Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

Bringing them together: integrating economic and social-ecological dimensions in corporate decision-making

The integration of economic, social and environmental dimensions is essential for corporate sustainability. Integration requires that there be no a priori priority among these dimensions. Economic priorities, however, often dominate decision-making processes in for-profit organisations. This thesis...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mayers, Nadine
Other Authors: Hamann, Ralph
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: Research of GSB 2017
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613700839440384
access_status_str Open Access
author Mayers, Nadine
author2 Hamann, Ralph
author_browse Hamann, Ralph
Mayers, Nadine
author_facet Hamann, Ralph
Mayers, Nadine
author_sort Mayers, Nadine
collection Thesis
description The integration of economic, social and environmental dimensions is essential for corporate sustainability. Integration requires that there be no a priori priority among these dimensions. Economic priorities, however, often dominate decision-making processes in for-profit organisations. This thesis asks how do organisations integrate predominant economic dimensions, on the one hand, and social-ecological dimensions, on the other? The question is focused on the middle management level, where relatively little is known about how competing organisational aspects are integrated. The study addresses a gap in theory relating to tensions in corporate sustainability by drawing on paradox, organisational ambidexterity and organisational identity literatures. The case study explored the research question from the lived experience of purposefully sampled research participants in a century-old mining company. The study focused on the integration of economic and social-ecological (E&SE) dimensions in the cross-functional decision-making process where mining projects are developed. Findings from the inductive analysis before and after the introduction of an intentional integration process revealed five dimensions of differentiation that were further explored. The analysis culminated in a process model of E&SE integration. I argue that E&SE integration on the middle management level is characterised by tensions between competing, interrelated priorities that constrain integration. Notwithstanding organisational commitment to corporate sustainability and E&SE integration, failure to manage these tensions perpetuates unsustainable outcomes in decision-making processes. The overarching contribution to corporate sustainability literature is a process model of E&SE integration on the middle management level that addresses the tensions that constrain integration. Integration is enabled by suspending premature convergence on a single option and by bringing social-ecological dimensions to the forefront in order to explore how E&SE dimensions are interdependent, before making binding choices. The study contributes to organisational ambidexterity literature by showing how the integration of strategic priorities on the middle management level is distinct from integration on the senior management level with respect to the quality of the decision and the locus of integration. The study also contributes to an emerging scholarly conversation regarding organisational purpose by identifying how reframing purpose into an integrative metaframe can enable commitment to an integrated decision-making process.
format Thesis
id oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/22964
institution University of Cape Town (South Africa)
language eng
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:40:19.459Z
license_str Not specified — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
publishDate 2017
publishDateRange 2017
publishDateSort 2017
publisher Research of GSB
publisherStr Research of GSB
record_format dspace
source_str UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
spelling oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/22964 Bringing them together: integrating economic and social-ecological dimensions in corporate decision-making Mayers, Nadine Hamann, Ralph Smit, Arnold Corporate Decision-making The integration of economic, social and environmental dimensions is essential for corporate sustainability. Integration requires that there be no a priori priority among these dimensions. Economic priorities, however, often dominate decision-making processes in for-profit organisations. This thesis asks how do organisations integrate predominant economic dimensions, on the one hand, and social-ecological dimensions, on the other? The question is focused on the middle management level, where relatively little is known about how competing organisational aspects are integrated. The study addresses a gap in theory relating to tensions in corporate sustainability by drawing on paradox, organisational ambidexterity and organisational identity literatures. The case study explored the research question from the lived experience of purposefully sampled research participants in a century-old mining company. The study focused on the integration of economic and social-ecological (E&SE) dimensions in the cross-functional decision-making process where mining projects are developed. Findings from the inductive analysis before and after the introduction of an intentional integration process revealed five dimensions of differentiation that were further explored. The analysis culminated in a process model of E&SE integration. I argue that E&SE integration on the middle management level is characterised by tensions between competing, interrelated priorities that constrain integration. Notwithstanding organisational commitment to corporate sustainability and E&SE integration, failure to manage these tensions perpetuates unsustainable outcomes in decision-making processes. The overarching contribution to corporate sustainability literature is a process model of E&SE integration on the middle management level that addresses the tensions that constrain integration. Integration is enabled by suspending premature convergence on a single option and by bringing social-ecological dimensions to the forefront in order to explore how E&SE dimensions are interdependent, before making binding choices. The study contributes to organisational ambidexterity literature by showing how the integration of strategic priorities on the middle management level is distinct from integration on the senior management level with respect to the quality of the decision and the locus of integration. The study also contributes to an emerging scholarly conversation regarding organisational purpose by identifying how reframing purpose into an integrative metaframe can enable commitment to an integrated decision-making process. 2017-01-24T09:05:36Z 2017-01-24T09:05:36Z 2016 Doctoral Thesis Doctoral PhD http://hdl.handle.net/11427/22964 eng application/pdf Research of GSB Faculty of Commerce University of Cape Town
spellingShingle Corporate Decision-making
Mayers, Nadine
Bringing them together: integrating economic and social-ecological dimensions in corporate decision-making
thesis_degree_str Doctoral
title Bringing them together: integrating economic and social-ecological dimensions in corporate decision-making
title_full Bringing them together: integrating economic and social-ecological dimensions in corporate decision-making
title_fullStr Bringing them together: integrating economic and social-ecological dimensions in corporate decision-making
title_full_unstemmed Bringing them together: integrating economic and social-ecological dimensions in corporate decision-making
title_short Bringing them together: integrating economic and social-ecological dimensions in corporate decision-making
title_sort bringing them together integrating economic and social ecological dimensions in corporate decision making
topic Corporate Decision-making
url http://hdl.handle.net/11427/22964
work_keys_str_mv AT mayersnadine bringingthemtogetherintegratingeconomicandsocialecologicaldimensionsincorporatedecisionmaking