Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

Anaesthesia Preoperative Clinic (APOC) Audit

Background: Preoperative assessment clinics have been employed in many institutions to manage perioperative risks1. These clinics provide an opportunity to stratify patients on the basis of risk prior to surgery, to make timely multidisciplinary referrals where appropriate, and to prescribe medical...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Dass, Deshandra
Other Authors: Nejthardt, Marcin B
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: Department of Anaesthesia 2017
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867614141985849344
access_status_str Open Access
author Dass, Deshandra
author2 Nejthardt, Marcin B
author_browse Dass, Deshandra
Nejthardt, Marcin B
author_facet Nejthardt, Marcin B
Dass, Deshandra
author_sort Dass, Deshandra
collection Thesis
description Background: Preoperative assessment clinics have been employed in many institutions to manage perioperative risks1. These clinics provide an opportunity to stratify patients on the basis of risk prior to surgery, to make timely multidisciplinary referrals where appropriate, and to prescribe medical therapies according to the current best evidence resulting, in fewer last-minute cancellations for medical reasons2 and a shorter inpatient pre-operative stay3. The Anaesthetic Pre-Operative Clinic (APOC-GSH) was introduced to Groote Schuur Hospital in 2009 with the aim of assessing and optimising high risk patients undergoing intermediate or high risk surgery. The vision of the clinic is to decrease perioperative morbidity and mortality, rationally and costconsciously investigate patients, as well as to reduce theatre cancellations of inappropriately assessed and managed patients. The clinic, together with relevant role players, attempts to risk stratify patients in making an informed decision whether the intended perioperative risks are acceptable. Patients referred to the clinic fall into two categories. Either the surgical date has been scheduled and patients are referred to APOC-GSH for optimization, or the referral is for assessment of suitability to undergo an anaesthetic and thus the treatment modality hinges on the fitness for surgery. Objective The intention of the audit is to create a database of the patients seen at APOC-GSH during 2014. Primary objectives are: 1 Referral pattern: - What proportion of patients are referred for improvement of medical condition? - What proportion of patients are referred for an assessment of operability? 2 What interventions were recommended? - What was the influence of interventions on operability and timing of surgery? - Does the clinic improve theatre efficiency by reducing cancellations of patients who required further interdisciplinary discussion and investigations? Methods: Data collection will be based on the review of APOC-GSH clerking notes and hospital patient records. The following information will be collected and entered into an Excel spread sheet: the surgical discipline referring the patient, the proposed surgery, patient co-morbidities, the lead-time from the first APOC-GSH assessment to surgery, number of visits to APOC-GSH by each patient, the investigations and additional interventions instituted at APOC-GSH. We shall also calculate the proportion of patients that would have likely been cancelled had they not attended APOC-GSH but rather been assessed by an anaesthetist the day before surgery. The record of the APOC-GSH consultation will be documented on a clerking sheet established for use within the clinic (Addendum A). The original form will be included in the patients' file and a duplicate will be stored within the access controlled Department Of Anaesthesia offices at GSH. The duplicate records will be used to obtain the information for the audit. Ethical approval will be sought from the UCT Human Research Ethics Committee for the establishment of the database and retrospective review of the APOC-GSH records on the understanding that patient records would be kept confidential and that the data obtained would be stored in a password protected spreadsheet. Access to the spreadsheet will be limited to the investigators involved and no identifiable patient details will be included. Patients will be counselled as to the nature of the study and will be expected to submit signed consent forms allowing their records to be reviewed. Patients will be informed that they will not be disadvantaged by refusal to sign the consent form and that the appropriate standard of care will still be applied. No remuneration will be provided for partaking either. Consent will be documented on the consent form specifically designed for use in the APOC-GSH. (Addendum B) Statistical analysis will be performed using an Excel® spreadsheet. Means, medians, rates and percentages will be used to describe the discrete categorical data. Output and future work The audit will provide an objective assessment of the population profile referred to APOC-GSH. It may guide future implementation of APOC-GSH protocol changes and assist with resource allocation depending on the surgical discipline requirements. Patient and surgeon satisfaction ratings may be embarked at a later stage juxtaposed against an adequate assessment in a cost and time conscious manner.
