Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

A comparison of the returns of 'Regulation 28' compliant and non-compliant funds in South Africa

The shift from defined benefit to defined contribution plans has exposed pensioners to a number of new risks which the South African government has been encouraged to mitigate through the aggressive implementation of retirement fund regulations. This study specifically focuses on the effect of asset...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Noland, Stuart
Other Authors: West, Darron
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: Department of Finance and Tax 2015
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613159363182592
access_status_str Open Access
author Noland, Stuart
author2 West, Darron
author_browse Noland, Stuart
West, Darron
author_facet West, Darron
Noland, Stuart
author_sort Noland, Stuart
collection Thesis
description The shift from defined benefit to defined contribution plans has exposed pensioners to a number of new risks which the South African government has been encouraged to mitigate through the aggressive implementation of retirement fund regulations. This study specifically focuses on the effect of asset allocation restrictions. The effect of these regulations is critically evaluated by comparing the long-term effects of both excess returns and risk-weighted returns of Regulation 28 compliant funds, to fully discretional non-compliant portfolios. With a population of 27 compliant funds and 21 non-compliant funds, it was found that while mean excess long-term return of non-compliant funds consistently outperforms compliant funds, there is no significant statistical difference between the two data sets. Additionally, while regulations successfully reduce the variation of excess returns of the compliant funds relative to the noncompliant funds, and the mean risk-weighted performance of compliant funds consistently outperformed non-compliant funds during the latter parts of the scoped period, no significant statistical difference was identified between compliant and non-compliant investment funds.
format Thesis
id oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/15710
institution University of Cape Town (South Africa)
language eng
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:31:43.046Z
license_str Not specified — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
publishDate 2015
publishDateRange 2015
publishDateSort 2015
publisher Department of Finance and Tax
publisherStr Department of Finance and Tax
record_format dspace
source_str UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
spelling oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/15710 A comparison of the returns of 'Regulation 28' compliant and non-compliant funds in South Africa Noland, Stuart West, Darron Financial Management The shift from defined benefit to defined contribution plans has exposed pensioners to a number of new risks which the South African government has been encouraged to mitigate through the aggressive implementation of retirement fund regulations. This study specifically focuses on the effect of asset allocation restrictions. The effect of these regulations is critically evaluated by comparing the long-term effects of both excess returns and risk-weighted returns of Regulation 28 compliant funds, to fully discretional non-compliant portfolios. With a population of 27 compliant funds and 21 non-compliant funds, it was found that while mean excess long-term return of non-compliant funds consistently outperforms compliant funds, there is no significant statistical difference between the two data sets. Additionally, while regulations successfully reduce the variation of excess returns of the compliant funds relative to the noncompliant funds, and the mean risk-weighted performance of compliant funds consistently outperformed non-compliant funds during the latter parts of the scoped period, no significant statistical difference was identified between compliant and non-compliant investment funds. 2015-12-08T11:51:22Z 2015-12-08T11:51:22Z 2015 Master Thesis Masters MCom http://hdl.handle.net/11427/15710 eng application/pdf Department of Finance and Tax Faculty of Commerce University of Cape Town
spellingShingle Financial Management
Noland, Stuart
A comparison of the returns of 'Regulation 28' compliant and non-compliant funds in South Africa
thesis_degree_str Master's
title A comparison of the returns of 'Regulation 28' compliant and non-compliant funds in South Africa
title_full A comparison of the returns of 'Regulation 28' compliant and non-compliant funds in South Africa
title_fullStr A comparison of the returns of 'Regulation 28' compliant and non-compliant funds in South Africa
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of the returns of 'Regulation 28' compliant and non-compliant funds in South Africa
title_short A comparison of the returns of 'Regulation 28' compliant and non-compliant funds in South Africa
title_sort comparison of the returns of regulation 28 compliant and non compliant funds in south africa
topic Financial Management
url http://hdl.handle.net/11427/15710
work_keys_str_mv AT nolandstuart acomparisonofthereturnsofregulation28compliantandnoncompliantfundsinsouthafrica
AT nolandstuart comparisonofthereturnsofregulation28compliantandnoncompliantfundsinsouthafrica