Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

Revisiting human responsibilities: prospects and challenges

Since the drafting of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) (1948), the extent to which individuals should bear responsibilities for the fulfilment of universal human rights has been a contentiously debated subject. Despite conflicting value-based claims, the approach of international hum...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Smith, Liesl Ann Lynn
Other Authors: Akokpari, John
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: Department of Political Studies 2015
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613204520108032
access_status_str Open Access
author Smith, Liesl Ann Lynn
author2 Akokpari, John
author_browse Akokpari, John
Smith, Liesl Ann Lynn
author_facet Akokpari, John
Smith, Liesl Ann Lynn
author_sort Smith, Liesl Ann Lynn
collection Thesis
description Since the drafting of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) (1948), the extent to which individuals should bear responsibilities for the fulfilment of universal human rights has been a contentiously debated subject. Despite conflicting value-based claims, the approach of international human rights law traditionally has been to recognise states as primary obligation bearers. While the UDHR focuses primarily on state obligations, deliberately unspecified duties of individuals are included under Article 29(1). The meaning of these duties has remained contested, often by relativist critics claiming that a stronger focus on responsibilities would provide a more balanced approach to human rights. The end of the Cold War brought a renewed interest in the normative potential of human rights and a parallel renewal of relativist objections to the universality of the UDHR. In this context transnational campaigns have emerged to advocate for a universal declaration of human responsibilities complementary to the UDHR. The issue has received attention from a number of initiatives, including those of United Nations bodies and agencies and of nongovernmental organisations. The most prominent of these initiatives have received firm opposition from influential Western state and non-state actors. Approaching the topic from a constructivist perspective, this dissertation draws on the social movement literature on the international political opportunity structure to argue that the activities of opponents to human responsibilities initiatives, particularly their framing of human responsibilities as having the potential to undermine and weaken the international human rights framework, have constrained the political opportunities available to human responsibilities campaigns.
format Thesis
id oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/13947
institution University of Cape Town (South Africa)
language eng
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:32:26.116Z
license_str Not specified — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
publishDate 2015
publishDateRange 2015
publishDateSort 2015
publisher Department of Political Studies
publisherStr Department of Political Studies
record_format dspace
source_str UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
spelling oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/13947 Revisiting human responsibilities: prospects and challenges Smith, Liesl Ann Lynn Akokpari, John International Relations Since the drafting of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) (1948), the extent to which individuals should bear responsibilities for the fulfilment of universal human rights has been a contentiously debated subject. Despite conflicting value-based claims, the approach of international human rights law traditionally has been to recognise states as primary obligation bearers. While the UDHR focuses primarily on state obligations, deliberately unspecified duties of individuals are included under Article 29(1). The meaning of these duties has remained contested, often by relativist critics claiming that a stronger focus on responsibilities would provide a more balanced approach to human rights. The end of the Cold War brought a renewed interest in the normative potential of human rights and a parallel renewal of relativist objections to the universality of the UDHR. In this context transnational campaigns have emerged to advocate for a universal declaration of human responsibilities complementary to the UDHR. The issue has received attention from a number of initiatives, including those of United Nations bodies and agencies and of nongovernmental organisations. The most prominent of these initiatives have received firm opposition from influential Western state and non-state actors. Approaching the topic from a constructivist perspective, this dissertation draws on the social movement literature on the international political opportunity structure to argue that the activities of opponents to human responsibilities initiatives, particularly their framing of human responsibilities as having the potential to undermine and weaken the international human rights framework, have constrained the political opportunities available to human responsibilities campaigns. 2015-09-15T10:11:17Z 2015-09-15T10:11:17Z 2013 Master Thesis Masters MA http://hdl.handle.net/11427/13947 eng application/pdf Department of Political Studies Faculty of Humanities University of Cape Town
spellingShingle International Relations
Smith, Liesl Ann Lynn
Revisiting human responsibilities: prospects and challenges
thesis_degree_str Master's
title Revisiting human responsibilities: prospects and challenges
title_full Revisiting human responsibilities: prospects and challenges
title_fullStr Revisiting human responsibilities: prospects and challenges
title_full_unstemmed Revisiting human responsibilities: prospects and challenges
title_short Revisiting human responsibilities: prospects and challenges
title_sort revisiting human responsibilities prospects and challenges
topic International Relations
url http://hdl.handle.net/11427/13947
work_keys_str_mv AT smithlieslannlynn revisitinghumanresponsibilitiesprospectsandchallenges