Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

School Vision Screening Programs In Reducingchildren With Uncorrected Refractive Error In Low And Middle-income Countries (Lmic)(Systematic Review)

Background: The prevalence of uncorrected refractive error among school-age children is on the rise with a detrimental effect on academic performance and socio-economic status of those affected. School vision screening appears to be an effective way of identifying children with uncorrected refractiv...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Abraham, Opare
Other Authors: Abdullahi, Leila H.
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: Department of Public Health and Family Medicine 2020
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613266487803904
access_status_str Open Access
author Abraham, Opare
author2 Abdullahi, Leila H.
author_browse Abdullahi, Leila H.
Abraham, Opare
author_facet Abdullahi, Leila H.
Abraham, Opare
author_sort Abraham, Opare
collection Thesis
description Background: The prevalence of uncorrected refractive error among school-age children is on the rise with a detrimental effect on academic performance and socio-economic status of those affected. School vision screening appears to be an effective way of identifying children with uncorrected refractive error so early intervention can be made. Despite the increasing popularity of school vision screening programs in recent times, there is a lot of debate on its effectiveness in reducing the proportion of children with uncorrected refractive error in the long term especially in settings where resources are limited. Objective: To assess the effectiveness of school vision screening programs in reducing children with uncorrected refractive error in LMIC. Search Methods: To identify studies suitable for this systematic review, a comprehensive and systematic search strategy was employed. We searched various databases and the search was restricted to articles published in English. We included RCTs, cross-sectional studies, case-control studies, and cohort studies. Participants included school children who had undergone vision screening as part of school vision screening programs in the LMIC setting and found to have a refractive error. Two independent reviewers screened the result of the search output and performed a full-text review of the search result to identify papers that met the pre-defined inclusion criteria. Data extraction and risk of bias assessment for the included studies was performed by the two independent reviewers and discrepancies were resolved by consensus and through consultation. The certainty of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. Main Result: We found thirty relevant studies conducted in ten different countries that answered our review questions. Our review showed that school vision screening may be effective in reducing the proportion of children with an uncorrected refractive error by 81% (95% CI: 77%; 84%, moderate certainty evidence), 24% (95% CI: 13%; 35%, moderate certainty evidence,) and 20% (95% CI: 18%; 22%, moderate certainty evidence) at two, six, and more than six months respectively after its introduction. Our review also suggest that school vision screening may be effective in achieving 54% (95% CI: 25%; 100%, moderate certainty evidence), 57% (95% CI:46%; 70%, low certainty evidence), 38% (95% CI: 29%; 51%, moderate certainty evidence) and 41% (95% CI: 24%; 68%, low certainty evidence) level of spectacle wear compliance among school children at less than three months, at three months, at six months and at more than six months respectively after its introduction. Our review further found moderate to high certainty evidence indicating that school vision screening together with the provision of spectacles may be relatively cost-effective, safe and has a positive impact on the academic performance of children. Conclusion: Result of this review shows that school vision screening together with the provision of spectacle may be a safe and cost-effective way of reducing the proportion of children with uncorrected refractive error with a long-term positive impact on academic performance of children. Most of the studies included in this review were however conducted in Asia and the applicability of this finding to countries in other regions especially those outside the LMIC circle is not clear.
