Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

A critical evaluation of the 1964 preferencial agreement (Labour agreement) for Mozambique mineworkers in the light of the South Africa - Mozambique DTC and the SADC treaty

In 1964, a labour agreement was signed between the governments of South Africa and Portugal on behalf of its colony, Mozambique, to regulate the migration of Mozambican mineworkers to South African mines. In terms of this agreement the Mozambican mineworkers who received income on the South African...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bugan, Noel Arnold
Other Authors: West, Craig
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: Department of Finance and Tax 2017
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613992692744192
access_status_str Open Access
author Bugan, Noel Arnold
author2 West, Craig
author_browse Bugan, Noel Arnold
West, Craig
author_facet West, Craig
Bugan, Noel Arnold
author_sort Bugan, Noel Arnold
collection Thesis
description In 1964, a labour agreement was signed between the governments of South Africa and Portugal on behalf of its colony, Mozambique, to regulate the migration of Mozambican mineworkers to South African mines. In terms of this agreement the Mozambican mineworkers who received income on the South African mines were exempt from any taxes on their South African source income. Although outdated, the agreement is still in force today and is used by the South African mines to enter into employment contracts with Mozambican mineworkers. Many countries in the SADC region enter into double taxation agreements for the avoidance of double taxation. The 1964 labour agreement is quite unique as the income received by the Mozambican mineworkers is exempt from tax in South Africa for the duration of the contract (usually up to 18 months) entered into by the Mozambican mineworkers and their South African employers although the source of income is in South Africa. The challenge is whether this agreement should continue as an international agreement and whether it is discriminatory to exempt these mineworkers when compared to other mineworkers in the same position working in South Africa. The purpose of this study is to examine the application of this labour agreement with reference to the South African Income Tax Act and the double tax agreement with Mozambique. It further questions whether this agreement causes a revenue loss and whether or not such loss is justifiable. It further tests whether this agreement is a tax incentive and whether or not it leads to harmful tax competition in violation of the SADC agreement. Finally, the agreement is assessed in light of the discrimination article in the double tax agreement and based on section 9 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa. The main conclusion is whether the 1964 labour agreement should continue as an international agreement in the present circumstances as the agreement is fairly outdated and subject to various interpretations which will have an effect on revenue loss to the South African fiscus.
format Thesis
id oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/22919
institution University of Cape Town (South Africa)
language eng
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:44:57.792Z
license_str Not specified — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
publishDate 2017
publishDateRange 2017
publishDateSort 2017
publisher Department of Finance and Tax
publisherStr Department of Finance and Tax
record_format dspace
source_str UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
spelling oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/22919 A critical evaluation of the 1964 preferencial agreement (Labour agreement) for Mozambique mineworkers in the light of the South Africa - Mozambique DTC and the SADC treaty Bugan, Noel Arnold West, Craig International Taxation In 1964, a labour agreement was signed between the governments of South Africa and Portugal on behalf of its colony, Mozambique, to regulate the migration of Mozambican mineworkers to South African mines. In terms of this agreement the Mozambican mineworkers who received income on the South African mines were exempt from any taxes on their South African source income. Although outdated, the agreement is still in force today and is used by the South African mines to enter into employment contracts with Mozambican mineworkers. Many countries in the SADC region enter into double taxation agreements for the avoidance of double taxation. The 1964 labour agreement is quite unique as the income received by the Mozambican mineworkers is exempt from tax in South Africa for the duration of the contract (usually up to 18 months) entered into by the Mozambican mineworkers and their South African employers although the source of income is in South Africa. The challenge is whether this agreement should continue as an international agreement and whether it is discriminatory to exempt these mineworkers when compared to other mineworkers in the same position working in South Africa. The purpose of this study is to examine the application of this labour agreement with reference to the South African Income Tax Act and the double tax agreement with Mozambique. It further questions whether this agreement causes a revenue loss and whether or not such loss is justifiable. It further tests whether this agreement is a tax incentive and whether or not it leads to harmful tax competition in violation of the SADC agreement. Finally, the agreement is assessed in light of the discrimination article in the double tax agreement and based on section 9 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa. The main conclusion is whether the 1964 labour agreement should continue as an international agreement in the present circumstances as the agreement is fairly outdated and subject to various interpretations which will have an effect on revenue loss to the South African fiscus. 2017-01-23T07:57:39Z 2017-01-23T07:57:39Z 2016 Master Thesis Masters MCom http://hdl.handle.net/11427/22919 eng application/pdf Department of Finance and Tax Faculty of Commerce University of Cape Town
spellingShingle International Taxation
Bugan, Noel Arnold
A critical evaluation of the 1964 preferencial agreement (Labour agreement) for Mozambique mineworkers in the light of the South Africa - Mozambique DTC and the SADC treaty
thesis_degree_str Master's
title A critical evaluation of the 1964 preferencial agreement (Labour agreement) for Mozambique mineworkers in the light of the South Africa - Mozambique DTC and the SADC treaty
title_full A critical evaluation of the 1964 preferencial agreement (Labour agreement) for Mozambique mineworkers in the light of the South Africa - Mozambique DTC and the SADC treaty
title_fullStr A critical evaluation of the 1964 preferencial agreement (Labour agreement) for Mozambique mineworkers in the light of the South Africa - Mozambique DTC and the SADC treaty
title_full_unstemmed A critical evaluation of the 1964 preferencial agreement (Labour agreement) for Mozambique mineworkers in the light of the South Africa - Mozambique DTC and the SADC treaty
title_short A critical evaluation of the 1964 preferencial agreement (Labour agreement) for Mozambique mineworkers in the light of the South Africa - Mozambique DTC and the SADC treaty
title_sort critical evaluation of the 1964 preferencial agreement labour agreement for mozambique mineworkers in the light of the south africa mozambique dtc and the sadc treaty
topic International Taxation
url http://hdl.handle.net/11427/22919
work_keys_str_mv AT bugannoelarnold acriticalevaluationofthe1964preferencialagreementlabouragreementformozambiquemineworkersinthelightofthesouthafricamozambiquedtcandthesadctreaty
AT bugannoelarnold criticalevaluationofthe1964preferencialagreementlabouragreementformozambiquemineworkersinthelightofthesouthafricamozambiquedtcandthesadctreaty