Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

The impact of the FRTB on Market Risk Capital for the South African InterBank Interest Rate Market

Regulations require banks to hold a minimum amount of capital for market risk resulting from their trading operations and prescribe two approaches to calculating this minimum capital requirement: (i) a Standardised Approach (SA); and (ii) an Internal Models Approach (IMA). The global financial crisi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mwanza, Jacob
Other Authors: Mahomed, Obeid
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: African Institute of Financial Markets and Risk Management 2021
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613725205200896
access_status_str Open Access
author Mwanza, Jacob
author2 Mahomed, Obeid
author_browse Mahomed, Obeid
Mwanza, Jacob
author_facet Mahomed, Obeid
Mwanza, Jacob
author_sort Mwanza, Jacob
collection Thesis
description Regulations require banks to hold a minimum amount of capital for market risk resulting from their trading operations and prescribe two approaches to calculating this minimum capital requirement: (i) a Standardised Approach (SA); and (ii) an Internal Models Approach (IMA). The global financial crisis of 2008 highlighted flaws in the Basel 2 regulatory framework used by banks to calculate market risk capital charges for trading operations. In 2009, Basel 2.5 was introduced to deal with some but not all of the flaws of Basel 2. Both Basel 2 and 2.5 use the Value at Risk (VaR) risk measure as the basis to determine IMA capital charges. From 2022 onwards, Basel 2.5 will be replaced by the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book (FRTB), a new framework for calculating market risk capital charges for trading operations. The FRTB replaces VaR with the Expected Shortfall (ES) risk measure in the IMA and introduces a new SA. This dissertation investigates the impact the FRTB will have on market risk capital charges for portfolios of linear South African interbank interest rate products. Capital charges are calculated for these portfolios under the Basel 2, Basel 2.5 and FRTB regulatory frameworks. A comparison and analysis of the resulting capital charges is then presented.
format Thesis
id oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/32925
institution University of Cape Town (South Africa)
language eng
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:40:42.696Z
license_str Not specified — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
publishDate 2021
publishDateRange 2021
publishDateSort 2021
publisher African Institute of Financial Markets and Risk Management
publisherStr African Institute of Financial Markets and Risk Management
record_format dspace
source_str UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
spelling oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/32925 The impact of the FRTB on Market Risk Capital for the South African InterBank Interest Rate Market Mwanza, Jacob Mahomed, Obeid Mathematical Finance Regulations require banks to hold a minimum amount of capital for market risk resulting from their trading operations and prescribe two approaches to calculating this minimum capital requirement: (i) a Standardised Approach (SA); and (ii) an Internal Models Approach (IMA). The global financial crisis of 2008 highlighted flaws in the Basel 2 regulatory framework used by banks to calculate market risk capital charges for trading operations. In 2009, Basel 2.5 was introduced to deal with some but not all of the flaws of Basel 2. Both Basel 2 and 2.5 use the Value at Risk (VaR) risk measure as the basis to determine IMA capital charges. From 2022 onwards, Basel 2.5 will be replaced by the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book (FRTB), a new framework for calculating market risk capital charges for trading operations. The FRTB replaces VaR with the Expected Shortfall (ES) risk measure in the IMA and introduces a new SA. This dissertation investigates the impact the FRTB will have on market risk capital charges for portfolios of linear South African interbank interest rate products. Capital charges are calculated for these portfolios under the Basel 2, Basel 2.5 and FRTB regulatory frameworks. A comparison and analysis of the resulting capital charges is then presented. 2021-02-23T05:32:52Z 2021-02-23T05:32:52Z 2020 2021-02-23T05:09:19Z Master Thesis Masters MPhil http://hdl.handle.net/11427/32925 eng application/pdf African Institute of Financial Markets and Risk Management Faculty of Commerce
spellingShingle Mathematical Finance
Mwanza, Jacob
The impact of the FRTB on Market Risk Capital for the South African InterBank Interest Rate Market
thesis_degree_str Master's
title The impact of the FRTB on Market Risk Capital for the South African InterBank Interest Rate Market
title_full The impact of the FRTB on Market Risk Capital for the South African InterBank Interest Rate Market
title_fullStr The impact of the FRTB on Market Risk Capital for the South African InterBank Interest Rate Market
title_full_unstemmed The impact of the FRTB on Market Risk Capital for the South African InterBank Interest Rate Market
title_short The impact of the FRTB on Market Risk Capital for the South African InterBank Interest Rate Market
title_sort impact of the frtb on market risk capital for the south african interbank interest rate market
topic Mathematical Finance
url http://hdl.handle.net/11427/32925
work_keys_str_mv AT mwanzajacob theimpactofthefrtbonmarketriskcapitalforthesouthafricaninterbankinterestratemarket
AT mwanzajacob impactofthefrtbonmarketriskcapitalforthesouthafricaninterbankinterestratemarket