Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

Examining land reform in South Africa: evidence from survey data

Land and land reform have long been contentious and highly charged topics in South Africa, with land performing the dual functions of redress for the past and development for the future. This research explores both these aspects of land, with the focus being on the impact of land receipt on househol...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ryan, Joanna
Other Authors: Leibbrandt, Murray
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: School of Economics 2018
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613332300627968
access_status_str Open Access
author Ryan, Joanna
author2 Leibbrandt, Murray
author_browse Leibbrandt, Murray
Ryan, Joanna
author_facet Leibbrandt, Murray
Ryan, Joanna
author_sort Ryan, Joanna
collection Thesis
description Land and land reform have long been contentious and highly charged topics in South Africa, with land performing the dual functions of redress for the past and development for the future. This research explores both these aspects of land, with the focus being on the impact of land receipt on household welfare and food insecurity, and social preferences for fairness and redistribution more generally. One of the main aims is to contribute to the land reform debate by providing previously-lacking quantitative evidence on the aggregate welfare outcomes of land redistribution, as well as the extent of social preferences for redistribution in the land restitution framework. In exploring these issues, the welfare outcomes of land are first explored using the National Income Dynamics Study (NIDS) data and unconditional quantile regression analysis. The focus is then narrowed to the food insecurity impact of land receipt, beginning with a methodological chapter outlining the development of a new food insecurity index applying the Alkire-Foster method of multidimensional poverty measurement (2009; 2011). This is followed by the presentation and discussion of food insecurity profiles of land beneficiary and non-beneficiary households. The new index is also used as an outcome measure in exploring the determinants of household food insecurity. These two sections again use the NIDS data. The final section shifts the emphasis from the economic welfare benefits of land redistribution to notions of fairness and social justice encapsulated by land restitution. A behavioural laboratory experiment is used to investigate social preferences for fairness, and the factors that influence redistributive inclinations, by exploring the relative weights placed on fairness considerations and self-interest, as well as the fairness ideal. The findings indicate that beneficiaries do not use the land received for productive purposes, a possible explanation for the limited economic welfare impacts of land reform that are observed. Despite this limited developmental impact, the laboratory experiment makes it clear that land reform plays an important role in addressing other needs and wants in society, particularly in respect of preferences for fairness and addressing historical injustices.
format Thesis
id oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/26945
institution University of Cape Town (South Africa)
language eng
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:34:27.383Z
license_str Not specified — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
publishDate 2018
publishDateRange 2018
publishDateSort 2018
publisher School of Economics
publisherStr School of Economics
record_format dspace
source_str UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
spelling oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/26945 Examining land reform in South Africa: evidence from survey data Ryan, Joanna Leibbrandt, Murray Piraino, Patrizio Land Reform Poverty and Inequality Research Land and land reform have long been contentious and highly charged topics in South Africa, with land performing the dual functions of redress for the past and development for the future. This research explores both these aspects of land, with the focus being on the impact of land receipt on household welfare and food insecurity, and social preferences for fairness and redistribution more generally. One of the main aims is to contribute to the land reform debate by providing previously-lacking quantitative evidence on the aggregate welfare outcomes of land redistribution, as well as the extent of social preferences for redistribution in the land restitution framework. In exploring these issues, the welfare outcomes of land are first explored using the National Income Dynamics Study (NIDS) data and unconditional quantile regression analysis. The focus is then narrowed to the food insecurity impact of land receipt, beginning with a methodological chapter outlining the development of a new food insecurity index applying the Alkire-Foster method of multidimensional poverty measurement (2009; 2011). This is followed by the presentation and discussion of food insecurity profiles of land beneficiary and non-beneficiary households. The new index is also used as an outcome measure in exploring the determinants of household food insecurity. These two sections again use the NIDS data. The final section shifts the emphasis from the economic welfare benefits of land redistribution to notions of fairness and social justice encapsulated by land restitution. A behavioural laboratory experiment is used to investigate social preferences for fairness, and the factors that influence redistributive inclinations, by exploring the relative weights placed on fairness considerations and self-interest, as well as the fairness ideal. The findings indicate that beneficiaries do not use the land received for productive purposes, a possible explanation for the limited economic welfare impacts of land reform that are observed. Despite this limited developmental impact, the laboratory experiment makes it clear that land reform plays an important role in addressing other needs and wants in society, particularly in respect of preferences for fairness and addressing historical injustices. 2018-01-25T06:38:52Z 2018-01-25T06:38:52Z 2017 Doctoral Thesis Doctoral PhD http://hdl.handle.net/11427/26945 eng application/pdf School of Economics Faculty of Commerce University of Cape Town
spellingShingle Land Reform
Poverty and Inequality Research
Ryan, Joanna
Examining land reform in South Africa: evidence from survey data
thesis_degree_str Doctoral
title Examining land reform in South Africa: evidence from survey data
title_full Examining land reform in South Africa: evidence from survey data
title_fullStr Examining land reform in South Africa: evidence from survey data
title_full_unstemmed Examining land reform in South Africa: evidence from survey data
title_short Examining land reform in South Africa: evidence from survey data
title_sort examining land reform in south africa evidence from survey data
topic Land Reform
Poverty and Inequality Research
url http://hdl.handle.net/11427/26945
work_keys_str_mv AT ryanjoanna examininglandreforminsouthafricaevidencefromsurveydata