Full Text Available
Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.
Solution methods for dynamic and non-linear finite element analysis
The computer analysis of structures and solids using finite element methods has now taken on very significant proportions. In many cases the safety of a structure may be significantly increased and its cost reduced if an appropriate finite element analysis can be and is performed. In the developmen...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Department of Civil Engineering
2016
|
| Subjects: | |
| Tags: |
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1867613201432051712 |
|---|---|
| access_status_str | Open Access |
| author | Bathe, Klaus-Jürgen |
| author_browse | Bathe, Klaus-Jürgen |
| author_facet | Bathe, Klaus-Jürgen |
| author_sort | Bathe, Klaus-Jürgen |
| collection | Thesis |
| description | The computer analysis of structures and solids using finite element methods has now taken on very significant proportions. In many cases the safety of a structure may be significantly increased and its cost reduced if an appropriate finite element analysis can be and is performed. In the development and use of finite element methods, we recognize that, considering static linear analysis, already towards the end of the nineteen sixties the methods were highly developed - thus it had taken only about one decade from the inception to the extensive practical use of finite element methods. Although difficulties were still encountered in the linear static analysis of some structures, e.g. complex shells, most of the structures could already be analysed in a routine manner. This situation in engineering analysis was, however, quite different when dynamic or nonlinear conditions had to be considered. Whereas the finite element methods could be developed relatively quickly for linear static analysis, methods for practical dynamic and nonlinear analyses are much more difficult to establish. Although much emphasis has been placed on research in nonlinear analysis, the progress in the development of valuable techniques has been quite slow. The practical objectives in the development of finite element methods for dynamic and nonlinear analysis are, in essence, that we want to be able to analyze increasingly more complex structures which are subjected to loads that vary rapidly - causing dynamic response - and loads of high intensity - causing the structure to respond beyond its linear range. In nonlinear conditions, geometric and/or material nonlinearities may have to be taken into consideration. These analysis conditions are encountered already in many industries (e.g. design of nuclear power plants) and, with the current needs towards usage of new materials and more efficient structures, nonlinear analysis will undoubtedly be required to an increasing extent. Considering research in finite element analysis procedures, emphasis must be placed on the development of reliable, general and cost-effective techniques. The reliability of the analysis techniques is of utmost concern in order that the analyst can employ the methods with confidence. The results of an analysis can only be interpreted with confidence if reliable methods have been employed. The generality and cost-effectiveness of the methods are important in order to produce analysis tools that, in a design office, are applicable to a relatively large number of problems. With the above aims in mind, the development of finite element procedures for dynamic and nonlinear analysis becomes a very formidable task. Not only is it necessary to propose -guided by knowledge and intuition - improved analysis techniques and then to implement and test these methods, but it is of major importance and difficulty to "fully" verify and qualify these theories and their computer program implementations. Whereas the verification and qualification of a finite element method is usually quite straight-forward in linear static analysis, this process may represent the major task in the development of a method for nonlinear analysis. During the last decade I have endeavored to advance the state-of-the-art of general and reliable finite element analysis procedures for dynamic and nonlinear response calculations. |
| format | Thesis |
| id | oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/18365 |
| institution | University of Cape Town (South Africa) |
| language | eng |
| last_indexed | 2026-06-10T12:32:21.936Z |
| license_str | Not specified — see source repository |
| provenance_str_mv | Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository |
| publishDate | 2016 |
| publishDateRange | 2016 |
| publishDateSort | 2016 |
| publisher | Department of Civil Engineering |
| publisherStr | Department of Civil Engineering |
| record_format | dspace |
| source_str | UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository |
| spelling | oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/18365 Solution methods for dynamic and non-linear finite element analysis Bathe, Klaus-Jürgen Civil Engineering The computer analysis of structures and solids using finite element methods has now taken on very significant proportions. In many cases the safety of a structure may be significantly increased and its cost reduced if an appropriate finite element analysis can be and is performed. In the development and use of finite element methods, we recognize that, considering static linear analysis, already towards the end of the nineteen sixties the methods were highly developed - thus it had taken only about one decade from the inception to the extensive practical use of finite element methods. Although difficulties were still encountered in the linear static analysis of some structures, e.g. complex shells, most of the structures could already be analysed in a routine manner. This situation in engineering analysis was, however, quite different when dynamic or nonlinear conditions had to be considered. Whereas the finite element methods could be developed relatively quickly for linear static analysis, methods for practical dynamic and nonlinear analyses are much more difficult to establish. Although much emphasis has been placed on research in nonlinear analysis, the progress in the development of valuable techniques has been quite slow. The practical objectives in the development of finite element methods for dynamic and nonlinear analysis are, in essence, that we want to be able to analyze increasingly more complex structures which are subjected to loads that vary rapidly - causing dynamic response - and loads of high intensity - causing the structure to respond beyond its linear range. In nonlinear conditions, geometric and/or material nonlinearities may have to be taken into consideration. These analysis conditions are encountered already in many industries (e.g. design of nuclear power plants) and, with the current needs towards usage of new materials and more efficient structures, nonlinear analysis will undoubtedly be required to an increasing extent. Considering research in finite element analysis procedures, emphasis must be placed on the development of reliable, general and cost-effective techniques. The reliability of the analysis techniques is of utmost concern in order that the analyst can employ the methods with confidence. The results of an analysis can only be interpreted with confidence if reliable methods have been employed. The generality and cost-effectiveness of the methods are important in order to produce analysis tools that, in a design office, are applicable to a relatively large number of problems. With the above aims in mind, the development of finite element procedures for dynamic and nonlinear analysis becomes a very formidable task. Not only is it necessary to propose -guided by knowledge and intuition - improved analysis techniques and then to implement and test these methods, but it is of major importance and difficulty to "fully" verify and qualify these theories and their computer program implementations. Whereas the verification and qualification of a finite element method is usually quite straight-forward in linear static analysis, this process may represent the major task in the development of a method for nonlinear analysis. During the last decade I have endeavored to advance the state-of-the-art of general and reliable finite element analysis procedures for dynamic and nonlinear response calculations. 2016-03-30T07:07:48Z 2016-03-30T07:07:48Z 1981 Doctoral Thesis Doctoral DSc http://hdl.handle.net/11427/18365 eng application/pdf Department of Civil Engineering Faculty of Engineering and the Built Environment University of Cape Town |
| spellingShingle | Civil Engineering Bathe, Klaus-Jürgen Solution methods for dynamic and non-linear finite element analysis |
| thesis_degree_str | Doctoral |
| title | Solution methods for dynamic and non-linear finite element analysis |
| title_full | Solution methods for dynamic and non-linear finite element analysis |
| title_fullStr | Solution methods for dynamic and non-linear finite element analysis |
| title_full_unstemmed | Solution methods for dynamic and non-linear finite element analysis |
| title_short | Solution methods for dynamic and non-linear finite element analysis |
| title_sort | solution methods for dynamic and non linear finite element analysis |
| topic | Civil Engineering |
| url | http://hdl.handle.net/11427/18365 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT batheklausjurgen solutionmethodsfordynamicandnonlinearfiniteelementanalysis |