Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

Populêre vs. literêre grensverhale : twee beelde van die Angolese oorlog (1966-1989)

Bibliography: pages 198-207.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Van Huyssteen, Konstant
Other Authors: Van der Merwe, Chris N
Format: Thesis
Language:Afrikaans
Published: Afrikaans and Netherlandic Studies 2016
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613213429858304
access_status_str Open Access
author Van Huyssteen, Konstant
author2 Van der Merwe, Chris N
author_browse Van Huyssteen, Konstant
Van der Merwe, Chris N
author_facet Van der Merwe, Chris N
Van Huyssteen, Konstant
author_sort Van Huyssteen, Konstant
collection Thesis
description Bibliography: pages 198-207.
format Thesis
id oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/19512
institution University of Cape Town (South Africa)
language afr
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:32:34.479Z
license_str Not specified — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
publishDate 2016
publishDateRange 2016
publishDateSort 2016
publisher Afrikaans and Netherlandic Studies
publisherStr Afrikaans and Netherlandic Studies
record_format dspace
source_str UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
spelling oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/19512 Populêre vs. literêre grensverhale : twee beelde van die Angolese oorlog (1966-1989) Van Huyssteen, Konstant Van der Merwe, Chris N Wolfswinkel, Rolf M Afrikaans fiction - History and criticism Afrikaans literature - History and criticism Bibliography: pages 198-207. In this dissertation, a study is made of two bodies of fiction documenting the South African soldier in Angola. The fiction was limited to Afrikaans short stories, as this genre is believed to best reflect the fragmentary, explosive experience of combat. This demarcation also served as a way of limiting the body of fiction for the study. A cut-off year of 1990 was taken. The rationale for this is that the late seventies and eighties was the golden age for the publication of border fiction, and that Southwest AfricaNamibia gained independence in 1990 with a SWAPO (South West Africa People's Organisation) government, thus largely defeating the purposes of South African military involvement in Namibia and Angola. The collections of short stories that were analyzed in this study, were divided into two categories. The stories published in popular family magazines such as Die Huisgenoot were considered to be popular fiction. These stories are overtly accepting of South Africa's involvement in Namibia and Angola, and are highly propagandistic. The collections Ses Wenverhale (1988) by Maretha Maartens and others, and Verby die wit brug (1978) by Johan Coetzee, were analyzed as examples of this category. In the category of literary short stories, Wie de hel het jou vertel? (1988) by Gawie Kellerman and 'n Wereld sonder grense (1984) by Alexander Strachan were analyzed. It is important to note that the texts were selected thematically i.e. the criterium was that they had to have the South African soldier in South West AfricaAngola as main theme. Analyses of the texts are based on the thesis formulated by H P van Coller in his article "Afrikaanse literatuur oor die gewapende konflik in Suider-Afrika sedert 1963 - 'n voorlopige verslag". In this report, Van Coller mentions that studies comparing the literary border fiction with the popular border fiction, have been left behind. The study aims at examining this unexplored territory and looks extensively at how these two bodies of fiction differ. It was found that two radically different images of the border war emerge from the two bodies of fiction: the popular fiction is uncritical, war is presented more as an exciting game in the popular fiction, whereas it is presented as deadly, yet addictive, in the literary fiction. The ideological backgrounds from which the stories are written, are fundamentally opposed: the popular fiction often sees the war as a continuation of the white man's struggle for survival on a violent continent, and God is assumed to be on the South African side. The literary fiction documents a loss of God and criticises the government, censorship and apartheid. The literary fiction also fulfills a function of reporting - that which has not been said in the media due to censorship by government. The scope of the popular fiction is much narrower than the literary fiction, ignoring issues such as homosexuality in the army, torture and atrocities. Finally, the conclusions differ, with a sentimental "all will be well" in the popular fiction, as opposed to the fundamental pessimism in the literary fiction. 2016-05-09T08:57:32Z 2016-05-09T08:57:32Z 1998 Master Thesis Masters MA http://hdl.handle.net/11427/19512 afr application/pdf Afrikaans and Netherlandic Studies Faculty of Humanities University of Cape Town
spellingShingle Afrikaans fiction - History and criticism
Afrikaans literature - History and criticism
Van Huyssteen, Konstant
Populêre vs. literêre grensverhale : twee beelde van die Angolese oorlog (1966-1989)
thesis_degree_str Master's
title Populêre vs. literêre grensverhale : twee beelde van die Angolese oorlog (1966-1989)
title_full Populêre vs. literêre grensverhale : twee beelde van die Angolese oorlog (1966-1989)
title_fullStr Populêre vs. literêre grensverhale : twee beelde van die Angolese oorlog (1966-1989)
title_full_unstemmed Populêre vs. literêre grensverhale : twee beelde van die Angolese oorlog (1966-1989)
title_short Populêre vs. literêre grensverhale : twee beelde van die Angolese oorlog (1966-1989)
title_sort populere vs literere grensverhale twee beelde van die angolese oorlog 1966 1989
topic Afrikaans fiction - History and criticism
Afrikaans literature - History and criticism
url http://hdl.handle.net/11427/19512
work_keys_str_mv AT vanhuyssteenkonstant populerevslitereregrensverhaletweebeeldevandieangoleseoorlog19661989