Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

The judicial discretion to allow unlawful government procurement awards to stand: justification and implications for the principle of legality and the rule of law

Includes bibliographical references

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jones, Michael
Other Authors: Corder, Hugh
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: Department of Public Law 2016
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613358168997888
access_status_str Open Access
author Jones, Michael
author2 Corder, Hugh
author_browse Corder, Hugh
Jones, Michael
author_facet Corder, Hugh
Jones, Michael
author_sort Jones, Michael
collection Thesis
description Includes bibliographical references
format Thesis
id oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/16661
institution University of Cape Town (South Africa)
language eng
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:34:52.663Z
license_str Not specified — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
publishDate 2016
publishDateRange 2016
publishDateSort 2016
publisher Department of Public Law
publisherStr Department of Public Law
record_format dspace
source_str UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
spelling oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/16661 The judicial discretion to allow unlawful government procurement awards to stand: justification and implications for the principle of legality and the rule of law Jones, Michael Corder, Hugh Naudé, Tjakie Public Law government procurement awards public accountability Rule of Law Includes bibliographical references The development of subjecting government procurement awards to judicial review is a relatively recent development in South African law. It accords with a similar development in the United States, as well as South Africa's own constitutional requirements of transparency and public accountability. Given the often lucrative nature of public contracts, challenges to the lawfulness of government procurement awards have become a regular occurrence in South Africa. However, the setting aside of such an award does not automatically follow upon a finding of unlawfulness. For a number of reasons, a court may decline to set aside an unlawful government procurement award. This raises a number of interesting questions, particularly with regard to how such a decision may be reconciled with, and the implications this may have for, the principle of legality and the Rule of Law. This dissertation will address these issues, arguing that, ultimately, the concerns are resolved by appreciating the nature of the principle of legality, and the Rule of Law's place as a value in society. 2016-02-01T10:16:47Z 2016-02-01T10:16:47Z 2015 Master Thesis Masters LLM http://hdl.handle.net/11427/16661 eng application/pdf Department of Public Law Faculty of Law University of Cape Town
spellingShingle Public Law
government procurement awards
public accountability
Rule of Law
Jones, Michael
The judicial discretion to allow unlawful government procurement awards to stand: justification and implications for the principle of legality and the rule of law
thesis_degree_str Master's
title The judicial discretion to allow unlawful government procurement awards to stand: justification and implications for the principle of legality and the rule of law
title_full The judicial discretion to allow unlawful government procurement awards to stand: justification and implications for the principle of legality and the rule of law
title_fullStr The judicial discretion to allow unlawful government procurement awards to stand: justification and implications for the principle of legality and the rule of law
title_full_unstemmed The judicial discretion to allow unlawful government procurement awards to stand: justification and implications for the principle of legality and the rule of law
title_short The judicial discretion to allow unlawful government procurement awards to stand: justification and implications for the principle of legality and the rule of law
title_sort judicial discretion to allow unlawful government procurement awards to stand justification and implications for the principle of legality and the rule of law
topic Public Law
government procurement awards
public accountability
Rule of Law
url http://hdl.handle.net/11427/16661
work_keys_str_mv AT jonesmichael thejudicialdiscretiontoallowunlawfulgovernmentprocurementawardstostandjustificationandimplicationsfortheprincipleoflegalityandtheruleoflaw
AT jonesmichael judicialdiscretiontoallowunlawfulgovernmentprocurementawardstostandjustificationandimplicationsfortheprincipleoflegalityandtheruleoflaw