Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

Health committees in South Africa: the Influence of power on invited participation in policy and practice

This study explores how the presence of multiple forms of power impact health committee participation in South Africa’s Western Cape Province in policy and practice. A qualitative case study with a rural and an urban committee is used to explore the research question. The study’s conceptual framewor...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Haricharan, Hanne Jensen
Other Authors: Colvin, Christopher J.
Format: Thesis
Language:Eng
Published: Department of Public Health and Family Medicine 2019
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613305386827776
access_status_str Open Access
author Haricharan, Hanne Jensen
author2 Colvin, Christopher J.
author_browse Colvin, Christopher J.
Haricharan, Hanne Jensen
author_facet Colvin, Christopher J.
Haricharan, Hanne Jensen
author_sort Haricharan, Hanne Jensen
collection Thesis
description This study explores how the presence of multiple forms of power impact health committee participation in South Africa’s Western Cape Province in policy and practice. A qualitative case study with a rural and an urban committee is used to explore the research question. The study’s conceptual framework views health committees as invited spaces where citizens are invited to participate, in contrast to closed spaces without citizen involvement and claimed spaces where citizens claim participation. The study considers the impact of three different forms of power, namely: a) countervailing power, an external form of power, which neutralises power differentials between officials and community members; b) constraining power, which limits influence; and c) enabling power, which promotes agency. Three models for invited participation are identified: 1) Appointed participation, envisioned in the Western Cape Health Facility Boards and Committees Act (2016); 2) An organisational model, preferred by the health committees; and 3) An election model, considered in policy documents. The study found that the health committee Act provides health committees with countervailing power in the form of a mandate. However, the content of the Act ensures that the Health Department controls who participates through ministerial appointments and limits health committees’ influence through stipulating narrow roles. The practiced organisational model generates countervailing power through a claim to represent communities, but this claim is challenged by weak community links and accountability mechanisms and the fact that only organised sections are represented. Furthermore, the study demonstrates that absence of countervailing power and presence of constraining forms of power limit health committees’ influence, though they also draw on enabling forms of power. In addition, the study demonstrates that when citizens have limited influence in invited spaces, they consider creating claimed spaces. Finally, the study argues that a model with elected community representatives may provide stronger countervailing power as elections may enable health committee representatives to claim to represent the entire community. The thesis concludes that invited participation may generate sufficient countervailing power when it is legislated and based on a human rights approach, which positions committees as claim-makers and the state as duty-bearer. Furthermore, it concludes that both countervailing power and enabling power is necessary for effective substantive participation.
format Thesis
id oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/30371
institution University of Cape Town (South Africa)
language Eng
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:34:00.978Z
license_str Not specified — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
publishDate 2019
publishDateRange 2019
publishDateSort 2019
publisher Department of Public Health and Family Medicine
publisherStr Department of Public Health and Family Medicine
record_format dspace
source_str UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
spelling oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/30371 Health committees in South Africa: the Influence of power on invited participation in policy and practice Haricharan, Hanne Jensen Colvin, Christopher J. London, Leslie This study explores how the presence of multiple forms of power impact health committee participation in South Africa’s Western Cape Province in policy and practice. A qualitative case study with a rural and an urban committee is used to explore the research question. The study’s conceptual framework views health committees as invited spaces where citizens are invited to participate, in contrast to closed spaces without citizen involvement and claimed spaces where citizens claim participation. The study considers the impact of three different forms of power, namely: a) countervailing power, an external form of power, which neutralises power differentials between officials and community members; b) constraining power, which limits influence; and c) enabling power, which promotes agency. Three models for invited participation are identified: 1) Appointed participation, envisioned in the Western Cape Health Facility Boards and Committees Act (2016); 2) An organisational model, preferred by the health committees; and 3) An election model, considered in policy documents. The study found that the health committee Act provides health committees with countervailing power in the form of a mandate. However, the content of the Act ensures that the Health Department controls who participates through ministerial appointments and limits health committees’ influence through stipulating narrow roles. The practiced organisational model generates countervailing power through a claim to represent communities, but this claim is challenged by weak community links and accountability mechanisms and the fact that only organised sections are represented. Furthermore, the study demonstrates that absence of countervailing power and presence of constraining forms of power limit health committees’ influence, though they also draw on enabling forms of power. In addition, the study demonstrates that when citizens have limited influence in invited spaces, they consider creating claimed spaces. Finally, the study argues that a model with elected community representatives may provide stronger countervailing power as elections may enable health committee representatives to claim to represent the entire community. The thesis concludes that invited participation may generate sufficient countervailing power when it is legislated and based on a human rights approach, which positions committees as claim-makers and the state as duty-bearer. Furthermore, it concludes that both countervailing power and enabling power is necessary for effective substantive participation. 2019-08-01T07:41:20Z 2019-08-01T07:41:20Z 2019 2019-07-31T10:31:44Z Doctoral Thesis Doctoral PhD http://hdl.handle.net/11427/30371 Eng application/pdf Department of Public Health and Family Medicine Faculty of Health Sciences
spellingShingle Haricharan, Hanne Jensen
Health committees in South Africa: the Influence of power on invited participation in policy and practice
thesis_degree_str Doctoral
title Health committees in South Africa: the Influence of power on invited participation in policy and practice
title_full Health committees in South Africa: the Influence of power on invited participation in policy and practice
title_fullStr Health committees in South Africa: the Influence of power on invited participation in policy and practice
title_full_unstemmed Health committees in South Africa: the Influence of power on invited participation in policy and practice
title_short Health committees in South Africa: the Influence of power on invited participation in policy and practice
title_sort health committees in south africa the influence of power on invited participation in policy and practice
url http://hdl.handle.net/11427/30371
work_keys_str_mv AT haricharanhannejensen healthcommitteesinsouthafricatheinfluenceofpoweroninvitedparticipationinpolicyandpractice