Full Text Available
Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.
This dissertation examines whether South Africa's interest deduction tax laws are compatible with selected aspects of their Double Taxation Treaties that are based on the 2017 OECD Model Tax Convention. This dissertation will outline and examine the innerworkings of three of South Africa's domestic...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Thesis |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Department of Commercial Law
2021
|
| Subjects: | |
| Tags: |
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1867613140858961920 |
|---|---|
| access_status_str | Open Access |
| author | Friedman, Joshua Michael |
| author2 | Hattingh, Johann |
| author_browse | Friedman, Joshua Michael Hattingh, Johann |
| author_facet | Hattingh, Johann Friedman, Joshua Michael |
| author_sort | Friedman, Joshua Michael |
| collection | Thesis |
| description | This dissertation examines whether South Africa's interest deduction tax laws are compatible with selected aspects of their Double Taxation Treaties that are based on the 2017 OECD Model Tax Convention. This dissertation will outline and examine the innerworkings of three of South Africa's domestic interest deduction legislative provisions namely, sections 23N, 31 and 23M of the Income Tax Act. Thereafter, the relevant Non-Discrimination provisions of the 2017 OECD Model Tax Convention contained in Article 24 will be discussed. The exemptions to Article 24 will also be dealt with before addressing the impact of the recently added ‘Savings Clause'. The understandings gained from the above will then be used to test South Africa's interest deduction legislative provisions against the relevant Articles of the OECD Model Tax Convention. This dissertation concludes the following: section 23N does not constitute discrimination; section 31 necessarily does but falls within one of the exemptions to Article 24; and section 23M violates the non-discrimination provision contained in Article 24(4) and as such, is not compatible with any of South Africa's Doubled Taxation Treaties that contain the relevant Articles. This dissertation ends off with recommendations on how South Africa deals with the conflict, the best of which is to amend section 23M to include an arm's length requirement. |
| format | Thesis |
| id | oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/32665 |
| institution | University of Cape Town (South Africa) |
| language | eng |
| last_indexed | 2026-06-10T12:31:24.573Z |
| license_str | Not specified — see source repository |
| provenance_str_mv | Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository |
| publishDate | 2021 |
| publishDateRange | 2021 |
| publishDateSort | 2021 |
| publisher | Department of Commercial Law |
| publisherStr | Department of Commercial Law |
| record_format | dspace |
| source_str | UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository |
| spelling | oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/32665 South Africa's Restrictions on Interest Deductions and Their Compatibility with the Non-Discrimination Provisions of the 2017 Version of the OECD Model Friedman, Joshua Michael Hattingh, Johann International Taxation This dissertation examines whether South Africa's interest deduction tax laws are compatible with selected aspects of their Double Taxation Treaties that are based on the 2017 OECD Model Tax Convention. This dissertation will outline and examine the innerworkings of three of South Africa's domestic interest deduction legislative provisions namely, sections 23N, 31 and 23M of the Income Tax Act. Thereafter, the relevant Non-Discrimination provisions of the 2017 OECD Model Tax Convention contained in Article 24 will be discussed. The exemptions to Article 24 will also be dealt with before addressing the impact of the recently added ‘Savings Clause'. The understandings gained from the above will then be used to test South Africa's interest deduction legislative provisions against the relevant Articles of the OECD Model Tax Convention. This dissertation concludes the following: section 23N does not constitute discrimination; section 31 necessarily does but falls within one of the exemptions to Article 24; and section 23M violates the non-discrimination provision contained in Article 24(4) and as such, is not compatible with any of South Africa's Doubled Taxation Treaties that contain the relevant Articles. This dissertation ends off with recommendations on how South Africa deals with the conflict, the best of which is to amend section 23M to include an arm's length requirement. 2021-01-25T12:00:42Z 2021-01-25T12:00:42Z 2020 2021-01-25T09:15:18Z Master Thesis Masters LLM http://hdl.handle.net/11427/32665 eng application/pdf Department of Commercial Law Faculty of Law |
| spellingShingle | International Taxation Friedman, Joshua Michael South Africa's Restrictions on Interest Deductions and Their Compatibility with the Non-Discrimination Provisions of the 2017 Version of the OECD Model |
| thesis_degree_str | Master's |
| title | South Africa's Restrictions on Interest Deductions and Their Compatibility with the Non-Discrimination Provisions of the 2017 Version of the OECD Model |
| title_full | South Africa's Restrictions on Interest Deductions and Their Compatibility with the Non-Discrimination Provisions of the 2017 Version of the OECD Model |
| title_fullStr | South Africa's Restrictions on Interest Deductions and Their Compatibility with the Non-Discrimination Provisions of the 2017 Version of the OECD Model |
| title_full_unstemmed | South Africa's Restrictions on Interest Deductions and Their Compatibility with the Non-Discrimination Provisions of the 2017 Version of the OECD Model |
| title_short | South Africa's Restrictions on Interest Deductions and Their Compatibility with the Non-Discrimination Provisions of the 2017 Version of the OECD Model |
| title_sort | south africa s restrictions on interest deductions and their compatibility with the non discrimination provisions of the 2017 version of the oecd model |
| topic | International Taxation |
| url | http://hdl.handle.net/11427/32665 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT friedmanjoshuamichael southafricasrestrictionsoninterestdeductionsandtheircompatibilitywiththenondiscriminationprovisionsofthe2017versionoftheoecdmodel |