Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

When is a debt bad or doubtful in terms of the Income Tax Act?

Bad debt deductions and doubtful debt allowances provide relief to taxpayers who would be subject to income tax on amounts accrued to them which may never be received. No definition of a bad or doubtful debt is provided in the Income Tax Act. This dissertation considered current legislation, histori...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hartley, Ryan
Other Authors: Johnson, Tracy
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: Department of Finance and Tax 2019
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613467957002240
access_status_str Open Access
author Hartley, Ryan
author2 Johnson, Tracy
author_browse Hartley, Ryan
Johnson, Tracy
author_facet Johnson, Tracy
Hartley, Ryan
author_sort Hartley, Ryan
collection Thesis
description Bad debt deductions and doubtful debt allowances provide relief to taxpayers who would be subject to income tax on amounts accrued to them which may never be received. No definition of a bad or doubtful debt is provided in the Income Tax Act. This dissertation considered current legislation, historical court cases, academic writing and the views expressed by SARS through explanatory memoranda and directives in order to establish when a debt becomes bad or doubtful and the extent of the relief granted. This dissertation also considered the future of the doubtful debt allowance in light of the change of accounting standards from IAS 39 to IFRS 9. There are no specific requirements for a debt to become bad or doubtful. Whether a debt is bad is a factual question taking into account all relevant facts. Whether a debt is doubtful and the extent of the allowance granted is determined by the Commissioner, but that determination must be reasonable. The Commissioner relies on IAS 39 rules of impairment as the starting point for determination of a doubtful debt allowance. IFRS 9 determines impairment in a significantly different manner to IAS 39, abandoning the requirement that a “loss event” must have occurred. Adoption of IFRS 9 will result in a change to the determination of doubtful debt allowances, for example, by reducing the generally accepted rate of 25% of identified doubtful debts or by requiring the taxpayer to compile a list of debts which would have qualified as doubtful under IAS 39.
format Thesis
id oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/29559
institution University of Cape Town (South Africa)
language eng
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:36:37.365Z
license_str Not specified — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
publishDate 2019
publishDateRange 2019
publishDateSort 2019
publisher Department of Finance and Tax
publisherStr Department of Finance and Tax
record_format dspace
source_str UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
spelling oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/29559 When is a debt bad or doubtful in terms of the Income Tax Act? Hartley, Ryan Johnson, Tracy South African Taxation Bad debt doubtful debt discretion IAS 39 IFRS 9 income tax Bad debt deductions and doubtful debt allowances provide relief to taxpayers who would be subject to income tax on amounts accrued to them which may never be received. No definition of a bad or doubtful debt is provided in the Income Tax Act. This dissertation considered current legislation, historical court cases, academic writing and the views expressed by SARS through explanatory memoranda and directives in order to establish when a debt becomes bad or doubtful and the extent of the relief granted. This dissertation also considered the future of the doubtful debt allowance in light of the change of accounting standards from IAS 39 to IFRS 9. There are no specific requirements for a debt to become bad or doubtful. Whether a debt is bad is a factual question taking into account all relevant facts. Whether a debt is doubtful and the extent of the allowance granted is determined by the Commissioner, but that determination must be reasonable. The Commissioner relies on IAS 39 rules of impairment as the starting point for determination of a doubtful debt allowance. IFRS 9 determines impairment in a significantly different manner to IAS 39, abandoning the requirement that a “loss event” must have occurred. Adoption of IFRS 9 will result in a change to the determination of doubtful debt allowances, for example, by reducing the generally accepted rate of 25% of identified doubtful debts or by requiring the taxpayer to compile a list of debts which would have qualified as doubtful under IAS 39. 2019-02-18T09:10:47Z 2019-02-18T09:10:47Z 2018 2019-02-18T09:04:01Z Master Thesis Masters MCom http://hdl.handle.net/11427/29559 eng application/pdf Department of Finance and Tax Faculty of Commerce University of Cape Town
spellingShingle South African Taxation
Bad debt
doubtful debt
discretion
IAS 39
IFRS 9
income tax
Hartley, Ryan
When is a debt bad or doubtful in terms of the Income Tax Act?
thesis_degree_str Master's
title When is a debt bad or doubtful in terms of the Income Tax Act?
title_full When is a debt bad or doubtful in terms of the Income Tax Act?
title_fullStr When is a debt bad or doubtful in terms of the Income Tax Act?
title_full_unstemmed When is a debt bad or doubtful in terms of the Income Tax Act?
title_short When is a debt bad or doubtful in terms of the Income Tax Act?
title_sort when is a debt bad or doubtful in terms of the income tax act
topic South African Taxation
Bad debt
doubtful debt
discretion
IAS 39
IFRS 9
income tax
url http://hdl.handle.net/11427/29559
work_keys_str_mv AT hartleyryan whenisadebtbadordoubtfulintermsoftheincometaxact