Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

Differences in the comprehensibility of testimony : a comparative study of magistrate's credibility judgements, witnesses' ethnicity and court role

BIbliography: pages 203-215.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hansson, Desirée S
Other Authors: Foster, Don
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: Department of Psychology 2016
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867614192992780288
access_status_str Open Access
author Hansson, Desirée S
author2 Foster, Don
author_browse Foster, Don
Hansson, Desirée S
author_facet Foster, Don
Hansson, Desirée S
author_sort Hansson, Desirée S
collection Thesis
description BIbliography: pages 203-215.
format Thesis
id oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/17018
institution University of Cape Town (South Africa)
language eng
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:48:08.813Z
license_str Not specified — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
publishDate 2016
publishDateRange 2016
publishDateSort 2016
publisher Department of Psychology
publisherStr Department of Psychology
record_format dspace
source_str UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
spelling oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/17018 Differences in the comprehensibility of testimony : a comparative study of magistrate's credibility judgements, witnesses' ethnicity and court role Hansson, Desirée S Foster, Don Van Zyl Smit, Dirk Psychology BIbliography: pages 203-215. Only limited research has been undertaken regarding the effects of extralegal variables on the verdicts of lower courts. Bennett and Feldman (1981) have demonstrated that the well-formedness of the semantic structure of testimony determines its credibility. It has been shown that the comprehensibility of narrative discourse (testimony) is a reliable indicator of its well-formedness (Thorndyke, 1977). This study aims to explore the relationships between comprehensibility (well-formedness) as a dependent variable, and magistrates' credibility judgements, the ethnicity of witnesses and their court roles as independent variables. Simple three way Anovas constituted the bulk of the statistical analyses. 2016-02-15T07:12:26Z 2016-02-15T07:12:26Z 1985 Master Thesis Masters MSocSc http://hdl.handle.net/11427/17018 eng application/pdf Department of Psychology Faculty of Humanities University of Cape Town
spellingShingle Psychology
Hansson, Desirée S
Differences in the comprehensibility of testimony : a comparative study of magistrate's credibility judgements, witnesses' ethnicity and court role
thesis_degree_str Master's
title Differences in the comprehensibility of testimony : a comparative study of magistrate's credibility judgements, witnesses' ethnicity and court role
title_full Differences in the comprehensibility of testimony : a comparative study of magistrate's credibility judgements, witnesses' ethnicity and court role
title_fullStr Differences in the comprehensibility of testimony : a comparative study of magistrate's credibility judgements, witnesses' ethnicity and court role
title_full_unstemmed Differences in the comprehensibility of testimony : a comparative study of magistrate's credibility judgements, witnesses' ethnicity and court role
title_short Differences in the comprehensibility of testimony : a comparative study of magistrate's credibility judgements, witnesses' ethnicity and court role
title_sort differences in the comprehensibility of testimony a comparative study of magistrate s credibility judgements witnesses ethnicity and court role
topic Psychology
url http://hdl.handle.net/11427/17018
work_keys_str_mv AT hanssondesirees differencesinthecomprehensibilityoftestimonyacomparativestudyofmagistratescredibilityjudgementswitnessesethnicityandcourtrole