Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

Comparative review of the benefits and flexibility of small modular reactor designs

Over the past few years, there has been a sustained interest in the development of small modular reactors (SMRs) evident by the number of global initiatives focused on SMR development. This desktop study was performed to review the viability of SMRs based on their benefits and flexibility, focusing...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Featherstone, Keith
Other Authors: Gaunt, Charles T
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: Department of Electrical Engineering 2021
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613204830486528
access_status_str Open Access
author Featherstone, Keith
author2 Gaunt, Charles T
author_browse Featherstone, Keith
Gaunt, Charles T
author_facet Gaunt, Charles T
Featherstone, Keith
author_sort Featherstone, Keith
collection Thesis
description Over the past few years, there has been a sustained interest in the development of small modular reactors (SMRs) evident by the number of global initiatives focused on SMR development. This desktop study was performed to review the viability of SMRs based on their benefits and flexibility, focusing predominantly on the light water NuScale and the gas cooled AHTR designs. In assessing the level of safety, the typical general design and safety criteria were reviewed to establish a basis to compare the NuScale and AHTR designs. The need for flexibility to support grid operators and the ability of a nuclear plant to load follow were reviewed to confirm their flexibility. The principal of cogeneration and the feasibility for cogeneration and energy storage with SMRs was explored to determine the potential industrial application. Finally, the technical readiness and uncertainties, the potential market and economic competitiveness of SMRs were reviewed. The review established that SMRs with safety performance levels exceeding those of current reactor designs are definitely viable. The ability to prevent fuel failure through passive cooling simplifies the design by eliminating the need for complex safety systems and reduces the constraints associated with siting, opening up energy markets where previously nuclear reactors would not have been viable. Their flexibility and the ability to add additional units over time enable them to integrate into any size electrical network and a variety of energy markets. As a clean energy source, SMRs are well suited to support strategies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and replace fossil-based energy sources. SMRs operating at high temperatures have the added option of considering thermal storage as a means to provide additional flexibility. The biggest uncertainty in the deployment of SMRs is associated with the regulatory and licencing processes. However, there is a large potential market for SMRs and the lower capital cost per unit, the shorter period until a revenue stream is established and the ability to stagger the financial impact of additional units are expected to make SMRs easier to finance than large nuclear units. This preliminary review concluded that SMRs are definitely viable, but until a SMR design has been successfully licenced, constructed and operated, the uncertainty associated with the licencing of a new technology and the potential for long delays during construction are likely to prevent any large-scale deployment in the near future.
format Thesis
id oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/32666
institution University of Cape Town (South Africa)
language eng
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:32:26.116Z
license_str Not specified — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
publishDate 2021
publishDateRange 2021
publishDateSort 2021
publisher Department of Electrical Engineering
publisherStr Department of Electrical Engineering
record_format dspace
source_str UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
spelling oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/32666 Comparative review of the benefits and flexibility of small modular reactor designs Featherstone, Keith Gaunt, Charles T Nuclear Technology Over the past few years, there has been a sustained interest in the development of small modular reactors (SMRs) evident by the number of global initiatives focused on SMR development. This desktop study was performed to review the viability of SMRs based on their benefits and flexibility, focusing predominantly on the light water NuScale and the gas cooled AHTR designs. In assessing the level of safety, the typical general design and safety criteria were reviewed to establish a basis to compare the NuScale and AHTR designs. The need for flexibility to support grid operators and the ability of a nuclear plant to load follow were reviewed to confirm their flexibility. The principal of cogeneration and the feasibility for cogeneration and energy storage with SMRs was explored to determine the potential industrial application. Finally, the technical readiness and uncertainties, the potential market and economic competitiveness of SMRs were reviewed. The review established that SMRs with safety performance levels exceeding those of current reactor designs are definitely viable. The ability to prevent fuel failure through passive cooling simplifies the design by eliminating the need for complex safety systems and reduces the constraints associated with siting, opening up energy markets where previously nuclear reactors would not have been viable. Their flexibility and the ability to add additional units over time enable them to integrate into any size electrical network and a variety of energy markets. As a clean energy source, SMRs are well suited to support strategies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and replace fossil-based energy sources. SMRs operating at high temperatures have the added option of considering thermal storage as a means to provide additional flexibility. The biggest uncertainty in the deployment of SMRs is associated with the regulatory and licencing processes. However, there is a large potential market for SMRs and the lower capital cost per unit, the shorter period until a revenue stream is established and the ability to stagger the financial impact of additional units are expected to make SMRs easier to finance than large nuclear units. This preliminary review concluded that SMRs are definitely viable, but until a SMR design has been successfully licenced, constructed and operated, the uncertainty associated with the licencing of a new technology and the potential for long delays during construction are likely to prevent any large-scale deployment in the near future. 2021-01-25T12:06:13Z 2021-01-25T12:06:13Z 2020 2021-01-25T08:22:16Z Master Thesis Masters MPhil http://hdl.handle.net/11427/32666 eng application/pdf Department of Electrical Engineering Faculty of Engineering and the Built Environment
spellingShingle Nuclear Technology
Featherstone, Keith
Comparative review of the benefits and flexibility of small modular reactor designs
thesis_degree_str Master's
title Comparative review of the benefits and flexibility of small modular reactor designs
title_full Comparative review of the benefits and flexibility of small modular reactor designs
title_fullStr Comparative review of the benefits and flexibility of small modular reactor designs
title_full_unstemmed Comparative review of the benefits and flexibility of small modular reactor designs
title_short Comparative review of the benefits and flexibility of small modular reactor designs
title_sort comparative review of the benefits and flexibility of small modular reactor designs
topic Nuclear Technology
url http://hdl.handle.net/11427/32666
work_keys_str_mv AT featherstonekeith comparativereviewofthebenefitsandflexibilityofsmallmodularreactordesigns