format Thesis
id oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/31171
institution University of Cape Town (South Africa)
language eng
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:33:25.185Z
license_str Not specified — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
publishDate 2020
publishDateRange 2020
publishDateSort 2020
publisher Department of Public Health and Family Medicine
publisherStr Department of Public Health and Family Medicine
record_format dspace
source_str UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
spelling oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/31171 School Vision Screening Programs In Reducingchildren With Uncorrected Refractive Error In Low And Middle-income Countries (Lmic)(Systematic Review) Abraham, Opare Abdullahi, Leila H. Minnes, Deon Cook, Colin Refractive error low- and middle-income countries school vision screenings Background: The prevalence of uncorrected refractive error among school-age children is on the rise with a detrimental effect on academic performance and socio-economic status of those affected. School vision screening appears to be an effective way of identifying children with uncorrected refractive error so early intervention can be made. Despite the increasing popularity of school vision screening programs in recent times, there is a lot of debate on its effectiveness in reducing the proportion of children with uncorrected refractive error in the long term especially in settings where resources are limited. Objective: To assess the effectiveness of school vision screening programs in reducing children with uncorrected refractive error in LMIC. Search Methods: To identify studies suitable for this systematic review, a comprehensive and systematic search strategy was employed. We searched various databases and the search was restricted to articles published in English. We included RCTs, cross-sectional studies, case-control studies, and cohort studies. Participants included school children who had undergone vision screening as part of school vision screening programs in the LMIC setting and found to have a refractive error. Two independent reviewers screened the result of the search output and performed a full-text review of the search result to identify papers that met the pre-defined inclusion criteria. Data extraction and risk of bias assessment for the included studies was performed by the two independent reviewers and discrepancies were resolved by consensus and through consultation. The certainty of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. Main Result: We found thirty relevant studies conducted in ten different countries that answered our review questions. Our review showed that school vision screening may be effective in reducing the proportion of children with an uncorrected refractive error by 81% (95% CI: 77%; 84%, moderate certainty evidence), 24% (95% CI: 13%; 35%, moderate certainty evidence,) and 20% (95% CI: 18%; 22%, moderate certainty evidence) at two, six, and more than six months respectively after its introduction. Our review also suggest that school vision screening may be effective in achieving 54% (95% CI: 25%; 100%, moderate certainty evidence), 57% (95% CI:46%; 70%, low certainty evidence), 38% (95% CI: 29%; 51%, moderate certainty evidence) and 41% (95% CI: 24%; 68%, low certainty evidence) level of spectacle wear compliance among school children at less than three months, at three months, at six months and at more than six months respectively after its introduction. Our review further found moderate to high certainty evidence indicating that school vision screening together with the provision of spectacles may be relatively cost-effective, safe and has a positive impact on the academic performance of children. Conclusion: Result of this review shows that school vision screening together with the provision of spectacle may be a safe and cost-effective way of reducing the proportion of children with uncorrected refractive error with a long-term positive impact on academic performance of children. Most of the studies included in this review were however conducted in Asia and the applicability of this finding to countries in other regions especially those outside the LMIC circle is not clear. 2020-02-20T07:54:33Z 2020-02-20T07:54:33Z 2019 2020-02-14T09:09:00Z Master Thesis Masters MPH http://hdl.handle.net/11427/31171 eng application/pdf Department of Public Health and Family Medicine Faculty of Health Sciences
spellingShingle Refractive error
low- and middle-income countries
school vision screenings
Abraham, Opare
School Vision Screening Programs In Reducingchildren With Uncorrected Refractive Error In Low And Middle-income Countries (Lmic)(Systematic Review)
thesis_degree_str Master's
title School Vision Screening Programs In Reducingchildren With Uncorrected Refractive Error In Low And Middle-income Countries (Lmic)(Systematic Review)
title_full School Vision Screening Programs In Reducingchildren With Uncorrected Refractive Error In Low And Middle-income Countries (Lmic)(Systematic Review)
title_fullStr School Vision Screening Programs In Reducingchildren With Uncorrected Refractive Error In Low And Middle-income Countries (Lmic)(Systematic Review)
title_full_unstemmed School Vision Screening Programs In Reducingchildren With Uncorrected Refractive Error In Low And Middle-income Countries (Lmic)(Systematic Review)
title_short School Vision Screening Programs In Reducingchildren With Uncorrected Refractive Error In Low And Middle-income Countries (Lmic)(Systematic Review)
title_sort school vision screening programs in reducingchildren with uncorrected refractive error in low and middle income countries lmic systematic review
topic Refractive error
low- and middle-income countries
school vision screenings
url http://hdl.handle.net/11427/31171
work_keys_str_mv AT abrahamopare schoolvisionscreeningprogramsinreducingchildrenwithuncorrectedrefractiveerrorinlowandmiddleincomecountrieslmicsystematicreview