Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

Competition law's inclusion of public interest considerations in mergers and beyond: a potential paradox?

The inclusion of public interest considerations in competition law legislation has been controversial, dividing policy makers and economists alike. Debate has focused on the practical application of these public interest concerns when a merger is proposed, or when prohibited conduct is implicated. T...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Meyer, Nicholas
Other Authors: Davis, Dennis
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: Department of Commercial Law 2017
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613225372090368
access_status_str Open Access
author Meyer, Nicholas
author2 Davis, Dennis
author_browse Davis, Dennis
Meyer, Nicholas
author_facet Davis, Dennis
Meyer, Nicholas
author_sort Meyer, Nicholas
collection Thesis
description The inclusion of public interest considerations in competition law legislation has been controversial, dividing policy makers and economists alike. Debate has focused on the practical application of these public interest concerns when a merger is proposed, or when prohibited conduct is implicated. The uncertainty involved has had to be addressed by the competition authorities in recent years when dealing with high profile mergers and excessive pricing cases. This has necessitated development in somewhat unchartered legal terrain: the incorporation into competition policy of traditionally non-competition objectives. The traditional purpose of competition law has primarily been protecting and enhancing consumer welfare. Attempting to reconcile this objective with public interest considerations, which are now statutorily enshrined, presents significant challenges. However, South Africa's pressing economic redistributive justice needs provided compelling motivation for the legislature including public interest considerations in competition law, and authorities must remain cognizant of this. This paper critically considers whether it is appropriate for competition authorities to address welfare and public interest concerns, by analysing significant merger and prohibited conduct cases involving public interest considerations. A comparison into international approaches and trends in including public interest factors in competition control serves to provide global context. Furthermore, this paper interrogates the legitimacy of intervening in the public interest, whilst examining the tension between efficiency and equity.
format Thesis
id oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/25461
institution University of Cape Town (South Africa)
language eng
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:32:45.765Z
license_str Not specified — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
publishDate 2017
publishDateRange 2017
publishDateSort 2017
publisher Department of Commercial Law
publisherStr Department of Commercial Law
record_format dspace
source_str UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
spelling oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/25461 Competition law's inclusion of public interest considerations in mergers and beyond: a potential paradox? Meyer, Nicholas Davis, Dennis Competition Law The inclusion of public interest considerations in competition law legislation has been controversial, dividing policy makers and economists alike. Debate has focused on the practical application of these public interest concerns when a merger is proposed, or when prohibited conduct is implicated. The uncertainty involved has had to be addressed by the competition authorities in recent years when dealing with high profile mergers and excessive pricing cases. This has necessitated development in somewhat unchartered legal terrain: the incorporation into competition policy of traditionally non-competition objectives. The traditional purpose of competition law has primarily been protecting and enhancing consumer welfare. Attempting to reconcile this objective with public interest considerations, which are now statutorily enshrined, presents significant challenges. However, South Africa's pressing economic redistributive justice needs provided compelling motivation for the legislature including public interest considerations in competition law, and authorities must remain cognizant of this. This paper critically considers whether it is appropriate for competition authorities to address welfare and public interest concerns, by analysing significant merger and prohibited conduct cases involving public interest considerations. A comparison into international approaches and trends in including public interest factors in competition control serves to provide global context. Furthermore, this paper interrogates the legitimacy of intervening in the public interest, whilst examining the tension between efficiency and equity. 2017-09-28T05:35:19Z 2017-09-28T05:35:19Z 2017 Master Thesis Masters LLM http://hdl.handle.net/11427/25461 eng application/pdf Department of Commercial Law Faculty of Law University of Cape Town
spellingShingle Competition Law
Meyer, Nicholas
Competition law's inclusion of public interest considerations in mergers and beyond: a potential paradox?
thesis_degree_str Master's
title Competition law's inclusion of public interest considerations in mergers and beyond: a potential paradox?
title_full Competition law's inclusion of public interest considerations in mergers and beyond: a potential paradox?
title_fullStr Competition law's inclusion of public interest considerations in mergers and beyond: a potential paradox?
title_full_unstemmed Competition law's inclusion of public interest considerations in mergers and beyond: a potential paradox?
title_short Competition law's inclusion of public interest considerations in mergers and beyond: a potential paradox?
title_sort competition law s inclusion of public interest considerations in mergers and beyond a potential paradox
topic Competition Law
url http://hdl.handle.net/11427/25461
work_keys_str_mv AT meyernicholas competitionlawsinclusionofpublicinterestconsiderationsinmergersandbeyondapotentialparadox