Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

To what extent do South Africa and Scotland comparatively respect, protect and fulfill children's rights in the context of youth justice and in light of their international and regional obligations?

Juvenile justice is a core facet of international child law aimed at protecting children who come into conflict with the law. The international and regional juvenile justice frameworks outline the standards expected of States party to the international instruments. Both South Africa and Scotland are...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Thomson, Gemma
Other Authors: Chirwa, Danwood Mzikenge
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: Department of Public Law 2016
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867614180080615424
access_status_str Open Access
author Thomson, Gemma
author2 Chirwa, Danwood Mzikenge
author_browse Chirwa, Danwood Mzikenge
Thomson, Gemma
author_facet Chirwa, Danwood Mzikenge
Thomson, Gemma
author_sort Thomson, Gemma
collection Thesis
description Juvenile justice is a core facet of international child law aimed at protecting children who come into conflict with the law. The international and regional juvenile justice frameworks outline the standards expected of States party to the international instruments. Both South Africa and Scotland are obligated to adhere to these rules and principles by way of creation and implementation of domestic laws in furtherance of a child-centered approach to justice. This dissertation analyses the effectiveness of both national systems and assesses the extent to which they respect, protect and fulfill children's rights in the context of international child law. This study also aims to highlight areas in which South Africa and Scotland fail to meet the prescribed standards and proposes various recommendations in order to do so more effectively.
format Thesis
id oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/20808
institution University of Cape Town (South Africa)
language eng
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:47:56.499Z
license_str Not specified — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
publishDate 2016
publishDateRange 2016
publishDateSort 2016
publisher Department of Public Law
publisherStr Department of Public Law
record_format dspace
source_str UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
spelling oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/20808 To what extent do South Africa and Scotland comparatively respect, protect and fulfill children's rights in the context of youth justice and in light of their international and regional obligations? Thomson, Gemma Chirwa, Danwood Mzikenge Human Rights Law Juvenile justice is a core facet of international child law aimed at protecting children who come into conflict with the law. The international and regional juvenile justice frameworks outline the standards expected of States party to the international instruments. Both South Africa and Scotland are obligated to adhere to these rules and principles by way of creation and implementation of domestic laws in furtherance of a child-centered approach to justice. This dissertation analyses the effectiveness of both national systems and assesses the extent to which they respect, protect and fulfill children's rights in the context of international child law. This study also aims to highlight areas in which South Africa and Scotland fail to meet the prescribed standards and proposes various recommendations in order to do so more effectively. 2016-07-26T12:22:17Z 2016-07-26T12:22:17Z 2016 Master Thesis Masters LLM http://hdl.handle.net/11427/20808 eng application/pdf Department of Public Law Faculty of Law University of Cape Town
spellingShingle Human Rights Law
Thomson, Gemma
To what extent do South Africa and Scotland comparatively respect, protect and fulfill children's rights in the context of youth justice and in light of their international and regional obligations?
thesis_degree_str Master's
title To what extent do South Africa and Scotland comparatively respect, protect and fulfill children's rights in the context of youth justice and in light of their international and regional obligations?
title_full To what extent do South Africa and Scotland comparatively respect, protect and fulfill children's rights in the context of youth justice and in light of their international and regional obligations?
title_fullStr To what extent do South Africa and Scotland comparatively respect, protect and fulfill children's rights in the context of youth justice and in light of their international and regional obligations?
title_full_unstemmed To what extent do South Africa and Scotland comparatively respect, protect and fulfill children's rights in the context of youth justice and in light of their international and regional obligations?
title_short To what extent do South Africa and Scotland comparatively respect, protect and fulfill children's rights in the context of youth justice and in light of their international and regional obligations?
title_sort to what extent do south africa and scotland comparatively respect protect and fulfill children s rights in the context of youth justice and in light of their international and regional obligations
topic Human Rights Law
url http://hdl.handle.net/11427/20808
work_keys_str_mv AT thomsongemma towhatextentdosouthafricaandscotlandcomparativelyrespectprotectandfulfillchildrensrightsinthecontextofyouthjusticeandinlightoftheirinternationalandregionalobligations