Full Text Available
Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.
A legal and comparative analysis of the independence of the Swaziland Competition Commission
Swaziland recently established a framework for enforcing competition law when it passed the Competition, Act 8 of 2007 (Swazi Competition Act). The Act provides for the establishment of the Swaziland Competition Commission (Swazi Commission), a statutory body responsible for the administration and e...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Thesis |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Department of Commercial Law
2015
|
| Subjects: | |
| Tags: |
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1867613658586021888 |
|---|---|
| access_status_str | Open Access |
| author | Gule, Nomalanga Pearl |
| author2 | Davis, Dennis |
| author_browse | Davis, Dennis Gule, Nomalanga Pearl |
| author_facet | Davis, Dennis Gule, Nomalanga Pearl |
| author_sort | Gule, Nomalanga Pearl |
| collection | Thesis |
| description | Swaziland recently established a framework for enforcing competition law when it passed the Competition, Act 8 of 2007 (Swazi Competition Act). The Act provides for the establishment of the Swaziland Competition Commission (Swazi Commission), a statutory body responsible for the administration and enforcement of the Competition Act. One of its major objectives is to promote a secure and robust economic competition and consumer protection. Following its inception in 2007, the Swazi Commission has dealt with mergers and the question on the legality and enforcement of exclusionary clauses in contracts. These clauses are most prevalent in contracts for lease on property seeking to establish large shopping malls, as we shall see later from the case of Pick 'n Pay (Pty) Ltd v The Gables (Pty) Ltd. The adoption of a comprehensive competition law framework by Swaziland is relatively a new phenomenon and like other developing countries, the Swaziland competition regime presents some institutional challenges. Some of these challenges relate to the institutional structure of the Commission and its independence. Whether the independence of the Commission can be guaranteed in view of the manner it is constructed as well as the relationship between the Swazi Commission and the courts and finally, the jurisdictional powers of the Commission in the execution of its duties and functions in terms of the Act. These challenges taken together have a potential of undermining the independence and effectiveness of the only institution that has the mandate to create and ensure free and transparent markets in the country. This treatise seeks to analyse these challenges as presented by the Swaziland competition regime. A comparative analysis between Swaziland and the South African competition regime will be carried out in order to provide somewhat practical solutions to the challenges that Swaziland is confronted with. It is also aimed at setting out proposal for the reform of the competition framework of Swaziland to incorporate the bifurcated agency model as opposed to the integrated agency model it is currently structured on. Under the bifurcated agency model the Commission investigates all competition violations and then hand over the cases to a specialised tribunal for adjudication and enforcement. In the contrary the integrated agency model entails that the Commission investigates and make the first -level adjudication. The decision of the Commission can then be reviewed or appealed by the courts. This is the model adopted by Swaziland according to the Act. |
| format | Thesis |
| id | oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/15181 |
| institution | University of Cape Town (South Africa) |
| language | eng |
| last_indexed | 2026-06-10T12:39:39.163Z |
| license_str | Not specified — see source repository |
| provenance_str_mv | Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository |
| publishDate | 2015 |
| publishDateRange | 2015 |
| publishDateSort | 2015 |
| publisher | Department of Commercial Law |
| publisherStr | Department of Commercial Law |
| record_format | dspace |
| source_str | UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository |
| spelling | oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/15181 A legal and comparative analysis of the independence of the Swaziland Competition Commission Gule, Nomalanga Pearl Davis, Dennis Commercial Law Swaziland recently established a framework for enforcing competition law when it passed the Competition, Act 8 of 2007 (Swazi Competition Act). The Act provides for the establishment of the Swaziland Competition Commission (Swazi Commission), a statutory body responsible for the administration and enforcement of the Competition Act. One of its major objectives is to promote a secure and robust economic competition and consumer protection. Following its inception in 2007, the Swazi Commission has dealt with mergers and the question on the legality and enforcement of exclusionary clauses in contracts. These clauses are most prevalent in contracts for lease on property seeking to establish large shopping malls, as we shall see later from the case of Pick 'n Pay (Pty) Ltd v The Gables (Pty) Ltd. The adoption of a comprehensive competition law framework by Swaziland is relatively a new phenomenon and like other developing countries, the Swaziland competition regime presents some institutional challenges. Some of these challenges relate to the institutional structure of the Commission and its independence. Whether the independence of the Commission can be guaranteed in view of the manner it is constructed as well as the relationship between the Swazi Commission and the courts and finally, the jurisdictional powers of the Commission in the execution of its duties and functions in terms of the Act. These challenges taken together have a potential of undermining the independence and effectiveness of the only institution that has the mandate to create and ensure free and transparent markets in the country. This treatise seeks to analyse these challenges as presented by the Swaziland competition regime. A comparative analysis between Swaziland and the South African competition regime will be carried out in order to provide somewhat practical solutions to the challenges that Swaziland is confronted with. It is also aimed at setting out proposal for the reform of the competition framework of Swaziland to incorporate the bifurcated agency model as opposed to the integrated agency model it is currently structured on. Under the bifurcated agency model the Commission investigates all competition violations and then hand over the cases to a specialised tribunal for adjudication and enforcement. In the contrary the integrated agency model entails that the Commission investigates and make the first -level adjudication. The decision of the Commission can then be reviewed or appealed by the courts. This is the model adopted by Swaziland according to the Act. 2015-11-21T09:37:51Z 2015-11-21T09:37:51Z 2015 Master Thesis Masters LLM http://hdl.handle.net/11427/15181 eng application/pdf Department of Commercial Law Faculty of Law University of Cape Town |
| spellingShingle | Commercial Law Gule, Nomalanga Pearl A legal and comparative analysis of the independence of the Swaziland Competition Commission |
| thesis_degree_str | Master's |
| title | A legal and comparative analysis of the independence of the Swaziland Competition Commission |
| title_full | A legal and comparative analysis of the independence of the Swaziland Competition Commission |
| title_fullStr | A legal and comparative analysis of the independence of the Swaziland Competition Commission |
| title_full_unstemmed | A legal and comparative analysis of the independence of the Swaziland Competition Commission |
| title_short | A legal and comparative analysis of the independence of the Swaziland Competition Commission |
| title_sort | legal and comparative analysis of the independence of the swaziland competition commission |
| topic | Commercial Law |
| url | http://hdl.handle.net/11427/15181 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT gulenomalangapearl alegalandcomparativeanalysisoftheindependenceoftheswazilandcompetitioncommission AT gulenomalangapearl legalandcomparativeanalysisoftheindependenceoftheswazilandcompetitioncommission |