Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

Replacing punishment: the ethics of alternatives to legal punishment

The purpose of this dissertation is to analyze the morality of putative alternatives to punishment. I will explore what makes them non-punitive, define them, and analyze whether they can be justified. The structure of the dissertation is as follows. The first chapter investigates the concept of puni...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Gallagher, Scott
Other Authors: Benatar, David
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: Department of Philosophy 2015
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613159353745408
access_status_str Open Access
author Gallagher, Scott
author2 Benatar, David
author_browse Benatar, David
Gallagher, Scott
author_facet Benatar, David
Gallagher, Scott
author_sort Gallagher, Scott
collection Thesis
description The purpose of this dissertation is to analyze the morality of putative alternatives to punishment. I will explore what makes them non-punitive, define them, and analyze whether they can be justified. The structure of the dissertation is as follows. The first chapter investigates the concept of punishment. I will defend a definition of punishment: authorized, retributive, intended harm. Then I will proceed to explain the need to justify punishment, and give an overview of how it is at least plausible to believe that no justification has yet succeeded. I will end the chapter with a brief discussion of the requirements of a criminal justice system. The second chapter is about money. I will scrutinize whether the theory of 'pure restitution' may completely replace punishment. I will argue that it cannot, and furthermore I will caution against the widespread use of mandatory monetary restitution. I will also provide a positive argument for the state's duty to provide compensation to victims of violent crime. The third chapter brings in the true heavyweights for non-punitive interventions: offender rehabilitation and offender incapacitation. After defining them, explaining why they are non-punitive, and defending justifications for them, I will conclude that they provide the most substantive opportunities for the state to shift its criminal justice burden s away from punishment. In the fourth chapter I will explore rituals: restorative justice conferences, trial and therapeutic jurisprudence, re-entry ceremonies and apologies. My argument for a minimally punitive regime will come together in the last chapter. In doing so I will explain why a state must rely on punishment to a small but crucial extent, and that punishment can be minimized drastically in comparison to today's practices. I will also address concerns regarding security and deterrence.
format Thesis
id oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/14079
institution University of Cape Town (South Africa)
language eng
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:31:43.046Z
license_str Not specified — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
publishDate 2015
publishDateRange 2015
publishDateSort 2015
publisher Department of Philosophy
publisherStr Department of Philosophy
record_format dspace
source_str UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
spelling oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/14079 Replacing punishment: the ethics of alternatives to legal punishment Gallagher, Scott Benatar, David Philosophy The purpose of this dissertation is to analyze the morality of putative alternatives to punishment. I will explore what makes them non-punitive, define them, and analyze whether they can be justified. The structure of the dissertation is as follows. The first chapter investigates the concept of punishment. I will defend a definition of punishment: authorized, retributive, intended harm. Then I will proceed to explain the need to justify punishment, and give an overview of how it is at least plausible to believe that no justification has yet succeeded. I will end the chapter with a brief discussion of the requirements of a criminal justice system. The second chapter is about money. I will scrutinize whether the theory of 'pure restitution' may completely replace punishment. I will argue that it cannot, and furthermore I will caution against the widespread use of mandatory monetary restitution. I will also provide a positive argument for the state's duty to provide compensation to victims of violent crime. The third chapter brings in the true heavyweights for non-punitive interventions: offender rehabilitation and offender incapacitation. After defining them, explaining why they are non-punitive, and defending justifications for them, I will conclude that they provide the most substantive opportunities for the state to shift its criminal justice burden s away from punishment. In the fourth chapter I will explore rituals: restorative justice conferences, trial and therapeutic jurisprudence, re-entry ceremonies and apologies. My argument for a minimally punitive regime will come together in the last chapter. In doing so I will explain why a state must rely on punishment to a small but crucial extent, and that punishment can be minimized drastically in comparison to today's practices. I will also address concerns regarding security and deterrence. 2015-09-25T07:18:58Z 2015-09-25T07:18:58Z 2013 Master Thesis Masters MA http://hdl.handle.net/11427/14079 eng application/pdf Department of Philosophy Faculty of Humanities University of Cape Town
spellingShingle Philosophy
Gallagher, Scott
Replacing punishment: the ethics of alternatives to legal punishment
thesis_degree_str Master's
title Replacing punishment: the ethics of alternatives to legal punishment
title_full Replacing punishment: the ethics of alternatives to legal punishment
title_fullStr Replacing punishment: the ethics of alternatives to legal punishment
title_full_unstemmed Replacing punishment: the ethics of alternatives to legal punishment
title_short Replacing punishment: the ethics of alternatives to legal punishment
title_sort replacing punishment the ethics of alternatives to legal punishment
topic Philosophy
url http://hdl.handle.net/11427/14079
work_keys_str_mv AT gallagherscott replacingpunishmenttheethicsofalternativestolegalpunishment