Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

The economics of addiction: an experimental investigation

Addiction is an ideal puzzle for economic theory: why do most addicts expend resources to acquire their targets of addiction but then incur real costs to try and reduce or limit their consumption of these goods? Furthermore, why is the typical course of addiction characterised by repeated unsuccessf...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hofmeyr, Andre Karl
Other Authors: Ross, Donald
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: School of Economics 2020
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613149360816128
access_status_str Open Access
author Hofmeyr, Andre Karl
author2 Ross, Donald
author_browse Hofmeyr, Andre Karl
Ross, Donald
author_facet Ross, Donald
Hofmeyr, Andre Karl
author_sort Hofmeyr, Andre Karl
collection Thesis
description Addiction is an ideal puzzle for economic theory: why do most addicts expend resources to acquire their targets of addiction but then incur real costs to try and reduce or limit their consumption of these goods? Furthermore, why is the typical course of addiction characterised by repeated unsuccessful attempts to quit prior to final abstention? From the standpoint of standard consumer theory in economics these patterns of behaviour are difficult to rationalise. There is a rich theoretical literature in economics which models habit-forming behaviours, of which addiction is the exemplar, but there is a paucity of experimental economic studies eliciting and comparing the preferences – specifically, risk and time preferences – that economic theory suggests may differ between addicts and non-addicts. The experimental research that has been conducted has been dominated by psychologists, and some economists have begun to follow their methodological lead. However, detailed reviews of the experimental literature on addiction highlight a number of methodological and statistical flaws in the ways these data have been collected and analysed. This thesis is primarily concerned with methodological and statistical issues at the boundary between economics and psychology as these bear upon developing a general, consistent explanation of addiction. An incentive-compatible experimental design is formulated which lends itself to the estimation of several different theories of choice under risk and over time. In addition, a full information maximum likelihood statistical framework, which is consistent with the data generating processes proposed by structural theories and accounts for subject errors in decision making, is used to explore the relationship between risk preferences, time preferences and addiction. This thesis challenges some of the maintained assumptions in the addiction literature; e.g., that the probability discounting and hyperbolic discounting models best characterise choice under risk and over time, respectively. But it also replicates a previous finding; i.e., that smokers tend to discount the future more heavily than non-smokers. It shows, therefore, that some results withstand careful methodological and statistical scrutiny, whereas other results do not. Ultimately, this thesis argues that tools from experimental economics and econometrics, which have been under-used in addiction studies, contribute to a more accurate and reliable characterisation of this phenomenon.
format Thesis
id oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/31836
institution University of Cape Town (South Africa)
language eng
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:31:31.816Z
license_str Not specified — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
publishDate 2020
publishDateRange 2020
publishDateSort 2020
publisher School of Economics
publisherStr School of Economics
record_format dspace
source_str UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
spelling oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/31836 The economics of addiction: an experimental investigation Hofmeyr, Andre Karl Ross, Donald Harrison, Glenn Economics Addiction is an ideal puzzle for economic theory: why do most addicts expend resources to acquire their targets of addiction but then incur real costs to try and reduce or limit their consumption of these goods? Furthermore, why is the typical course of addiction characterised by repeated unsuccessful attempts to quit prior to final abstention? From the standpoint of standard consumer theory in economics these patterns of behaviour are difficult to rationalise. There is a rich theoretical literature in economics which models habit-forming behaviours, of which addiction is the exemplar, but there is a paucity of experimental economic studies eliciting and comparing the preferences – specifically, risk and time preferences – that economic theory suggests may differ between addicts and non-addicts. The experimental research that has been conducted has been dominated by psychologists, and some economists have begun to follow their methodological lead. However, detailed reviews of the experimental literature on addiction highlight a number of methodological and statistical flaws in the ways these data have been collected and analysed. This thesis is primarily concerned with methodological and statistical issues at the boundary between economics and psychology as these bear upon developing a general, consistent explanation of addiction. An incentive-compatible experimental design is formulated which lends itself to the estimation of several different theories of choice under risk and over time. In addition, a full information maximum likelihood statistical framework, which is consistent with the data generating processes proposed by structural theories and accounts for subject errors in decision making, is used to explore the relationship between risk preferences, time preferences and addiction. This thesis challenges some of the maintained assumptions in the addiction literature; e.g., that the probability discounting and hyperbolic discounting models best characterise choice under risk and over time, respectively. But it also replicates a previous finding; i.e., that smokers tend to discount the future more heavily than non-smokers. It shows, therefore, that some results withstand careful methodological and statistical scrutiny, whereas other results do not. Ultimately, this thesis argues that tools from experimental economics and econometrics, which have been under-used in addiction studies, contribute to a more accurate and reliable characterisation of this phenomenon. 2020-05-08T09:58:41Z 2020-05-08T09:58:41Z 2015 2020-05-08T09:54:44Z Doctoral Thesis Doctoral https://hdl.handle.net/11427/31836 eng application/pdf School of Economics Faculty of Commerce
spellingShingle Economics
Hofmeyr, Andre Karl
The economics of addiction: an experimental investigation
thesis_degree_str Doctoral
title The economics of addiction: an experimental investigation
title_full The economics of addiction: an experimental investigation
title_fullStr The economics of addiction: an experimental investigation
title_full_unstemmed The economics of addiction: an experimental investigation
title_short The economics of addiction: an experimental investigation
title_sort economics of addiction an experimental investigation
topic Economics
url https://hdl.handle.net/11427/31836
work_keys_str_mv AT hofmeyrandrekarl theeconomicsofaddictionanexperimentalinvestigation
AT hofmeyrandrekarl economicsofaddictionanexperimentalinvestigation