Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

Comparing the efficiency of beclomethasone, fluticasone and mometasone nasal sprays in a Samter's population

Statement of problem: Topical corticosteroids nasal sprays remain first line of treatment for patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (with or without nasal polyps). The main aim of treatment is to improve nasal symptoms by reducing or eliminating the nasal polyps and preventing polyp recurrence post-o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Monteiro, Pedro Vilas Boas
Other Authors: Lubbe, Darlene
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: Division of Otorhinolaryngology 2015
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613772128976896
access_status_str Open Access
author Monteiro, Pedro Vilas Boas
author2 Lubbe, Darlene
author_browse Lubbe, Darlene
Monteiro, Pedro Vilas Boas
author_facet Lubbe, Darlene
Monteiro, Pedro Vilas Boas
author_sort Monteiro, Pedro Vilas Boas
collection Thesis
description Statement of problem: Topical corticosteroids nasal sprays remain first line of treatment for patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (with or without nasal polyps). The main aim of treatment is to improve nasal symptoms by reducing or eliminating the nasal polyps and preventing polyp recurrence post-operatively. Our aims were to determine if the type of corticosteroid nasal spray used post operatively influences polyp recurrence rate and if there were any subsequent economic implications as we only have beclomethasone available for prescription in our state hospital. Methods: Retrospective case note review of all Samter's patients who underwent fronto-spheno-ethmoidectomy by a single surgeon (2000 – 2014). Results: 58 patients were included in our study, divided into 3 study groups. When compared to patients using beclomethasone; patients using fluticasone had an 80% reduced risk of polyp recurrence and patients using mometasone a 90% reduced risk. This rose to 88% and 96% respectively when adjusted for age. Conclusion: Fluticasone and mometasone are both statistically significantly more effective at reducing polyp recurrence than beclomethasone in our population group. Mometasone appeared more effective than fluticasone, but this difference was not statistically significant.
format Thesis
id oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/15753
institution University of Cape Town (South Africa)
language eng
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:41:27.446Z
license_str Not specified — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
publishDate 2015
publishDateRange 2015
publishDateSort 2015
publisher Division of Otorhinolaryngology
publisherStr Division of Otorhinolaryngology
record_format dspace
source_str UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
spelling oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/15753 Comparing the efficiency of beclomethasone, fluticasone and mometasone nasal sprays in a Samter's population Monteiro, Pedro Vilas Boas Lubbe, Darlene Otorhinolaryngology Statement of problem: Topical corticosteroids nasal sprays remain first line of treatment for patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (with or without nasal polyps). The main aim of treatment is to improve nasal symptoms by reducing or eliminating the nasal polyps and preventing polyp recurrence post-operatively. Our aims were to determine if the type of corticosteroid nasal spray used post operatively influences polyp recurrence rate and if there were any subsequent economic implications as we only have beclomethasone available for prescription in our state hospital. Methods: Retrospective case note review of all Samter's patients who underwent fronto-spheno-ethmoidectomy by a single surgeon (2000 – 2014). Results: 58 patients were included in our study, divided into 3 study groups. When compared to patients using beclomethasone; patients using fluticasone had an 80% reduced risk of polyp recurrence and patients using mometasone a 90% reduced risk. This rose to 88% and 96% respectively when adjusted for age. Conclusion: Fluticasone and mometasone are both statistically significantly more effective at reducing polyp recurrence than beclomethasone in our population group. Mometasone appeared more effective than fluticasone, but this difference was not statistically significant. 2015-12-10T09:30:15Z 2015-12-10T09:30:15Z 2015 Master Thesis Masters MMed http://hdl.handle.net/11427/15753 eng application/pdf Division of Otorhinolaryngology Faculty of Health Sciences University of Cape Town
spellingShingle Otorhinolaryngology
Monteiro, Pedro Vilas Boas
Comparing the efficiency of beclomethasone, fluticasone and mometasone nasal sprays in a Samter's population
thesis_degree_str Master's
title Comparing the efficiency of beclomethasone, fluticasone and mometasone nasal sprays in a Samter's population
title_full Comparing the efficiency of beclomethasone, fluticasone and mometasone nasal sprays in a Samter's population
title_fullStr Comparing the efficiency of beclomethasone, fluticasone and mometasone nasal sprays in a Samter's population
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the efficiency of beclomethasone, fluticasone and mometasone nasal sprays in a Samter's population
title_short Comparing the efficiency of beclomethasone, fluticasone and mometasone nasal sprays in a Samter's population
title_sort comparing the efficiency of beclomethasone fluticasone and mometasone nasal sprays in a samter s population
topic Otorhinolaryngology
url http://hdl.handle.net/11427/15753
work_keys_str_mv AT monteiropedrovilasboas comparingtheefficiencyofbeclomethasonefluticasoneandmometasonenasalspraysinasamterspopulation