Full Text Available
Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.
Work Precarity, Mental Health, and Performance among Humanitarian Aid Workers in Egypt Post-2025 U.S. Funding Reduction
The humanitarian sector is increasingly characterized by precarious employment conditions and work precarity, including short-term contracts, unclear renewal terms, inadequate compensation, heavy workloads, and job insecurity, exacerbated by volatile donor funding. The 2025 U.S. funding cuts have in...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis |
| Published: |
AUC Knowledge Fountain
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Tags: |
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | The humanitarian sector is increasingly characterized by precarious employment conditions and work precarity, including short-term contracts, unclear renewal terms, inadequate compensation, heavy workloads, and job insecurity, exacerbated by volatile donor funding. The 2025 U.S. funding cuts have intensified these vulnerabilities, particularly in countries like Egypt, with massive humanitarian operations because of being a significant destination for asylum applications and one of the largest refugee host countries. Despite the prevalence of precarious work in the humanitarian sector, limited research examines its effects on workers' mental health and work performance, especially during funding crises. This qualitative study explores the perceived effect of precarious employment and work precarity on 18 Egyptian humanitarian aid workers following the 2025 U.S. funding cuts. The research examines how employment conditions affect workers' psychological well-being and professional effectiveness and identifies moderating factors at the organizational and individual levels. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with Egyptian humanitarian workers employed by international and non-governmental organizations affected by the cut.
Findings revealed that participants' awareness of precarity evolved through employment experience, with stress intensifying during contract renewals and peaking following the 2025 U.S. funding cuts, which affected all workers directly or indirectly. Five dimensions of precarious employment—contract type, contract continuity, inadequate compensation, heavy workload, and intrinsic job features—shaped workers' experiences, alongside an unanticipated factor: discrimination across contract types and between local and international staff. Based on the perceptions of the humanitarian aid workers interviewed, precarious conditions negatively impacted mental health, work performance, workplace environment, daily life, future planning, and personal relationships. Contrary to expectations, organizational responses to funding cuts—rather than the cuts themselves—emerged as the primary exacerbating factor. Identified moderating factors focused primarily on mitigating precarity's impacts rather than addressing root causes, with individual coping strategies centered on personal safety nets rather than organizational support.
This study provides empirical evidence on the relationship between precarious employment and worker mental well-being in the humanitarian sector, extends precarious employment theory to this unique context, and offers practical recommendations for organizations and policymakers to address workforce precarity and improve employment sustainability in humanitarian work. |
|---|