format Thesis
id oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/22755
institution University of Cape Town (South Africa)
language eng
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:47:20.169Z
license_str Not specified — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
publishDate 2017
publishDateRange 2017
publishDateSort 2017
publisher Department of Anaesthesia
publisherStr Department of Anaesthesia
record_format dspace
source_str UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
spelling oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/22755 Anaesthesia Preoperative Clinic (APOC) Audit Dass, Deshandra Nejthardt, Marcin B Roodt, Francois Anaesthesiology Background: Preoperative assessment clinics have been employed in many institutions to manage perioperative risks1. These clinics provide an opportunity to stratify patients on the basis of risk prior to surgery, to make timely multidisciplinary referrals where appropriate, and to prescribe medical therapies according to the current best evidence resulting, in fewer last-minute cancellations for medical reasons2 and a shorter inpatient pre-operative stay3. The Anaesthetic Pre-Operative Clinic (APOC-GSH) was introduced to Groote Schuur Hospital in 2009 with the aim of assessing and optimising high risk patients undergoing intermediate or high risk surgery. The vision of the clinic is to decrease perioperative morbidity and mortality, rationally and costconsciously investigate patients, as well as to reduce theatre cancellations of inappropriately assessed and managed patients. The clinic, together with relevant role players, attempts to risk stratify patients in making an informed decision whether the intended perioperative risks are acceptable. Patients referred to the clinic fall into two categories. Either the surgical date has been scheduled and patients are referred to APOC-GSH for optimization, or the referral is for assessment of suitability to undergo an anaesthetic and thus the treatment modality hinges on the fitness for surgery. Objective The intention of the audit is to create a database of the patients seen at APOC-GSH during 2014. Primary objectives are: 1 Referral pattern: - What proportion of patients are referred for improvement of medical condition? - What proportion of patients are referred for an assessment of operability? 2 What interventions were recommended? - What was the influence of interventions on operability and timing of surgery? - Does the clinic improve theatre efficiency by reducing cancellations of patients who required further interdisciplinary discussion and investigations? Methods: Data collection will be based on the review of APOC-GSH clerking notes and hospital patient records. The following information will be collected and entered into an Excel spread sheet: the surgical discipline referring the patient, the proposed surgery, patient co-morbidities, the lead-time from the first APOC-GSH assessment to surgery, number of visits to APOC-GSH by each patient, the investigations and additional interventions instituted at APOC-GSH. We shall also calculate the proportion of patients that would have likely been cancelled had they not attended APOC-GSH but rather been assessed by an anaesthetist the day before surgery. The record of the APOC-GSH consultation will be documented on a clerking sheet established for use within the clinic (Addendum A). The original form will be included in the patients' file and a duplicate will be stored within the access controlled Department Of Anaesthesia offices at GSH. The duplicate records will be used to obtain the information for the audit. Ethical approval will be sought from the UCT Human Research Ethics Committee for the establishment of the database and retrospective review of the APOC-GSH records on the understanding that patient records would be kept confidential and that the data obtained would be stored in a password protected spreadsheet. Access to the spreadsheet will be limited to the investigators involved and no identifiable patient details will be included. Patients will be counselled as to the nature of the study and will be expected to submit signed consent forms allowing their records to be reviewed. Patients will be informed that they will not be disadvantaged by refusal to sign the consent form and that the appropriate standard of care will still be applied. No remuneration will be provided for partaking either. Consent will be documented on the consent form specifically designed for use in the APOC-GSH. (Addendum B) Statistical analysis will be performed using an Excel® spreadsheet. Means, medians, rates and percentages will be used to describe the discrete categorical data. Output and future work The audit will provide an objective assessment of the population profile referred to APOC-GSH. It may guide future implementation of APOC-GSH protocol changes and assist with resource allocation depending on the surgical discipline requirements. Patient and surgeon satisfaction ratings may be embarked at a later stage juxtaposed against an adequate assessment in a cost and time conscious manner. 2017-01-17T12:17:20Z 2017-01-17T12:17:20Z 2016 Master Thesis Masters MMed http://hdl.handle.net/11427/22755 eng application/pdf Department of Anaesthesia Faculty of Health Sciences University of Cape Town
spellingShingle Anaesthesiology
Dass, Deshandra
Anaesthesia Preoperative Clinic (APOC) Audit
thesis_degree_str Master's
title Anaesthesia Preoperative Clinic (APOC) Audit
title_full Anaesthesia Preoperative Clinic (APOC) Audit
title_fullStr Anaesthesia Preoperative Clinic (APOC) Audit
title_full_unstemmed Anaesthesia Preoperative Clinic (APOC) Audit
title_short Anaesthesia Preoperative Clinic (APOC) Audit
title_sort anaesthesia preoperative clinic apoc audit
topic Anaesthesiology
url http://hdl.handle.net/11427/22755
work_keys_str_mv AT dassdeshandra anaesthesiapreoperativeclinicapocaudit