Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

A framework for discretionary effort based on performance expectancies in integrated work environment

In an age of immense business competition, and far-reaching leadership requirements, Discretionary Effort is required as part of a value creation and enhanced performance strategy. Discretionary Effort is the unsolicited effort, which employees expend when certain work expectations are met. Traditio...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Katoma, Victor
Other Authors: April, Kurt
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: Graduate School of Business (GSB) 2019
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613162635788289
access_status_str Open Access
author Katoma, Victor
author2 April, Kurt
author_browse April, Kurt
Katoma, Victor
author_facet April, Kurt
Katoma, Victor
author_sort Katoma, Victor
collection Thesis
description In an age of immense business competition, and far-reaching leadership requirements, Discretionary Effort is required as part of a value creation and enhanced performance strategy. Discretionary Effort is the unsolicited effort, which employees expend when certain work expectations are met. Traditionally, Expectancy, Valence and Instrumentality (VIE) have been the leading variables of this construct. Research has however, revealed that self-affirmation (A) adds another important dimension to the Discretionary Effort Framework (VIEA) (April &amp; Katoma, 2008). This research investigated Discretionary Effort (the full VIEA) in an integrated work environment, using professional networks, consisting primarily of 1548 managers and specialists, who were either co-located or virtually located in different sectors. The survey instrument was divided into four parts, with the first and second parts measuring expectancies at individual and work level respectively. The third and fourth parts measured the degree of discretionary behavior of employees, and the extent to which organizations considered these relevant. The data were collected through faxes, emails, and online survey tools from employees attending leadership courses at the Business School. Results revealed that Discretionary Effort was not significantly different in clusters at the micro level of units of employees, but significantly different at the macro (sector) level - with service-oriented sectors, such as retail, scoring higher Discretionary Effort compared to product-oriented industries, such as engineering. Within the clusters or units, process-oriented influencer variables, such as experience, showed significant effects on the aforementioned Discretionary variables. Employees were also more generally concerned with higher levels of needs (social needs), as specified in Maslow's hierarchy of needs (Maslow, 1968), partly due to interpersonal interrelations and knowledge-dependent professional networks. The most significant hypotheses included individual network learning, team sustainability, effort learning all at p<.001, while interpersonal performance and mutual reciprocity were at p<.10. Construct validity, using covariates, revealed an acceptable Discretionary Effort model fit of VIEA: χ = 102, df = 17, RMSEA = .0584, NFI = .95, CFI = .95 and GFI = .983.
format Thesis
id oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/30554
institution University of Cape Town (South Africa)
language eng
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:31:45.395Z
license_str Not specified — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
publishDate 2019
publishDateRange 2019
publishDateSort 2019
publisher Graduate School of Business (GSB)
publisherStr Graduate School of Business (GSB)
record_format dspace
source_str UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
spelling oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/30554 A framework for discretionary effort based on performance expectancies in integrated work environment Katoma, Victor April, Kurt In an age of immense business competition, and far-reaching leadership requirements, Discretionary Effort is required as part of a value creation and enhanced performance strategy. Discretionary Effort is the unsolicited effort, which employees expend when certain work expectations are met. Traditionally, Expectancy, Valence and Instrumentality (VIE) have been the leading variables of this construct. Research has however, revealed that self-affirmation (A) adds another important dimension to the Discretionary Effort Framework (VIEA) (April &amp; Katoma, 2008). This research investigated Discretionary Effort (the full VIEA) in an integrated work environment, using professional networks, consisting primarily of 1548 managers and specialists, who were either co-located or virtually located in different sectors. The survey instrument was divided into four parts, with the first and second parts measuring expectancies at individual and work level respectively. The third and fourth parts measured the degree of discretionary behavior of employees, and the extent to which organizations considered these relevant. The data were collected through faxes, emails, and online survey tools from employees attending leadership courses at the Business School. Results revealed that Discretionary Effort was not significantly different in clusters at the micro level of units of employees, but significantly different at the macro (sector) level - with service-oriented sectors, such as retail, scoring higher Discretionary Effort compared to product-oriented industries, such as engineering. Within the clusters or units, process-oriented influencer variables, such as experience, showed significant effects on the aforementioned Discretionary variables. Employees were also more generally concerned with higher levels of needs (social needs), as specified in Maslow's hierarchy of needs (Maslow, 1968), partly due to interpersonal interrelations and knowledge-dependent professional networks. The most significant hypotheses included individual network learning, team sustainability, effort learning all at p<.001, while interpersonal performance and mutual reciprocity were at p<.10. Construct validity, using covariates, revealed an acceptable Discretionary Effort model fit of VIEA: χ = 102, df = 17, RMSEA = .0584, NFI = .95, CFI = .95 and GFI = .983. 2019-09-19T13:06:47Z 2019-09-19T13:06:47Z 2011 2019-09-19T13:05:46Z Doctoral Thesis Doctoral http://hdl.handle.net/11427/30554 eng application/pdf Graduate School of Business (GSB) Faculty of Commerce
spellingShingle Katoma, Victor
A framework for discretionary effort based on performance expectancies in integrated work environment
thesis_degree_str Doctoral
title A framework for discretionary effort based on performance expectancies in integrated work environment
title_full A framework for discretionary effort based on performance expectancies in integrated work environment
title_fullStr A framework for discretionary effort based on performance expectancies in integrated work environment
title_full_unstemmed A framework for discretionary effort based on performance expectancies in integrated work environment
title_short A framework for discretionary effort based on performance expectancies in integrated work environment
title_sort framework for discretionary effort based on performance expectancies in integrated work environment
url http://hdl.handle.net/11427/30554
work_keys_str_mv AT katomavictor aframeworkfordiscretionaryeffortbasedonperformanceexpectanciesinintegratedworkenvironment
AT katomavictor frameworkfordiscretionaryeffortbasedonperformanceexpectanciesinintegratedworkenvironment