Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

Nipping the bud hypothesis : a comparison of savannah and forest tree responses to canopy scorch

Tree mortality, following surfaces fires, is much greater in forests than in savannas, despite similarities in the bark thickness of tree trunks. This difference is thought to influence the distributions of forest and savanna biomes. There is no consensus and very little research on how fires actual...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Beckett, Heath
Other Authors: Bond, William J
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: Department of Biological Sciences 2017
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613340507832320
access_status_str Open Access
author Beckett, Heath
author2 Bond, William J
author_browse Beckett, Heath
Bond, William J
author_facet Bond, William J
Beckett, Heath
author_sort Beckett, Heath
collection Thesis
description Tree mortality, following surfaces fires, is much greater in forests than in savannas, despite similarities in the bark thickness of tree trunks. This difference is thought to influence the distributions of forest and savanna biomes. There is no consensus and very little research on how fires actually kill trees. Though tree canopies are too high above the flames to be charred, leaves are often scorched over the full tree height; hence the focus on differences in tree canopy recovery. I explored two possible mechanisms for differences in crown resprouting following canopy scorch: (1) differences in bud banks and their insulation, (2) differences in the vulnerability to disruption of the hydraulic system by heat scorch. I simulated canopy scorch using nine congeneric savanna-forest pairs in three Reserves in KwaZulu Natal, South Africa. Contrary to predictions, there was no difference in the presence of a viable bud bank between congeneric species. The resprouting response varied between congeneric pairs with only the Combretum, Rhus and Acacia pairs showing savanna species with a significantly greater ability to resprout. The vulnerability to hydraulic disruption was measured using wood density as a proxy for conduit reinforcement. The results are inconclusive and possibly affected by the growth rates of certain shade-tolerant forest trees. The differences in crown resprouting following canopy scorch of forest and savanna trees is not the result of differences in bud banks and resprouting ability. The differences in insulation of vulnerable tissue by bark may be related to the protection of the hydraulic system rather than the buds and/or cambium.
format Thesis
id oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/24851
institution University of Cape Town (South Africa)
language eng
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:34:33.896Z
license_str Not specified — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
publishDate 2017
publishDateRange 2017
publishDateSort 2017
publisher Department of Biological Sciences
publisherStr Department of Biological Sciences
record_format dspace
source_str UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
spelling oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/24851 Nipping the bud hypothesis : a comparison of savannah and forest tree responses to canopy scorch Beckett, Heath Bond, William J Botany Plant Ecology Tree mortality, following surfaces fires, is much greater in forests than in savannas, despite similarities in the bark thickness of tree trunks. This difference is thought to influence the distributions of forest and savanna biomes. There is no consensus and very little research on how fires actually kill trees. Though tree canopies are too high above the flames to be charred, leaves are often scorched over the full tree height; hence the focus on differences in tree canopy recovery. I explored two possible mechanisms for differences in crown resprouting following canopy scorch: (1) differences in bud banks and their insulation, (2) differences in the vulnerability to disruption of the hydraulic system by heat scorch. I simulated canopy scorch using nine congeneric savanna-forest pairs in three Reserves in KwaZulu Natal, South Africa. Contrary to predictions, there was no difference in the presence of a viable bud bank between congeneric species. The resprouting response varied between congeneric pairs with only the Combretum, Rhus and Acacia pairs showing savanna species with a significantly greater ability to resprout. The vulnerability to hydraulic disruption was measured using wood density as a proxy for conduit reinforcement. The results are inconclusive and possibly affected by the growth rates of certain shade-tolerant forest trees. The differences in crown resprouting following canopy scorch of forest and savanna trees is not the result of differences in bud banks and resprouting ability. The differences in insulation of vulnerable tissue by bark may be related to the protection of the hydraulic system rather than the buds and/or cambium. 2017-08-08T06:48:54Z 2017-08-08T06:48:54Z 2010 Bachelor Thesis Honours BSc (Hons) http://hdl.handle.net/11427/24851 eng application/pdf Department of Biological Sciences Faculty of Science University of Cape Town
spellingShingle Botany
Plant Ecology
Beckett, Heath
Nipping the bud hypothesis : a comparison of savannah and forest tree responses to canopy scorch
thesis_degree_str Bachelor's / Honours
title Nipping the bud hypothesis : a comparison of savannah and forest tree responses to canopy scorch
title_full Nipping the bud hypothesis : a comparison of savannah and forest tree responses to canopy scorch
title_fullStr Nipping the bud hypothesis : a comparison of savannah and forest tree responses to canopy scorch
title_full_unstemmed Nipping the bud hypothesis : a comparison of savannah and forest tree responses to canopy scorch
title_short Nipping the bud hypothesis : a comparison of savannah and forest tree responses to canopy scorch
title_sort nipping the bud hypothesis a comparison of savannah and forest tree responses to canopy scorch
topic Botany
Plant Ecology
url http://hdl.handle.net/11427/24851
work_keys_str_mv AT beckettheath nippingthebudhypothesisacomparisonofsavannahandforesttreeresponsestocanopyscorch