Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

A comparative analysis of the concept of fiscal jurisdiction in income tax law

Bibliography: leaves 324-333.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ketchemin, Eric P
Other Authors: Davis, Dennis
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: Department of Commercial Law 2015
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613143621959680
access_status_str Open Access
author Ketchemin, Eric P
author2 Davis, Dennis
author_browse Davis, Dennis
Ketchemin, Eric P
author_facet Davis, Dennis
Ketchemin, Eric P
author_sort Ketchemin, Eric P
collection Thesis
description Bibliography: leaves 324-333.
format Thesis
id oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/11303
institution University of Cape Town (South Africa)
language eng
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:31:28.055Z
license_str Not specified — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
publishDate 2015
publishDateRange 2015
publishDateSort 2015
publisher Department of Commercial Law
publisherStr Department of Commercial Law
record_format dspace
source_str UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
spelling oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/11303 A comparative analysis of the concept of fiscal jurisdiction in income tax law Ketchemin, Eric P Davis, Dennis Commercial Law Bibliography: leaves 324-333. The purpose of this dissertation is to analyse the definitional rules of fiscal jurisdiction as well as the tax consequences resulting from the application of these rules, as implemented in the national tax law of the chosen jurisdictions. In essence, there are two main rules, which give content to the chosen theory of fiscal jurisdiction, mainly source and residence. It is trite that globalisation of the world's economies poses certain problems for international tax policy. Companies and individuals are becoming more mobile and therefore are able to exploit tax differences between states. In consideration of the natural concern of governments that they should get an acceptable share of the profits generated by international businesses, this research study analyses the bases through which a country could claim the right to tax. The plasticity of these two key concepts (source and residence) may well subvert a country's ultimate tax objective because of the potential for exploitation of ambiguity in the search for effective avoidance. The residence tax system and its implications have been analysed mainly from the South African perspective, and where necessary, the analysis has sought reference in other jurisdictions such as the United Kingdom and the United States. The source principle of taxation and its effects have also been studied from the South African context, with a comparative approach from Hong Kong. It has been found that the countries considered in this research have, in various ways, adopted different combinations of subjective factors for tax liability in their domestic tax laws. At the same time, the relentless search of additional tax revenue, has led countries to implement in their tax laws, stringent anti-avoidance measures designed to prevent the deferral of tax, for instance on foreign source income. Factors such as the increasing complexity of modem business and the greater sophistication of tax planning techniques have contributed to this state of affairs. Thus, this dissertation highlights that competition between governments, in the face of international economic integrity, may lead countries to adopt tax rules, which though they follow the usual international standards, are nevertheless very complex in application and administration. This can maintain the problem of international double taxation and lead to excessive or unpredictable compliance burdens. It is shown how countries in the exercise of their fiscal jurisdiction can move towards harmonisation of rules and common interpretation of the tax base in the application of their national tax legislation. 2015-01-04T14:44:53Z 2015-01-04T14:44:53Z 2002 Master Thesis Masters LLD http://hdl.handle.net/11427/11303 eng application/pdf Department of Commercial Law Faculty of Law University of Cape Town
spellingShingle Commercial Law
Ketchemin, Eric P
A comparative analysis of the concept of fiscal jurisdiction in income tax law
thesis_degree_str Master's
title A comparative analysis of the concept of fiscal jurisdiction in income tax law
title_full A comparative analysis of the concept of fiscal jurisdiction in income tax law
title_fullStr A comparative analysis of the concept of fiscal jurisdiction in income tax law
title_full_unstemmed A comparative analysis of the concept of fiscal jurisdiction in income tax law
title_short A comparative analysis of the concept of fiscal jurisdiction in income tax law
title_sort comparative analysis of the concept of fiscal jurisdiction in income tax law
topic Commercial Law
url http://hdl.handle.net/11427/11303
work_keys_str_mv AT ketcheminericp acomparativeanalysisoftheconceptoffiscaljurisdictioninincometaxlaw
AT ketcheminericp comparativeanalysisoftheconceptoffiscaljurisdictioninincometaxlaw