Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

Does the lack of sufficient formulation and articulation of principles guiding the limits of the Constitutional Court undermine its legitimacy?

Includes bibliographical references.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Naidoo, Sherilyn Shale
Other Authors: Corder, Hugh
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: Department of Public Law 2015
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613171809779712
access_status_str Open Access
author Naidoo, Sherilyn Shale
author2 Corder, Hugh
author_browse Corder, Hugh
Naidoo, Sherilyn Shale
author_facet Corder, Hugh
Naidoo, Sherilyn Shale
author_sort Naidoo, Sherilyn Shale
collection Thesis
description Includes bibliographical references.
format Thesis
id oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/12971
institution University of Cape Town (South Africa)
language eng
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:31:54.917Z
license_str Not specified — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
publishDate 2015
publishDateRange 2015
publishDateSort 2015
publisher Department of Public Law
publisherStr Department of Public Law
record_format dspace
source_str UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
spelling oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/12971 Does the lack of sufficient formulation and articulation of principles guiding the limits of the Constitutional Court undermine its legitimacy? Naidoo, Sherilyn Shale Corder, Hugh Constitutional Law Includes bibliographical references. It is not simply enough to have a separation of powers written on paper. In this paper I shall look at the pragmatic approach adopted by the Constitutional Court when adjudicating upon executive and legislative power in order to ensure its institutional security and legitimacy. I shall evaluate throughout this paper how the lack of sufficiently and consistently formulating and articulating principles that guide the Constitutional Court’s own limits could actually undermine the Court’s legitimacy in our current political climate. 2015-05-28T07:01:19Z 2015-05-28T07:01:19Z 2014 Master Thesis Masters LLM http://hdl.handle.net/11427/12971 eng application/pdf Department of Public Law Faculty of Law University of Cape Town
spellingShingle Constitutional Law
Naidoo, Sherilyn Shale
Does the lack of sufficient formulation and articulation of principles guiding the limits of the Constitutional Court undermine its legitimacy?
thesis_degree_str Master's
title Does the lack of sufficient formulation and articulation of principles guiding the limits of the Constitutional Court undermine its legitimacy?
title_full Does the lack of sufficient formulation and articulation of principles guiding the limits of the Constitutional Court undermine its legitimacy?
title_fullStr Does the lack of sufficient formulation and articulation of principles guiding the limits of the Constitutional Court undermine its legitimacy?
title_full_unstemmed Does the lack of sufficient formulation and articulation of principles guiding the limits of the Constitutional Court undermine its legitimacy?
title_short Does the lack of sufficient formulation and articulation of principles guiding the limits of the Constitutional Court undermine its legitimacy?
title_sort does the lack of sufficient formulation and articulation of principles guiding the limits of the constitutional court undermine its legitimacy
topic Constitutional Law
url http://hdl.handle.net/11427/12971
work_keys_str_mv AT naidoosherilynshale doesthelackofsufficientformulationandarticulationofprinciplesguidingthelimitsoftheconstitutionalcourtundermineitslegitimacy