mind and its relation to the body. In this thesis I argue that the problem is epistemic, stemming from how we perceive and know ourselves as physical and mental beings. This ar...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis |
| Published: |
AUC Knowledge Fountain
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Tags: |
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1867613425153081344 |
|---|---|
| access_status_str | Open Access |
| author | Michael, Maikel Adel Samy |
| author_browse | Michael, Maikel Adel Samy |
| author_facet | Michael, Maikel Adel Samy |
| author_sort | Michael, Maikel Adel Samy |
| collection | Thesis |
| description | The mind-body problem, particularly the issue of qualia, remains a fundamental challenge in understanding the nature of the mind and its relation to the body. In this thesis I argue that the problem is epistemic, stemming from how we perceive and know ourselves as physical and mental beings. This argument will be explored through the respective of idealisms proposed by George Berkeley and Immanuel Kant. Berkeley's idealism suggests that reality is rooted in perception, offering a major steppingstone by demonstrating the major role perception plays in understanding and acquiring knowledge. Kant contributes by asserting that the "thing-in-itself" is beyond our empirical grasp, and our perceptions do not fully represent the mind's true nature. Our understanding is limited to phenomena, not noumena, leading to the persistence of the explanatory gap. In this thesis I propose that this limitation might be evolutionarily advantageous, as the mind evolved as a survival tool rather than a means for uncovering ultimate truths. This perspective suggests that our restricted perceptive access has evolved to prioritize survival through recognizing faces, dangers, and the like, rather than exploring the deepest truths of our nature and reality. Thus, the mind-body problem reflects the inherent limitations of human perception and knowledge in the pursuit of understanding our fundamental nature. |
| format | Thesis |
| id | oai:fount.aucegypt.edu:etds-3557 |
| institution | American University in Cairo (Egypt) |
| last_indexed | 2026-06-10T12:35:56.457Z |
| license_str | Not specified — see source repository |
| provenance_str_mv | Harvested via OAI-PMH from AUC Knowledge Fountain — bepress |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| publishDateRange | 2025 |
| publishDateSort | 2025 |
| publisher | AUC Knowledge Fountain |
| publisherStr | AUC Knowledge Fountain |
| record_format | dspace |
| source_str | AUC Knowledge Fountain — bepress |
| spelling | oai:fount.aucegypt.edu:etds-3557 Implications of the Mind’s Active Participation in the Formation of Perception Michael, Maikel Adel Samy The mind-body problem, particularly the issue of qualia, remains a fundamental challenge in understanding the nature of the mind and its relation to the body. In this thesis I argue that the problem is epistemic, stemming from how we perceive and know ourselves as physical and mental beings. This argument will be explored through the respective of idealisms proposed by George Berkeley and Immanuel Kant. Berkeley's idealism suggests that reality is rooted in perception, offering a major steppingstone by demonstrating the major role perception plays in understanding and acquiring knowledge. Kant contributes by asserting that the "thing-in-itself" is beyond our empirical grasp, and our perceptions do not fully represent the mind's true nature. Our understanding is limited to phenomena, not noumena, leading to the persistence of the explanatory gap. In this thesis I propose that this limitation might be evolutionarily advantageous, as the mind evolved as a survival tool rather than a means for uncovering ultimate truths. This perspective suggests that our restricted perceptive access has evolved to prioritize survival through recognizing faces, dangers, and the like, rather than exploring the deepest truths of our nature and reality. Thus, the mind-body problem reflects the inherent limitations of human perception and knowledge in the pursuit of understanding our fundamental nature. 2025-06-18T07:00:00Z thesis application/pdf https://fount.aucegypt.edu/etds/2509 https://fount.aucegypt.edu/context/etds/article/3557/viewcontent/Maikel_AdelSamy_Michael_thesis.pdf Theses and Dissertations AUC Knowledge Fountain Mind-Body Problem Qualia Philosophy of Mind Immanuel Kant George Berkeley Perception Idealism Physicalism Cartesian Dualism Philosophy of Mind |
| spellingShingle | Mind-Body Problem Qualia Philosophy of Mind Immanuel Kant George Berkeley Perception Idealism Physicalism Cartesian Dualism Philosophy of Mind Michael, Maikel Adel Samy Implications of the Mind’s Active Participation in the Formation of Perception |
| title | Implications of the Mind’s Active Participation in the Formation of Perception |
| title_full | Implications of the Mind’s Active Participation in the Formation of Perception |
| title_fullStr | Implications of the Mind’s Active Participation in the Formation of Perception |
| title_full_unstemmed | Implications of the Mind’s Active Participation in the Formation of Perception |
| title_short | Implications of the Mind’s Active Participation in the Formation of Perception |
| title_sort | implications of the mind s active participation in the formation of perception |
| topic | Mind-Body Problem Qualia Philosophy of Mind Immanuel Kant George Berkeley Perception Idealism Physicalism Cartesian Dualism Philosophy of Mind |
| url | https://fount.aucegypt.edu/etds/2509 https://fount.aucegypt.edu/context/etds/article/3557/viewcontent/Maikel_AdelSamy_Michael_thesis.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT michaelmaikeladelsamy implicationsofthemindsactiveparticipationintheformationofperception |