Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

The Pneumococcus Urinary Antigen Test Kit: Use in the laboratory for the presumptive diagnosis of pneumococcal bacteraemia

Introduction: Culture remains the ‘gold standard' for diagnosis of Streptococcus pneumoniae bacteraemia. Time to definitive identification using culture is 24–48 hours, and prior antibiotic therapy, the ability of S. pneumoniae to self-autolyse and its fastidious nature can yield no growth on cultur...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tootla, Hafsah Deepa
Other Authors: Bamford, Colleen
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: Division of Medical Microbiology 2021
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613206229286912
access_status_str Open Access
author Tootla, Hafsah Deepa
author2 Bamford, Colleen
author_browse Bamford, Colleen
Tootla, Hafsah Deepa
author_facet Bamford, Colleen
Tootla, Hafsah Deepa
author_sort Tootla, Hafsah Deepa
collection Thesis
description Introduction: Culture remains the ‘gold standard' for diagnosis of Streptococcus pneumoniae bacteraemia. Time to definitive identification using culture is 24–48 hours, and prior antibiotic therapy, the ability of S. pneumoniae to self-autolyse and its fastidious nature can yield no growth on culture. Novel detection methods for invasive pneumococcal disease include PCR and antigen tests. We evaluated using a urine antigen test directly on selected blood cultures with appropriate Gram stain results, immediately after signalling positive for the rapid identification of S. pneumoniae bacteraemia. Method: We collected 212 blood cultures that had signalled positive with an automated blood culture system, and then yielded gram-positive cocci in pairs/chains or cocci with uncertain morphological arrangement. The BinaxNOW Streptococcus pneumoniae urinary antigen test, routine culture with optochin and real time lytA PCR was performed on all samples. Diagnostic accuracy analysis (sensitivity and specificity) of the antigen test and Gram stain with gram-positive cocci in pairs was each compared to culture positivity for S. pneumoniae, PCR positivity and the composite of culture or PCR positivity for S. pneumoniae as the reference standards. Results: S. pneumoniae (Spn) was cultured in 55 samples, gram-positive organisms other than S. pneumoniae (NSpn) in 140 samples and 17 samples had no growth (NG). Grampositive cocci in pairs was predominant on Gram stain in the Spn/NG groups whilst the minority in the NSpn group. In the Spn group, all except 1 sample which was antigen positive but PCR negative, were antigen and PCR positive. In the NSpn group, antigen and PCR was negative in 123 samples, antigen and PCR positive in 1 sample and antigen positive but PCR negative in the remaining 16 samples. In the NG group, antigen and PCR were positive in 16 samples and antigen positive but PCR negative in 1 sample. Sensitivity of the antigen test compared to culture, PCR or the composite of culture or PCR was 100%. Specificity was 87-88% but increased to 93-96% when used in subsets with gram-positive cocci in pairs or clinical history compatible with respiratory illness or meningitis. Sensitivity and specificity of the antigen test when compared to Gram stain using gram-positive cocci in pairs (69%-75% and 81% respectively) were both higher. Discussion and Conclusion: Accurate and rapid diagnosis of S. pneumoniae bacteraemia is challenging with current diagnostic tools. Specificity of the antigen test is mostly limited by crossreactivity with viridans streptococci, coagulase negative staphylococci and enterococcus species, but this can be overcome if Gram stain morphology and clinical history is available. Sensitivity and specificity of Gram stain alone in predicting S. pneumoniae bacteraemia is poor and is increased with use of the antigen test. The antigen test is a useful adjunctive tool improving diagnosis and turnaround time of S. pneumoniae bacteraemia. In settings like ours, where high-level resistance, defined as minimum inhibitory concentration ≥2μg/mL to penicillin is still relatively low (~7%), rapid de-escalation to penicillin in the appropriate clinical setting would be possible with the introduction of such test and could also potentially be a suitable alternative to molecular testing for S. pneumoniae identification in samples with no growth on culture.
