Full Text Available
Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.
Is the definition of "permanent establishment", as used in the double tax agreements of selected 'oil rich' central and North African countries, sufficient to protect the taxing rights on the natural resources of these countries?
Includes abstract.
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Thesis |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
College of Accounting
2014
|
| Subjects: | |
| Tags: |
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items: Is the definition of "permanent establishment", as used in the double tax agreements of selected 'oil rich' central and North African countries, sufficient to protect the taxing rights on the natural resources of these countries?
- Is the definition of "permanent establishment" ("PE"), as used in the Double Tax Agreements ("DTA's") of selected Southern African Development Community ("SADC") countries, sufficient to protect their taxing rights over their natural resources?
- Africa and the taxation of permanent establishments: Is the definition of "permanent establishment" as used in the double tax agreements of selected 'fishing rich' African countries sufficient to protect the taxing rights on those diminishing natural resources?
- Natural resource protection through double tax agreements in the East African community: a critical analysis of whether Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda have sufficiently protected the taxing rights over natural resources within their Double Tax Treaty Network
- An insight into the development of the royalty definition contained in modern model tax conventions and the evolution of the international tax meaning of 'beneficial ownership'
- The impact of e-commerce on the permanent establishment definition
- The role of tax instruments in reducing emissions from electricity generation in selected developing countries : a comparative study