Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

The value relevance of accounting measures based on international financial reporting standards (IFRS) before, during and after hyperinflation period in Zimbabwe

This study examines the value relevance of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) based accounting measures for the periods before, during and after hyperinflation in Zimbabwe. The study uses a sample of 30 listed companies for the entire period from 1996 to 2013. It uses the fixed effec...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Makaya, Martin
Other Authors: Chamisa, Edward E
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: Department of Finance and Tax 2018
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613231422373888
access_status_str Open Access
author Makaya, Martin
author2 Chamisa, Edward E
author_browse Chamisa, Edward E
Makaya, Martin
author_facet Chamisa, Edward E
Makaya, Martin
author_sort Makaya, Martin
collection Thesis
description This study examines the value relevance of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) based accounting measures for the periods before, during and after hyperinflation in Zimbabwe. The study uses a sample of 30 listed companies for the entire period from 1996 to 2013. It uses the fixed effects (FE) technique to examine the value relevance of IFRS based accounting numbers using the price model as the main tool for analysis and thereafter, the returns model as an additional tool for further analysis to this study Using the price model, the results show that IFRS based accounting measures in the form of earnings per share (EPS) and book value of equity per share (BVPS) are more value relevant before and during the hyperinflation periods relative to the after-hyperinflation period using the share prices 4 months after year end as proxies for firm value. The results also show that EPS is more value relevant before and during the hyperinflation period where as BVPS is not. The results further show that both EPS and BVPS are not value relevant for the period after hyperinflation when share prices 4 months after year end are used in the analysis. Further tests under the price model show no change in the conclusions reached if share prices 5 and 6 months after year end are used. Furthermore, tests based on a year on year analysis show that IFRS based accounting measures were more value relevant before and during the hyperinflation period relative to the after the hyperinflation period. In addition, for the period during hyperinflation, the year on year analysis shows that the EPS measure was value relevant for all the years while the BVPS was not for the years 2003 and 2005. A further test on whether historical cost IFRS based accounting measures are more value relevant than inflation adjusted IFRS based accounting measures (used in the main analysis) was also conducted for the period during hyperinflation (i.e. 2000-2005 only). The results based on this analysis show that both historical cost and inflation adjusted IFRS based accounting measures are value relevant during a hyperinflationary period irrespective of whether share prices 4, 5 or 6 months are used as proxies for firm value. Thus, this finding shows that historical cost and inflation adjusted accounting information should be used as complements and not as substitutes for each other. Using the returns model under additional analysis, the results further show that the accounting measures were more value relevant before and during the hyperinflation periods relative to the after-hyperinflation period. The results also show that EPS was value relevant before and during hyperinflation irrespective of whether share returns 4, 5 or 6 months after year end were used in the analysis. In addition, further tests based on the returns model show that both historical cost and inflation adjusted sets of accounting measures are value relevant for share valuation purposes during the hyperinflation period. This finding confirms that both historical cost and inflation adjusted accounting measures are value relevant and thus should be used jointly.
format Thesis
id oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/27999
institution University of Cape Town (South Africa)
language eng
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:32:51.499Z
license_str Not specified — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
publishDate 2018
publishDateRange 2018
publishDateSort 2018
publisher Department of Finance and Tax
publisherStr Department of Finance and Tax
record_format dspace
source_str UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
spelling oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/27999 The value relevance of accounting measures based on international financial reporting standards (IFRS) before, during and after hyperinflation period in Zimbabwe Makaya, Martin Chamisa, Edward E Finance Accounting Standards This study examines the value relevance of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) based accounting measures for the periods before, during and after hyperinflation in Zimbabwe. The study uses a sample of 30 listed companies for the entire period from 1996 to 2013. It uses the fixed effects (FE) technique to examine the value relevance of IFRS based accounting numbers using the price model as the main tool for analysis and thereafter, the returns model as an additional tool for further analysis to this study Using the price model, the results show that IFRS based accounting measures in the form of earnings per share (EPS) and book value of equity per share (BVPS) are more value relevant before and during the hyperinflation periods relative to the after-hyperinflation period using the share prices 4 months after year end as proxies for firm value. The results also show that EPS is more value relevant before and during the hyperinflation period where as BVPS is not. The results further show that both EPS and BVPS are not value relevant for the period after hyperinflation when share prices 4 months after year end are used in the analysis. Further tests under the price model show no change in the conclusions reached if share prices 5 and 6 months after year end are used. Furthermore, tests based on a year on year analysis show that IFRS based accounting measures were more value relevant before and during the hyperinflation period relative to the after the hyperinflation period. In addition, for the period during hyperinflation, the year on year analysis shows that the EPS measure was value relevant for all the years while the BVPS was not for the years 2003 and 2005. A further test on whether historical cost IFRS based accounting measures are more value relevant than inflation adjusted IFRS based accounting measures (used in the main analysis) was also conducted for the period during hyperinflation (i.e. 2000-2005 only). The results based on this analysis show that both historical cost and inflation adjusted IFRS based accounting measures are value relevant during a hyperinflationary period irrespective of whether share prices 4, 5 or 6 months are used as proxies for firm value. Thus, this finding shows that historical cost and inflation adjusted accounting information should be used as complements and not as substitutes for each other. Using the returns model under additional analysis, the results further show that the accounting measures were more value relevant before and during the hyperinflation periods relative to the after-hyperinflation period. The results also show that EPS was value relevant before and during hyperinflation irrespective of whether share returns 4, 5 or 6 months after year end were used in the analysis. In addition, further tests based on the returns model show that both historical cost and inflation adjusted sets of accounting measures are value relevant for share valuation purposes during the hyperinflation period. This finding confirms that both historical cost and inflation adjusted accounting measures are value relevant and thus should be used jointly. 2018-05-07T14:24:44Z 2018-05-07T14:24:44Z 2018 Master Thesis Masters MCom http://hdl.handle.net/11427/27999 eng application/pdf Department of Finance and Tax Faculty of Commerce University of Cape Town
spellingShingle Finance
Accounting Standards
Makaya, Martin
The value relevance of accounting measures based on international financial reporting standards (IFRS) before, during and after hyperinflation period in Zimbabwe
thesis_degree_str Master's
title The value relevance of accounting measures based on international financial reporting standards (IFRS) before, during and after hyperinflation period in Zimbabwe
title_full The value relevance of accounting measures based on international financial reporting standards (IFRS) before, during and after hyperinflation period in Zimbabwe
title_fullStr The value relevance of accounting measures based on international financial reporting standards (IFRS) before, during and after hyperinflation period in Zimbabwe
title_full_unstemmed The value relevance of accounting measures based on international financial reporting standards (IFRS) before, during and after hyperinflation period in Zimbabwe
title_short The value relevance of accounting measures based on international financial reporting standards (IFRS) before, during and after hyperinflation period in Zimbabwe
title_sort value relevance of accounting measures based on international financial reporting standards ifrs before during and after hyperinflation period in zimbabwe
topic Finance
Accounting Standards
url http://hdl.handle.net/11427/27999
work_keys_str_mv AT makayamartin thevaluerelevanceofaccountingmeasuresbasedoninternationalfinancialreportingstandardsifrsbeforeduringandafterhyperinflationperiodinzimbabwe
AT makayamartin valuerelevanceofaccountingmeasuresbasedoninternationalfinancialreportingstandardsifrsbeforeduringandafterhyperinflationperiodinzimbabwe