Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

Is there a Gross Profitability Premium on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange?

This study tests whether a gross-profit-to-assets premium exists on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE) by constructing portfolios over a 16-year time period from 2002 to 2018. The use of gross-profit-toassets as a stock selection tool has been found to be a viable investment strategy in some deve...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Dean, Jacqueline
Other Authors: Toerien, Francois
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: Department of Finance and Tax 2021
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613212397010944
access_status_str Open Access
author Dean, Jacqueline
author2 Toerien, Francois
author_browse Dean, Jacqueline
Toerien, Francois
author_facet Toerien, Francois
Dean, Jacqueline
author_sort Dean, Jacqueline
collection Thesis
description This study tests whether a gross-profit-to-assets premium exists on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE) by constructing portfolios over a 16-year time period from 2002 to 2018. The use of gross-profit-toassets as a stock selection tool has been found to be a viable investment strategy in some developed markets. However, this concept has not been tested on the JSE, which is a sophisticated stock exchange within a developing economy. This approach may also be a viable strategy for South African investors and, thus, is worth investigating. In addition, there exists the possibility of improving value strategies by adding a gross-profit-to-assets quality strategy overlay to hedge against the “value trap” to which the former method is susceptible. This study, therefore, compares value investing to quality investing strategies in terms of their returns by constructing both long and long-short portfolios using four metrics namely: gross-profit-to-asset ratios, book-to-price ratios, earnings-to-price ratios, and a double sort of gross-profit-to-assets ratios and bookto-price ratios. In addition, excess and abnormal returns are calculated, and portfolios are once again compared to each other. When excess returns are calculated, each separately constructed portfolio is compared to the market index, and then to the risk-free rate. Lastly, the individual portfolios are compared to expected returns, calculated using the Capital Asset Pricing and the Fama and French Five Factor (2015) asset pricing models. The study finds that long only portfolios constructed using gross-profit-to-assets outperformed both bookto-price and earnings-to-price metrics. Further, it is found that adding gross-profit-to-assets to a value strategy, using the book-to-price ratio, is an improvement on a simple value strategy – probably because it avoids the “value trap” problem. While the long only portfolios show positive results, the long-short portfolios are not as successful. For long-short portfolios, gross-profit-to-assets and the double-sort are still superior to book-to-price and earnings-to-price, but when compared to the market index, the portfolios all underperform. Regressions of the excess returns of both the long and long-short portfolios against the five factors of Fama and French's Five Factor Model (2015) show that the intercepts (alphas) of the various portfolio excess returns are not statistically significant and, in the case of the long portfolios, are weakly negative. Within the assumptions of this model, these findings, therefore, fail to confirm that the various factorbased investment strategies statistically outperform the market on a risk-adjusted basis.
format Thesis
id oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/32643
institution University of Cape Town (South Africa)
language eng
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:32:33.381Z
license_str Not specified — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
publishDate 2021
publishDateRange 2021
publishDateSort 2021
publisher Department of Finance and Tax
publisherStr Department of Finance and Tax
record_format dspace
source_str UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
spelling oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/32643 Is there a Gross Profitability Premium on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange? Dean, Jacqueline Toerien, Francois Financial Management This study tests whether a gross-profit-to-assets premium exists on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE) by constructing portfolios over a 16-year time period from 2002 to 2018. The use of gross-profit-toassets as a stock selection tool has been found to be a viable investment strategy in some developed markets. However, this concept has not been tested on the JSE, which is a sophisticated stock exchange within a developing economy. This approach may also be a viable strategy for South African investors and, thus, is worth investigating. In addition, there exists the possibility of improving value strategies by adding a gross-profit-to-assets quality strategy overlay to hedge against the “value trap” to which the former method is susceptible. This study, therefore, compares value investing to quality investing strategies in terms of their returns by constructing both long and long-short portfolios using four metrics namely: gross-profit-to-asset ratios, book-to-price ratios, earnings-to-price ratios, and a double sort of gross-profit-to-assets ratios and bookto-price ratios. In addition, excess and abnormal returns are calculated, and portfolios are once again compared to each other. When excess returns are calculated, each separately constructed portfolio is compared to the market index, and then to the risk-free rate. Lastly, the individual portfolios are compared to expected returns, calculated using the Capital Asset Pricing and the Fama and French Five Factor (2015) asset pricing models. The study finds that long only portfolios constructed using gross-profit-to-assets outperformed both bookto-price and earnings-to-price metrics. Further, it is found that adding gross-profit-to-assets to a value strategy, using the book-to-price ratio, is an improvement on a simple value strategy – probably because it avoids the “value trap” problem. While the long only portfolios show positive results, the long-short portfolios are not as successful. For long-short portfolios, gross-profit-to-assets and the double-sort are still superior to book-to-price and earnings-to-price, but when compared to the market index, the portfolios all underperform. Regressions of the excess returns of both the long and long-short portfolios against the five factors of Fama and French's Five Factor Model (2015) show that the intercepts (alphas) of the various portfolio excess returns are not statistically significant and, in the case of the long portfolios, are weakly negative. Within the assumptions of this model, these findings, therefore, fail to confirm that the various factorbased investment strategies statistically outperform the market on a risk-adjusted basis. 2021-01-22T07:05:43Z 2021-01-22T07:05:43Z 2020 2021-01-22T06:45:35Z Master Thesis Masters MCom http://hdl.handle.net/11427/32643 eng application/pdf Department of Finance and Tax Faculty of Commerce
spellingShingle Financial Management
Dean, Jacqueline
Is there a Gross Profitability Premium on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange?
thesis_degree_str Master's
title Is there a Gross Profitability Premium on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange?
title_full Is there a Gross Profitability Premium on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange?
title_fullStr Is there a Gross Profitability Premium on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange?
title_full_unstemmed Is there a Gross Profitability Premium on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange?
title_short Is there a Gross Profitability Premium on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange?
title_sort is there a gross profitability premium on the johannesburg stock exchange
topic Financial Management
url http://hdl.handle.net/11427/32643
work_keys_str_mv AT deanjacqueline isthereagrossprofitabilitypremiumonthejohannesburgstockexchange