Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

Novel Approaches to Global Benchmarking of Risk-Adjusted Surgical Outcomes

Background Despite the existence of multiple validated risk-assessment and quality benchmarking tools in surgery, their utility outside of High Income Countries is limited. We sought to derive, validate and apply a scoring system that is both 1) feasible, and 2) reliably predicts mortality in a Mi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Spence, Richard Trafford
Other Authors: Panieri, Eugenio
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: Department of Surgery 2019
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613506329640960
access_status_str Open Access
author Spence, Richard Trafford
author2 Panieri, Eugenio
author_browse Panieri, Eugenio
Spence, Richard Trafford
author_facet Panieri, Eugenio
Spence, Richard Trafford
author_sort Spence, Richard Trafford
collection Thesis
description Background Despite the existence of multiple validated risk-assessment and quality benchmarking tools in surgery, their utility outside of High Income Countries is limited. We sought to derive, validate and apply a scoring system that is both 1) feasible, and 2) reliably predicts mortality in a Middle Income Country (MIC) context. Methods A 5-step methodology was used: 1. Development of a de novo surgical outcomes database modeled around the American College of Surgeons’ National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) in South Africa (SA Dataset) 2. Use of the resultant data to identify all predictors of in-hospital death with more than 90% capture indicating feasibility of collection 3. Use these predictors to derive and validate an integer-based score that reliably predicts in-hospital death in the 2012 ACS-NSQIP 4. Apply the score in the original SA dataset and demonstrate it’s performance 5. Identify threshold cutoffs of the score to prompt action and drive quality improvement. Results Following Step one-three above, the 13 point Codman’s score was derived and validated on 211,737 and 109,079 patients, respectively, and includes: 1) age≥65 (1), partially or completely dependent functional status (1), preoperative transfusions≥4 units (1), emergency operation (2), sepsis or septic shock (2) American Society of Anesthesia (ASA) score ≥3 (3) and operative procedure (1-3). Application of the score to 373 patients in the SA dataset showed good discrimination and calibration to predict an inhospital death. A Codman Score of 8 is an optimal cutoff point for defining expected and unexpected deaths. Conclusion We have designed a novel risk prediction score specific for a MIC context. The Codman Score can prove useful for both 1) preoperative decision-making and 2) benchmarking the quality of surgical care in MIC’s.
format Thesis
id oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/29635
institution University of Cape Town (South Africa)
language eng
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:37:13.959Z
license_str Not specified — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
publishDate 2019
publishDateRange 2019
publishDateSort 2019
publisher Department of Surgery
publisherStr Department of Surgery
record_format dspace
source_str UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
spelling oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/29635 Novel Approaches to Global Benchmarking of Risk-Adjusted Surgical Outcomes Spence, Richard Trafford Panieri, Eugenio Surgery Background Despite the existence of multiple validated risk-assessment and quality benchmarking tools in surgery, their utility outside of High Income Countries is limited. We sought to derive, validate and apply a scoring system that is both 1) feasible, and 2) reliably predicts mortality in a Middle Income Country (MIC) context. Methods A 5-step methodology was used: 1. Development of a de novo surgical outcomes database modeled around the American College of Surgeons’ National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) in South Africa (SA Dataset) 2. Use of the resultant data to identify all predictors of in-hospital death with more than 90% capture indicating feasibility of collection 3. Use these predictors to derive and validate an integer-based score that reliably predicts in-hospital death in the 2012 ACS-NSQIP 4. Apply the score in the original SA dataset and demonstrate it’s performance 5. Identify threshold cutoffs of the score to prompt action and drive quality improvement. Results Following Step one-three above, the 13 point Codman’s score was derived and validated on 211,737 and 109,079 patients, respectively, and includes: 1) age≥65 (1), partially or completely dependent functional status (1), preoperative transfusions≥4 units (1), emergency operation (2), sepsis or septic shock (2) American Society of Anesthesia (ASA) score ≥3 (3) and operative procedure (1-3). Application of the score to 373 patients in the SA dataset showed good discrimination and calibration to predict an inhospital death. A Codman Score of 8 is an optimal cutoff point for defining expected and unexpected deaths. Conclusion We have designed a novel risk prediction score specific for a MIC context. The Codman Score can prove useful for both 1) preoperative decision-making and 2) benchmarking the quality of surgical care in MIC’s. 2019-02-18T11:29:22Z 2019-02-18T11:29:22Z 2018 2019-02-15T08:24:44Z Master Thesis Masters MMed http://hdl.handle.net/11427/29635 eng application/pdf Department of Surgery Faculty of Health Sciences University of Cape Town
spellingShingle Surgery
Spence, Richard Trafford
Novel Approaches to Global Benchmarking of Risk-Adjusted Surgical Outcomes
thesis_degree_str Master's
title Novel Approaches to Global Benchmarking of Risk-Adjusted Surgical Outcomes
title_full Novel Approaches to Global Benchmarking of Risk-Adjusted Surgical Outcomes
title_fullStr Novel Approaches to Global Benchmarking of Risk-Adjusted Surgical Outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Novel Approaches to Global Benchmarking of Risk-Adjusted Surgical Outcomes
title_short Novel Approaches to Global Benchmarking of Risk-Adjusted Surgical Outcomes
title_sort novel approaches to global benchmarking of risk adjusted surgical outcomes
topic Surgery
url http://hdl.handle.net/11427/29635
work_keys_str_mv AT spencerichardtrafford novelapproachestoglobalbenchmarkingofriskadjustedsurgicaloutcomes