Full Text Available
Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.
This thesis explores the tragedy of incommensurability between indigenous rights and international human rights law. Despite the emergence of frameworks like the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), indigenous calls for sovereignty remain fundamentally unintelligi...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis |
| Published: |
AUC Knowledge Fountain
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Tags: |
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1867613425392156672 |
|---|---|
| access_status_str | Open Access |
| author | Ali, Zeina |
| author_browse | Ali, Zeina |
| author_facet | Ali, Zeina |
| author_sort | Ali, Zeina |
| collection | Thesis |
| description | This thesis explores the tragedy of incommensurability between indigenous rights and international human rights law. Despite the emergence of frameworks like the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), indigenous calls for sovereignty remain fundamentally unintelligible within a liberal order structured to preserve settler-state legitimacy. Tracing the historical and theoretical evolution of indigenous advocacy, this study critiques the strategic shift from demands for self-determination to claims of cultural rights. It argues that this shift offers no real alternative: self-determination and cultural rights are functionally equivalent, as both are ultimately filtered through legal and political frameworks that cannot encapsulate the ethos of indigenous autonomy, history, or relationality. International human rights law, built on liberal universalism, tolerates indigeneity only when stripped of its political substance and assimilated into state structures. Through an analysis of legal theory, settler-state practices such as federal recognition, and movements like #NoDAPL, this thesis demonstrates that the promise of rights is not liberation but continued containment. True indigenous emancipation demands a radical reimagining beyond the human rights paradigm, rejecting frameworks that render sovereignty perpetually deferred or domesticated. |
| format | Thesis |
| id | oai:fount.aucegypt.edu:etds-3597 |
| institution | American University in Cairo (Egypt) |
| last_indexed | 2026-06-10T12:35:56.457Z |
| license_str | Not specified — see source repository |
| provenance_str_mv | Harvested via OAI-PMH from AUC Knowledge Fountain — bepress |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| publishDateRange | 2025 |
| publishDateSort | 2025 |
| publisher | AUC Knowledge Fountain |
| publisherStr | AUC Knowledge Fountain |
| record_format | dspace |
| source_str | AUC Knowledge Fountain — bepress |
| spelling | oai:fount.aucegypt.edu:etds-3597 A Tragedy of Incommensurability: Indigenous Rights and the Limits of Human Rights Law Ali, Zeina This thesis explores the tragedy of incommensurability between indigenous rights and international human rights law. Despite the emergence of frameworks like the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), indigenous calls for sovereignty remain fundamentally unintelligible within a liberal order structured to preserve settler-state legitimacy. Tracing the historical and theoretical evolution of indigenous advocacy, this study critiques the strategic shift from demands for self-determination to claims of cultural rights. It argues that this shift offers no real alternative: self-determination and cultural rights are functionally equivalent, as both are ultimately filtered through legal and political frameworks that cannot encapsulate the ethos of indigenous autonomy, history, or relationality. International human rights law, built on liberal universalism, tolerates indigeneity only when stripped of its political substance and assimilated into state structures. Through an analysis of legal theory, settler-state practices such as federal recognition, and movements like #NoDAPL, this thesis demonstrates that the promise of rights is not liberation but continued containment. True indigenous emancipation demands a radical reimagining beyond the human rights paradigm, rejecting frameworks that render sovereignty perpetually deferred or domesticated. 2025-06-18T07:00:00Z thesis application/pdf https://fount.aucegypt.edu/etds/2547 https://fount.aucegypt.edu/context/etds/article/3597/viewcontent/auto_convert.pdf Theses and Dissertations AUC Knowledge Fountain Indigenous rights self-determination cultural rights politics of recognition settler colonialism human rights law justice theory liberal legalism critical legal studies United States Civil Rights and Discrimination Environmental Law Human Rights Law Indigenous, Indian, and Aboriginal Law International Humanitarian Law International Law Law and Philosophy Law and Politics Political Theory Politics and Social Change Rule of Law Social Justice Sociology of Culture |
| spellingShingle | Indigenous rights self-determination cultural rights politics of recognition settler colonialism human rights law justice theory liberal legalism critical legal studies United States Civil Rights and Discrimination Environmental Law Human Rights Law Indigenous, Indian, and Aboriginal Law International Humanitarian Law International Law Law and Philosophy Law and Politics Political Theory Politics and Social Change Rule of Law Social Justice Sociology of Culture Ali, Zeina A Tragedy of Incommensurability: Indigenous Rights and the Limits of Human Rights Law |
| title | A Tragedy of Incommensurability: Indigenous Rights and the Limits of Human Rights Law |
| title_full | A Tragedy of Incommensurability: Indigenous Rights and the Limits of Human Rights Law |
| title_fullStr | A Tragedy of Incommensurability: Indigenous Rights and the Limits of Human Rights Law |
| title_full_unstemmed | A Tragedy of Incommensurability: Indigenous Rights and the Limits of Human Rights Law |
| title_short | A Tragedy of Incommensurability: Indigenous Rights and the Limits of Human Rights Law |
| title_sort | tragedy of incommensurability indigenous rights and the limits of human rights law |
| topic | Indigenous rights self-determination cultural rights politics of recognition settler colonialism human rights law justice theory liberal legalism critical legal studies United States Civil Rights and Discrimination Environmental Law Human Rights Law Indigenous, Indian, and Aboriginal Law International Humanitarian Law International Law Law and Philosophy Law and Politics Political Theory Politics and Social Change Rule of Law Social Justice Sociology of Culture |
| url | https://fount.aucegypt.edu/etds/2547 https://fount.aucegypt.edu/context/etds/article/3597/viewcontent/auto_convert.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT alizeina atragedyofincommensurabilityindigenousrightsandthelimitsofhumanrightslaw AT alizeina tragedyofincommensurabilityindigenousrightsandthelimitsofhumanrightslaw |