format Thesis
id oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/33048
institution University of Cape Town (South Africa)
language eng
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:32:27.580Z
license_str Not specified — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
publishDate 2021
publishDateRange 2021
publishDateSort 2021
publisher Division of Medical Microbiology
publisherStr Division of Medical Microbiology
record_format dspace
source_str UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
spelling oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/33048 The Pneumococcus Urinary Antigen Test Kit: Use in the laboratory for the presumptive diagnosis of pneumococcal bacteraemia Tootla, Hafsah Deepa Bamford, Colleen Moodley, Clinton Pathology Introduction: Culture remains the ‘gold standard' for diagnosis of Streptococcus pneumoniae bacteraemia. Time to definitive identification using culture is 24–48 hours, and prior antibiotic therapy, the ability of S. pneumoniae to self-autolyse and its fastidious nature can yield no growth on culture. Novel detection methods for invasive pneumococcal disease include PCR and antigen tests. We evaluated using a urine antigen test directly on selected blood cultures with appropriate Gram stain results, immediately after signalling positive for the rapid identification of S. pneumoniae bacteraemia. Method: We collected 212 blood cultures that had signalled positive with an automated blood culture system, and then yielded gram-positive cocci in pairs/chains or cocci with uncertain morphological arrangement. The BinaxNOW Streptococcus pneumoniae urinary antigen test, routine culture with optochin and real time lytA PCR was performed on all samples. Diagnostic accuracy analysis (sensitivity and specificity) of the antigen test and Gram stain with gram-positive cocci in pairs was each compared to culture positivity for S. pneumoniae, PCR positivity and the composite of culture or PCR positivity for S. pneumoniae as the reference standards. Results: S. pneumoniae (Spn) was cultured in 55 samples, gram-positive organisms other than S. pneumoniae (NSpn) in 140 samples and 17 samples had no growth (NG). Grampositive cocci in pairs was predominant on Gram stain in the Spn/NG groups whilst the minority in the NSpn group. In the Spn group, all except 1 sample which was antigen positive but PCR negative, were antigen and PCR positive. In the NSpn group, antigen and PCR was negative in 123 samples, antigen and PCR positive in 1 sample and antigen positive but PCR negative in the remaining 16 samples. In the NG group, antigen and PCR were positive in 16 samples and antigen positive but PCR negative in 1 sample. Sensitivity of the antigen test compared to culture, PCR or the composite of culture or PCR was 100%. Specificity was 87-88% but increased to 93-96% when used in subsets with gram-positive cocci in pairs or clinical history compatible with respiratory illness or meningitis. Sensitivity and specificity of the antigen test when compared to Gram stain using gram-positive cocci in pairs (69%-75% and 81% respectively) were both higher. Discussion and Conclusion: Accurate and rapid diagnosis of S. pneumoniae bacteraemia is challenging with current diagnostic tools. Specificity of the antigen test is mostly limited by crossreactivity with viridans streptococci, coagulase negative staphylococci and enterococcus species, but this can be overcome if Gram stain morphology and clinical history is available. Sensitivity and specificity of Gram stain alone in predicting S. pneumoniae bacteraemia is poor and is increased with use of the antigen test. The antigen test is a useful adjunctive tool improving diagnosis and turnaround time of S. pneumoniae bacteraemia. In settings like ours, where high-level resistance, defined as minimum inhibitory concentration ≥2μg/mL to penicillin is still relatively low (~7%), rapid de-escalation to penicillin in the appropriate clinical setting would be possible with the introduction of such test and could also potentially be a suitable alternative to molecular testing for S. pneumoniae identification in samples with no growth on culture. 2021-03-02T07:26:47Z 2021-03-02T07:26:47Z 2020 2021-03-01T22:31:45Z Master Thesis Masters MMed http://hdl.handle.net/11427/33048 eng application/pdf Division of Medical Microbiology Faculty of Health Sciences
spellingShingle Pathology
Tootla, Hafsah Deepa
The Pneumococcus Urinary Antigen Test Kit: Use in the laboratory for the presumptive diagnosis of pneumococcal bacteraemia
thesis_degree_str Master's
title The Pneumococcus Urinary Antigen Test Kit: Use in the laboratory for the presumptive diagnosis of pneumococcal bacteraemia
title_full The Pneumococcus Urinary Antigen Test Kit: Use in the laboratory for the presumptive diagnosis of pneumococcal bacteraemia
title_fullStr The Pneumococcus Urinary Antigen Test Kit: Use in the laboratory for the presumptive diagnosis of pneumococcal bacteraemia
title_full_unstemmed The Pneumococcus Urinary Antigen Test Kit: Use in the laboratory for the presumptive diagnosis of pneumococcal bacteraemia
title_short The Pneumococcus Urinary Antigen Test Kit: Use in the laboratory for the presumptive diagnosis of pneumococcal bacteraemia
title_sort pneumococcus urinary antigen test kit use in the laboratory for the presumptive diagnosis of pneumococcal bacteraemia
topic Pathology
url http://hdl.handle.net/11427/33048
work_keys_str_mv AT tootlahafsahdeepa thepneumococcusurinaryantigentestkituseinthelaboratoryforthepresumptivediagnosisofpneumococcalbacteraemia
AT tootlahafsahdeepa pneumococcusurinaryantigentestkituseinthelaboratoryforthepresumptivediagnosisofpneumococcalbacteraemia